ADVERTISEMENT

According to Fox she has already passed a polygraph

No one is victim shaming moron. Stating facts is not victim shaming. Get back to the trailer park
 
yep like character assassination is always okay as long as the one harmed is a conservative
 
Hahaha.

Your stupid act is incredible.

Serious question which I knew you (a moron) wouldn’t/can’t answer.

A “victim” of sexual assault who claims she wanted to remain anonymous goes out and pays for a polygraph after 30 years?? Yep. Sounds “legit”.
 
Serious question which I knew you (a moron) wouldn’t/can’t answer.

A “victim” of sexual assault who claims she wanted to remain anonymous goes out and pays for a polygraph after 30 years?? Yep. Sounds “legit”.

The two aren’t mutually exclusive, dumbass. (And yes, we all know you have no clue what mutually exclusive means.) No one knew who she was even after the polygraph. They only knew after she willingly agreed to disclose her identity.
 
she knew she would be disclosing her identity - or it would, at the very least, be found out without her disclosing it - when she wrote the letter. nothing like that stays anonymous. it was nothing more than a manufactured ploy to make her claim appear more credible.

at first, i was like RD, he did it, own it, move on and let the chips fall. however, after mainly finding out her background plus having a pile of other women come forward to vouch for his character, no way. this is nothing but yet another trashy dem move to demoralize someone's character in order to keep them from getting a position dems don't want a con in.

liberals truly are mentally deranged disgusting pieces of trash.
 
The two aren’t mutually exclusive, dumbass. (And yes, we all know you have no clue what mutually exclusive means.) No one knew who she was even after the polygraph. They only knew after she willingly agreed to disclose her identity.

Thank you for refusing to address the question with an obvious answer.

There was never an intent for her to stay “anonymous”.

The narrative was set up and ready to go when needed.
 
Polygraphs are not set up to tell whether or not someone is lying or not they are set up to tell whether or not the person believes they are telling a lie or not.

There is a reason why they're in admissible in court and no one takes them seriously. People watch too many movies
 
Thank you for refusing to address the question with an obvious answer.

There was never an intent for her to stay “anonymous”.

The narrative was set up and ready to go when needed.

You mean like 6 years ago when she mentioned Kavanaugh, by name, to her therapist?

Good lord, you’re an idiot.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT