ADVERTISEMENT

anoter $57 million taxpayer $$ pissed away by republicans trying to find one single thing

dherd

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 23, 2007
11,203
556
113
the Clintons have EVER done wrong. just add that to the other $687,000,000 over the past thirty years, and guess what folks not a single thing have they found.

After running a congressional oversight committee like a Republican opposition research shop for more than two years, Representative Trey Gowdy appears to be gearing up for the finale. Democrats on the Select Committee on Benghazi expect that a final report will drop soon, just as Hillary Clinton appears poised to clinch the Democratic nomination.

If things had gone his way, Mr. Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, would have found a way to torpedo Mrs. Clinton’s presidential ambitions. After all, Republican lawmakers have admitted that this is precisely what they set out to do.

But things have not gone well for Mr. Gowdy, who has run the investigation with the dexterity and grace of a blindfolded toddler swinging at a piñata. Having pored over reams of documents, grilled Mrs. Clinton in an 11-hour session in October and hauled in more than 100 people for interviews, the Republicans seem to have come up with nothing.

In recent months, Republicans on the committee have pestered the Pentagon to track down potential witnesses who might have damning things to say about Washington’s response to the attack on American government facilities in Benghazi, in eastern Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state. They include a man who identified himself as a military mechanic in an intriguing Facebook post, and “John from Iowa,” a person who claimed to be a drone operator who had called into a right-wing radio talk show.

Stephen Hedger, the assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs, complained to Mr. Gowdy in a letter in April about the “recent crescendo of requests.” The Pentagon, Mr. Hedger wrote, couldn’t find John from Iowa after expending “significant resources to locate anyone who might match the description of this person.”

The Benghazi committee, which was set up in May 2014, has been operational for longer than the 9/11 Commission was. It has dragged on longer than congressional investigations into the attack on Pearl Harbor, the assassination of President Kennedy, Watergate, the Iran-contra scandal, the 1983 bombing that killed 241 American service members in Beirut and the response to Hurricane Katrina.

The committee has spent nearly $7 million looking into an incident that had already been the subject of an independent investigation commissioned by the State Department and nine reports issued by seven other congressional committees. Those reviews faulted the federal government for failing to provide proper security for the American ambassador in Libya and three of his colleagues who were killed, but found no evidence of a cover-up or gross negligence by Mrs. Clinton.
 
Last edited:
$7,000,000, 2 years, 8 investigations, and we find Hillary doing the same thing as Colin Powell, minus the "blasphemy" of a private email server that so far caused no problems.
 
that's rich herdman.
so you have thought this all out and your conclusion is that
over 60 republican led house and senate committees over the past 25 years
not to mention at least two special prosecutors have spent over $675 million
investigating the Clintons and they decided not to tell anyone about any of the
the lawbreaking and corruption they found. they decided to keep it a secret and
not let anyone know about, because they are so kind hearted towards the Clintons.

in fact they admire the Clintons so much they decided to make excuses
for their despised political adversaries. you have a much more benevolent opinion
of republicans than almost anyone else.

trump u. wants u herdman.
 
Last edited:
"saving the country" from hillary while offering trump as an alternative is not saving the country
 
$7,000,000, 2 years, 8 investigations, and we find Hillary doing the same thing as Colin Powell, minus the "blasphemy" of a private email server that so far caused no problems.
Yeah Powell did the exact same thing Clinton did. And you call everyone else a moron
 
"saving the country" from hillary while offering trump as an alternative is not saving the country

don't be to hard on trump eg - he and dennis Hastert are the two
most ethical republican politicians in the world.
 
don't be to hard on trump eg - he and dennis Hastert are the two
most ethical republican politicians in the world.

Dont get me wrong. I'm not calling trump unethical, just bigoted, unqualified, and a farce. :)
 
Explain how the Clintons are bigger slime balls than Reagan or Bush 2...........

Cliff Notes version.

1)Reagan required everyone who entered the oval office to wear a suit coat or sport coat. Bill Clinton got a knob job and sprayed himself all over an intern in the oval office and shoved a cigar up her pussy. Then his "wife" Crooked Hillary set out to bury the intern. Stay Class Clintons.

Under deposition and I quote: the President inserted a cigar into (Monica's) vagina and then put the cigar in his mouth and said, 'It tastes good.' "
2)Bush
pres_jogs_wounded_vet.jpg


Crooked Hillary

“I can’t imagine the grief she has about losing her son,” Clinton said. “But she’s wrong. She’s absolutely wrong!”

(way to empathize with a mother who lost a son Hillary you stupid cold heart bitch)
 
Cliff Notes version.

1)Reagan required everyone who entered the oval office to wear a suit coat or sport coat. Bill Clinton got a knob job and sprayed himself all over an intern in the oval office and shoved a cigar up her pussy. Then his "wife" Crooked Hillary set out to bury the intern. Stay Class Clintons.

Under deposition and I quote: the President inserted a cigar into (Monica's) vagina and then put the cigar in his mouth and said, 'It tastes good.' "
2)Bush
pres_jogs_wounded_vet.jpg


Crooked Hillary

“I can’t imagine the grief she has about losing her son,” Clinton said. “But she’s wrong. She’s absolutely wrong!”

(way to empathize with a mother who lost a son Hillary you stupid cold heart bitch)

Reagan sold arms to Iran while there was an arms embargo against Iran AND lied about it. But yeah, suit and tie. Yay.

And with Hillary, your suggestion is she tell the mother what? A lie?

Bush, jogging with a soldier he lied into war. Top notch.
 
Reagan sold arms to Iran while there was an arms embargo against Iran AND lied about it. But yeah, suit and tie. Yay.

And with Hillary, your suggestion is she tell the mother what? A lie?

Bush, jogging with a soldier he lied into war. Top notch.

No the wench could have not got on tv during a debate and screaming the woman is absolutely wrong. That's low class.

Looks like the soldier respected Bush.

Stop deflecting. There always seems to be slime that follows the slimes named Clinton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
Definition of Slime

slime
slīm/
noun
  1. 1.
    a moist, soft, and slippery substance, typically regarded as repulsive.
    "the cold stone was wet with slime"
    synonyms: ooze, sludge, muck, mud, mire; Bill and Hillary Clinton,
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
How so? No other Secretary of State used a private server housed in their bathroom like Clinton did. Whether you like to admit it or not that is the major difference between them. You just don't want to acknowledges aid difference
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
No the wench could have not got on tv during a debate and screaming the woman is absolutely wrong. That's low class.

Looks like the soldier respected Bush.

Stop deflecting. There always seems to be slime that follows the slimes named Clinton.

If Hillary whispers, you call it screaming.

Regardless of how the soldier felt, there is no slime as slimy as lying soldiers into war.

Synonym for herdman: clueless
 
If Hillary whispers, you call it screaming.

Regardless of how the soldier felt, there is no slime as slimy as lying soldiers into war.

Synonym for herdman: clueless

So what do you think of LB Johnson? Ever read about the Gulf of Tonkin? And soldiers do their job. Doesn't make a flip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
that so far caused no problems.

Espionage, and its affects, is a decades long process.

The people who defend Hillary don't get it. "It wasn't classified at the time" is a bunk. It's small, and yes, sometimes unclassified, pieces of intel that, when collected as a whole, can produce significant findings. That's why some of Hillary's emails were classified after the fact (and now redacted), and it's why official email/information is required to be on a secure system. I don't know why that's so hard to understand. That's not including the 22 emails that can't be released due to their classification. There's no way those 22 emails started out as SBU, then turned into something so sensitive they couldn't be released even in redacted versions.
 
How so? No other Secretary of State used a private server housed in their bathroom like Clinton did. Whether you like to admit it or not that is the major difference between them. You just don't want to acknowledges aid difference

This is what you said: "One used a private email EXCLUSIVELY and the other didn't."

Colin Powell used private email exclusively for his day to day business while at State. He didn't have a private server. That's how.
 
Powell did not exclusively use private email. That was apparently apparent in the IG findings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wisemaniac
pres_jogs_wounded_vet.jpg


IF IT WERE NOT FOR BUSH AND YOU BUSH CHEERLEADERS
THAT SOLDIER WOULD STILL HAVE HIS LEG.
 
Show me a picture of Obama doing the same. Show me a picture of Obama honoring Soldiers the way Bush has. Show me were Soldiers support Obama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
So what do you think of LB Johnson? Ever read about the Gulf of Tonkin? And soldiers do their job. Doesn't make a flip.

Do you also want to bring Grant, Washington, and Ghengis Khan into the discussion? Surely those guys screamed something at some time.

Soldiers get killed and maimed from wars they're lied into. That's what Bush and his admin did.
 
Espionage, and its affects, is a decades long process.

The people who defend Hillary don't get it. "It wasn't classified at the time" is a bunk. It's small, and yes, sometimes unclassified, pieces of intel that, when collected as a whole, can produce significant findings. That's why some of Hillary's emails were classified after the fact (and now redacted), and it's why official email/information is required to be on a secure system. I don't know why that's so hard to understand. That's not including the 22 emails that can't be released due to their classification. There's no way those 22 emails started out as SBU, then turned into something so sensitive they couldn't be released even in redacted versions.

Colin Powells emails weren't classified at the time either. So if it's bunk for hillary, it's bunk for powell. If it's a requirement to be on a secure system, then powell didn't meet that requirement either. I don't know why that's so hard to understand. And you do not know any more about the 22 emails than anyone else on this board.
 
Did I say Powell was exempt?

If the 22 emails are too sensitive to be released to the public (which is what Hillary claims she wanted to do with ALL her emails), even in redacted form, what does that tell you?
 
Did I say Powell was exempt?

If the 22 emails are too sensitive to be released to the public (which is what Hillary claims she wanted to do with ALL her emails), even in redacted form, what does that tell you?

If Powell isn't exempt, call on him to be prosecuted just like you cons are doing for hillary.

That the 22 emails can't be released does not prove anything except that for some reason they are found to be classified NOW.
 
You still don't get it. There's a reason that emails, phone calls, and such are held in a classified area, IE. a SCIF. Intelligence is a puzzle, it sometimes takes years or decades to build a 'case'. That's why every single little insignificant piece is classified. Quit being stubborn.
 
You still don't get it. There's a reason that emails, phone calls, and such are held in a classified area, IE. a SCIF. Intelligence is a puzzle, it sometimes takes years or decades to build a 'case'. That's why every single little insignificant piece is classified. Quit being stubborn.

No. You don't get it. Every little piece of not classified. Classified national security information is information created or received by an agency of the federal government or a government contractor that would damage national security if improperly released.
 
No. You don't get it. Every little piece of not classified. Classified national security information is information created or received by an agency of the federal government or a government contractor that would damage national security if improperly released.

This post proves my point that you don't understand that every piece of intel could be classified, and why it should be secured.
 
This post proves my point that you don't understand that every piece of intel could be classified, and why it should be secured.

Sure, it could be classified. But not necessarily at the time it was sent or received. Classifying something retroactively could deem nearly anything as classified. Government servers have been hacked several times. At this point you can't say the same thing about hillary's server.
 
Actually you just proved my point. No one knows what SHOULD be classified until the info is deemed relevant. That's why there's a time line dedicated even to the most mundane info, because it could be useful in the future. Hence, why a .gov or .mil is required.
 
Actually you just proved my point. No one knows what SHOULD be classified until the info is deemed relevant. That's why there's a time line dedicated even to the most mundane info, because it could be useful in the future. Hence, why a .gov or .mil is required.

No, I didn't. Based on the type of intelligence that produced the information, it is clear which agency owns it and it's up to that agency to decide whether it's classified.
 
No, I didn't. Based on the type of intelligence that produced the information, it is clear which agency owns it and it's up to that agency to decide whether it's classified.

But it's been shown that some of the intel wasn't St Dept's. This has been proven over and over.

State doesn't own SATINT, but the NK SATINT was on Hillary's server. Justify that.
 
Extra now googling "what is SATINT", "What does NK mean"
 
No, I didn't. Based on the type of intelligence that produced the information, it is clear which agency owns it and it's up to that agency to decide whether it's classified.

Are you the resident expert on classified materials?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT