ADVERTISEMENT

Any good gifs of Chuck Schumer crying?

giphy.gif
 
1.) nowhere in that video do i see Chuck Schumer crying
fail

2.) please post the exact law that the current order violates that she refused to enforce
 
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate ReleaseAugust 04, 2011
Presidential Proclamation--Suspension of Entry as Immigrants and Nonimmigrants of Persons Who Participate in Serious Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Violations and Other Abuses

SUSPENSION OF ENTRY AS IMMIGRANTS AND NONIMMIGRANTS OF PERSONS WHO PARTICIPATE IN SERIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMANITARIAN LAW VIOLATIONS AND OTHER ABUSES

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

The United States enduring commitment to respect for human rights and humanitarian law requires that its Government be able to ensure that the United States does not become a safe haven for serious violators of human rights and humanitarian law and those who engage in other related abuses. Universal respect for human rights and humanitarian law and the prevention of atrocities internationally promotes U.S. values and fundamental U.S. interests in helping secure peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises around the globe. I therefore have determined that it is in the interests of the United States to take action to restrict the international travel and to suspend the entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of certain persons who have engaged in the acts outlined in section 1 of this proclamation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 1 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. I therefore hereby proclaim that:

Section 1. The entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of the following persons is hereby suspended:

(a) Any alien who planned, ordered, assisted, aided and abetted, committed or otherwise participated in, including through command responsibility, widespread or systematic violence against any civilian population based in whole or in part on race; color; descent; sex; disability; membership in an indigenous group; language; religion; political opinion; national origin; ethnicity; membership in a particular social group; birth; or sexual orientation or gender identity, or who attempted or conspired to do so.

(b) Any alien who planned, ordered, assisted, aided and abetted, committed or otherwise participated in, including through command responsibility, war crimes, crimes against humanity or other serious violations of human rights, or who attempted or conspired to do so.

Sec. 2. Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply with respect to any person otherwise covered by section 1 where the entry of such person would not harm the foreign relations interests of the United States.

Sec. 3. The Secretary of State, or the Secretary's designee, in his or her sole discretion, shall identify persons covered by section 1 of this proclamation, pursuant to such standards and procedures as the Secretary may establish.

Sec. 4. The Secretary of State shall have responsibility for implementing this proclamation pursuant to such procedures as the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, may establish.

Sec. 5. For any person whose entry is otherwise suspended under this proclamation entry will be denied, unless the Secretary of State determines that the particular entry of such person would be in the interests of the United States. In exercising such authority, the Secretary of State shall consult the Secretary of Homeland Security on matters related to admissibility or inadmissibility within the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security.

Sec. 6. Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to derogate from United States Government obligations under applicable international agreements, or to suspend entry based solely on an alien's ideology, opinions, or beliefs, or based solely on expression that would be considered protected under U.S. interpretations of international agreements to which the United States is a party. Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to limit the authority of the United States to admit or to suspend entry of particular individuals into the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) or under any other provision of U.S. law.

Sec. 7. This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Sec. 8. This proclamation is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until such time as the Secretary of State determines that it is no longer necessary and should be terminated, either in whole or in part. Any such termination shall become effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.

BARACK OBAMA
 
1.) nowhere in that video do i see Chuck Schumer crying
fail

???????

2.) please post the exact law that the current order violates that she refused to enforce



"no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence."

"once on American soil, US and international law prohibits the deportation of non-citizens who can establish that they will face torture or persecution if returned home."

Due process
Other experts highlight the constitutional questions in play, especially for those who are currently detained at airports around the country.

And while the executive order does not explicitly ban all Muslims from entering the country, constitutional lawyers say Trump could have an equal protection problem on his hands if a court were to find that he is intentionally discriminating on the basis of national origin

by showing "preferential treatment" for Christian refugees seeking asylum over Muslims or by seeking to "disfavor a particular religion," the executive order would violate the Establishment Clause.
 
and as of today it is completely legal and she deserved to be fired for not doing her job.

