Agencies Given Until March 13 to Submit Reorganization Blueprints
- Thread starter mufan08
- Start date
While it is nice trolling of Musk sending out emails to either respond or get fired. Let the head of the agencies know the expectations going forward and let them decide what/who needs to go and what/who needs to stay with justification.
Now this, I support. It’s the smart, strategic approach.
As I’ve said, no one is upset about efficiency and cost cutting (well some are). They are upset about how it’s being done.
It could have been communicated without the opening rhetoric or undertones of race.
As I’ve said, no one is upset about efficiency and cost cutting (well some are). They are upset about how it’s being done.
It could have been communicated without the opening rhetoric or undertones of race.
likely another msm talking point. i'm not sure if his kind realizes it yet, but we're pretty much numb to being called racists/xenophobes/homophobes/russian apologists, and every other phobe and ism they can think of. 8 years of them screaming it has their cries falling on deaf ears. ignore them, they're obviously mentally deranged, as i've attempted to tell you guys all along.
This. Call us racist 9 years ago and we didn't like it. Call us racist now and we laugh.
Do you guys realize why Musk sent the emails out? He wants to see who is really there and who is not It likely didn't really matter what you answers were. It was accountability to see what email addresses were real. Were the employees there and going to answer and if not you scrub that from the data base or you find out why Little Johnny hasn't answered his email in weeks, months, or years. Where are they at and what are they doing. That was the point of the email. Who responded and who didn't and why.
It was a simple yet great way to start accountability.
My error. I was on the phone at the time and misread the word radical. My apologies.
No, it wasn't. It was a ridiculous and embarrassing power play. Fortunately, the newly appointed department heads were like, F that.
that makes absolutely no sense in the context of your post. Were you reading something about race? Or were you going to assume everything trump does is racist like a good little liberal
I was eating lunch, had my phone in my hand, read it incorrectly, and posted. It was a mistake. I apologized. If you don't like that, so be it.
Read what? Nowhere in this thread was the word radical used until you said it. You used undertones of race. No one else did. The eo posted does t use the term radical. So where did you find it or misread it is all I'm asking.
So your argument is you were going for the phrase "undertones of radical"??? I call bullshit.
The one linked above? Yes I did and i misspoke earlier radical is used once but i still don't see how you get racial from that. It still wouldn't make sense
