LOL, I chuckle when a cerebrally challenged individual hijacks a thread to make what point? And then gets called to the mat on it. Nice job TRSC!!
You're clearly new here. There is a reason not a single one of the supposed ten other people Sammy claims witnessed and called me out on lying and changing a post will acknowledge it in this thread; because it didn't happen.
And, as I pointed out posts ago, instead of discussing the complete falsehoods Sammy is called out on in each thread, he avoids that and tries changing the subject which he has continued trying to do here.
Sammy used to rarely post on here and only post on the smack and Pullman boards. On the smack board, even Marshall fans started to rail against him because of the outlandishly incorrect things he would post. On Pullman, much like on here, he would attempt to be an expert on many topics, yet would post a ton of false information. He then tried stating it like he was an expert on the matter. After countless times of getting called out on it, from people of both sides of arguments, he stopped posting over there, too.
So your lie above about changing "an" to "a" is, umm, a lie.
Learn to read. I stated what your habit is on here; providing a lot of false information, getting called out on it, then trying to argue something meaningless to dodge all of the bullshit you posted. The "an" and "a" example was just that- an example of something pointless you would argue, much like the accident of switching "Texas" and "Dallas" in your quote which gave no change in your message, yet you harped on that relentlessly instead of trying to defend all of your incorrect information.
In your childish rage, you forgot that I, and several others had already quoted you. So in post #34 you actually said "A". I, and other quoted it. Then you changed #34 to "B" and, now almost six months later, remain butt hurt. You won't admit what you did, and you have let it consume you, at least in terms of this board.
The "A" and "B" you refer to were Dallas and Texas. Again, switching those in your quote had absolutely no relevance to what was being discussed or what you were fabricating. Yet, that's all you would discuss the entire rest of the thread because you wanted to avoid the numerous errors you attempted to present as facts, much like you're attempting to do in this thread.
Ten others supposedly called me out on some lie, yet none will support your claim. Hmm. There were plenty of people who disagreed with my argument that Marshall should have played a middle of the pack (not bottom feeder as you, like always, incorrectly argued) big 10 team, by none claimed I was lying about anything.
You contribute nothing to it, but to try to catch me in your great takes like "American" and "foreign" are somehow different words in terms of the CFL.
This one is even more recent than the Dallas/Texas thread. You presented entirely false information about the numbers CFL teams were able to have on their rosters, including the number of forfeign players. I called you out on those errors. At the same time, as a side note, I clarified your use of "Americans" to "foreigners" (or nationals/non-Canadians) because the CFL's rules don't have a limit on just Americans, but rather, foreigners. Again, it wasn't the main errors you were called out on, but just an important clarification of your false information. I provided a link to the official CFL rules proving my information correct and your information incorrect.
Like always, you avoided the crux of the discussion and tried arguing that certain terms meant the same thing, which they did not, and were not the terms the CFL even used.
Later, I'll try to see if that thread is still active so we can all laugh at you some more and give a more accurate example of your lies and manipulation.