It has not been determined if it's legal. Part of the ban has already been stayed by a court. There are no alternative facts. And it may turn out that she was fired for doing the right thing, which calls into question if she deserved to be fired. I don't know of anyone questioning the right to fire her.
 
It has not been determined if it's legal. Part of the ban has already been stayed by a court. There are no alternative facts. And it may turn out that she was fired for doing the right thing, which calls into question if she deserved to be fired. I don't know of anyone questioning the right to fire her.

It has been determined. Where do you come up with this shi*? Has a court determined that it must be done away with?

Plus, herjob is to defend the law and executive orders whether or not she agrees with them or not.

Classic case of insubordination. Easy grounds for
termination.

You talk about your business dealings. What would you do if you had a guy working for you that said, I am not going to do something that way because I don't believe what you told me, boss?
 
It has been determined. Where do you come up with this shi*? Has a court determined that it must be done away with?

Plus, herjob is to defend the law and executive orders whether or not she agrees with them or not.

Classic case of insubordination. Easy grounds for
termination.

You talk about your business dealings. What would you do if you had a guy working for you that said, I am not going to do something that way because I don't believe what you told me, boss?

The ban will be tried in court to see if it's legal or not. Several law suits have already been filed. Do you live in a cave?
 
EVERY Legal professional i have heard discuss this topic has stated that she should have stepped down. it was not her place to refuse the order and it was a "slap in the face" of the Legal community and the constitution. as a lawyer you have the obligation to represent your client regardless of your personal feelings or beliefs about what they did.

she should have stepped down. she will never have a "legitimate" job in the legal world again. look for her to be the chief council of the DNC or something similar.
 
The ban will be tried in court to see if it's legal or not. Several law suits have already been filed. Do you live in a cave?

and on the day she refused to comply with the order IT WAS 100% LEGAL.

you can't claim i did something illegal yesterday that you determine is illegal tomorrow.
 
and on the day she refused to comply with the order IT WAS 100% LEGAL.

you can't claim i did something illegal yesterday that you determine is illegal tomorrow.

Irrelevant. The courts will decide if it's constitutional. Does that make you feel better?
 
The ban will be tried in court to see if it's legal or not. Several law suits have already been filed. Do you live in a cave?

Ok until those courts rule then it is still legal and she didn't do her job and it is her(was) job to defend those orders.

Christ, do you know who the attorney general works for?
 
Ok until those courts rule then it is still legal and she didn't do her job and it is her(was) job to defend those orders.

Christ, do you know who the attorney general works for?

If it's still totally legal beyond doubt, why was part of it stayed? To determine if it's legal maybe?
 
That doesn't make you smart, that makes you and spineless henchman.

my Granddad got a bronze star and a purple heart in Korea doing just that. I would give ANYTHING if he were alive today to hear you say that to his face.
 
Greed cant go a month without bashing military men and women. He does know a lot about being spineless though. He's been a coward for years.
 
my Granddad got a bronze star and a purple heart in Korea doing just that. I would give ANYTHING if he were alive today to hear you say that to his face.

You're talking about war, moron, I'm not. My dad nearly died in Korea from grenade shrapnel.
 
You're talking about war, moron, I'm not. My dad nearly died in Korea from grenade shrapnel.

so a POTUS order only counts during wartime?

gottcha

my Pap got a Purple Heart from a grenade as well. his best friend was vaporized right beside him. would be some crazy shit if it was the same grenade.
 
so a POTUS order only counts during wartime?

So, you'd kill the foreman if the POTUS told you to do so in peace time?

my Pap got a Purple Heart from a grenade as well. his best friend was vaporized right beside him. would be some crazy shit if it was the same grenade.

The one that got my dad was was about the size of a 55 gallon drum...........

aid867205-728px-Throw-a-Grenade-on-Call-of-Duty-Step-4.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT