ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone want more proof Walz is a govt, teet sucking, communist? Here it is.

raleighherdfan

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 22, 2010
19,047
11,650
113
I'm not suggesting he has to be a multi millionaire-pelosi type politician, but not a single investment? Not $1 in an investment or fund? A home outside his govt provided Gov mansion? Nothing that would provide him retirement income outside his teacher pension and medicare? No Cash savings? Complete incompetence and mooch behavior.

This is the kind of person libs want providing guidance and input on business legislation, budgets, spending, investments etc? Someone so dependent on taxpayer money for his own long-term welfare, puts no faith or investing his own $$ in things that make America....America. Write a book or something (no one will read) to earn something you can claim you've done. Even Greedtard has the balls to own a hobby and produce something. Walz is an incompetent mooch.
 
I'm not suggesting he has to be a multi millionaire-pelosi type politician, but not a single investment? Not $1 in an investment or fund? A home outside his govt provided Gov mansion? Nothing that would provide him retirement income outside his teacher pension and medicare? No Cash savings? Complete incompetence and mooch behavior.

This is the kind of person libs want providing guidance and input on business legislation, budgets, spending, investments etc? Someone so dependent on taxpayer money for his own long-term welfare, puts no faith or investing his own $$ in things that make America....America. Write a book or something (no one will read) to earn something you can claim you've done. Even Greedtard has the balls to own a hobby and produce something. Walz is an incompetent mooch.
So when a politician makes money from investing while in office, you cry. When a politician doesn’t make money from investing while in office, you cry. You realize that when it comes to Dems, you’ll find fault regardless even if it means contradicting yourself, right?

Both the guy and his wife will receive teacher pensions which will probably give them $100k+ annually in retirement in a low cost of living area. He will also receive a military pension and the political pension.

They’ve clearly planned well with their future based on knowing they will have more than enough in pensions to be able to live care-free.
 
I'm not suggesting he has to be a multi millionaire-pelosi type politician, but not a single investment? Not $1 in an investment or fund? A home outside his govt provided Gov mansion? Nothing that would provide him retirement income outside his teacher pension and medicare? No Cash savings? Complete incompetence and mooch behavior.

This is the kind of person libs want providing guidance and input on business legislation, budgets, spending, investments etc? Someone so dependent on taxpayer money for his own long-term welfare, puts no faith or investing his own $$ in things that make America....America. Write a book or something (no one will read) to earn something you can claim you've done. Even Greedtard has the balls to own a hobby and produce something. Walz is an incompetent mooch.
You're an idiot.
 
So we’ve gone from hating the rich coastal elite to hating the poor midwestern teachers I see. Guess it’s good to see the mask come off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
So when a politician makes money from investing while in office, you cry. When a politician doesn’t make money from investing while in office, you cry. You realize that when it comes to Dems, you’ll find fault regardless even if it means contradicting yourself, right?

Both the guy and his wife will receive teacher pensions which will probably give them $100k+ annually in retirement in a low cost of living area. He will also receive a military pension and the political pension.

They’ve clearly planned well with their future based on knowing they will have more than enough in pensions to be able to live care-free.
You're bad at this. Reading comprehension isn't your thing. I'm not contradicting anything moron. No one is suggesting he should be trading on insider information the way Pelosi does. There are ways to invest and save separate from trading individual stocks. This is a guy who worked for years (BEFORE being elected) and fails to have $1 in anything outside of taxpayer funded pensions. He had no idea he would be in govt paying him a "political" pensions.

You want a guy this inept and incompetent at planning for his future, helping to set financial policies on taxes, businesses, and individuals for FUTURE generations??
 
You're bad at this. Reading comprehension isn't your thing. I'm not contradicting anything moron. No one is suggesting he should be trading on insider information the way Pelosi does. There are ways to invest and save separate from trading individual stocks. This is a guy who worked for years (BEFORE being elected) and fails to have $1 in anything outside of taxpayer funded pensions. He had no idea he would be in govt paying him a "political" pensions.

You want a guy this inept and incompetent at planning for his future, helping to set financial policies on taxes, businesses, and individuals for FUTURE generations??
Baldy, greed et al would vote for turnip if it had a D in front of name
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT and rvntx
So we’ve gone from hating the rich coastal elite to hating the poor midwestern teachers I see. Guess it’s good to see the mask come off.
Christ. You guys are mindless rubes. No one is "hating" anyone. He isn't competent at leading at this level. He's done little to nothing to prepare financially for himself other than accepting tax dollars. You want this guy establishing policy that will financially impact you and your children's future? Like I said. Even Greedtard has owned a business. This guy has ZERO assets.

Speaking of mask coming off....This guy would want you to wear one 24/7. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
Christ. You guys are mindless rubes. No one is "hating" anyone. He isn't competent at leading at this level. He's done little to nothing to prepare financially for himself other than accepting tax dollars. You want this guy establishing policy that will financially impact you and your children's future? Like I said. Even Greedtard has owned a business. This guy has ZERO assets.

Speaking of mask coming off....This guy would want you to wear one 24/7. Carry on.
You're an idiot.
 
So 20 years from now $100,000 a year will have him covered comfortably, rifle?
 
It would far more comforting as a citizen if Walz would sit down & do a long-form interview so Americans can get a feel for his understanding of how markets work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
It would far more comforting as a citizen if Walz would sit down & do a long-form interview so Americans can get a feel for his understanding of how markets work.
They do not to exposed that total lack of knowledge
 
Christ. You guys are mindless rubes. No one is "hating" anyone. He isn't competent at leading at this level. He's done little to nothing to prepare financially for himself other than accepting tax dollars. You want this guy establishing policy that will financially impact you and your children's future? Like I said. Even Greedtard has owned a business. This guy has ZERO assets.
Do the math, moron.

Walz (and presumably his wife) taught in Minnesota from 1996 to 2006. For teachers with 2 - 12+ years of experience like they had, how much do you think they were making annually during that time period? My guess is that they each averaged about $55k during those years, in that location, during that time period.

Here is the house listing that they bought in 1997 and sold in 2019:


It's reasonable that they either owned it at that point or had a very low balance on their mortgage, so it is fair to assume they walked away with at least $250k from that.

They raised two children in that house on that $110k annual estimated salary. After taxes and low insurance costs (most school districts have decent insurance for family for low cost), it means they walked away with about $6600/month after taxes. With a 15 year mortgage, they were paying about $2000/month. Utilities (electricity, gas, water, phone, internet, cable, etc.) would be about $600. Two cars, fuel, and insurance? Another $1300. Food for four people monthly, including one family night out per week? $1000. Clothing, recreation, events, vacations, children's sports dues/equipment, etc. for a family of four? I think a monthly average of $800 seems reasonable for four people. Home/vehicle maintenance/repairs? $200 per month for the house and two cars. That leaves about $700 extra per month.

Walz's father entered the military in order get his college paid for. That's also why Walz entered the military, as his dad urged him to do it for the GI bill. It isn't unreasonable to think they used some of that extra monthly income to help put their daughter though college.

$700/month isn't much to put in a 401k or other investments, especially if a portion of that is going into a college fund for your children and a bank account for an emergency fund.

Your claim that the guy has zero assets shows a lack of knowledge on the topic. The guy could have $500k in his bank account - not tied into investments - and that is an asset. It just isn't stock or property. As I just showed, the guy walked away with $250k+ from his property transaction five years ago. Do you think that money just disappeared even though he was living in a house for free during that time? Of course not.

The guy nor his wife were high-income earners. They had a solid middle class lifestyle with their income. If he knew he would be getting a teacher pension (from his wife and possibly his own) and a military pension, there is no need for him to invest the small leftover balance he had after normal bills.

So 20 years from now $100,000 a year will have him covered comfortably, rifle?
You don't know how government pensions work, huh? 20 years from now - assuming normal inflation - his pension will also be higher. Government pensions, just like social security, has inflation adjustments. So it's safe to assume their pension is $120k annually 20 years from now. Yes, they will be more than fine.
 
Do the math, moron.

Walz (and presumably his wife) taught in Minnesota from 1996 to 2006. For teachers with 2 - 12+ years of experience like they had, how much do you think they were making annually during that time period? My guess is that they each averaged about $55k during those years, in that location, during that time period.

Here is the house listing that they bought in 1997 and sold in 2019:


It's reasonable that they either owned it at that point or had a very low balance on their mortgage, so it is fair to assume they walked away with at least $250k from that.

They raised two children in that house on that $110k annual estimated salary. After taxes and low insurance costs (most school districts have decent insurance for family for low cost), it means they walked away with about $6600/month after taxes. With a 15 year mortgage, they were paying about $2000/month. Utilities (electricity, gas, water, phone, internet, cable, etc.) would be about $600. Two cars, fuel, and insurance? Another $1300. Food for four people monthly, including one family night out per week? $1000. Clothing, recreation, events, vacations, children's sports dues/equipment, etc. for a family of four? I think a monthly average of $800 seems reasonable for four people. Home/vehicle maintenance/repairs? $200 per month for the house and two cars. That leaves about $700 extra per month.

Walz's father entered the military in order get his college paid for. That's also why Walz entered the military, as his dad urged him to do it for the GI bill. It isn't unreasonable to think they used some of that extra monthly income to help put their daughter though college.

$700/month isn't much to put in a 401k or other investments, especially if a portion of that is going into a college fund for your children and a bank account for an emergency fund.

Your claim that the guy has zero assets shows a lack of knowledge on the topic. The guy could have $500k in his bank account - not tied into investments - and that is an asset. It just isn't stock or property. As I just showed, the guy walked away with $250k+ from his property transaction five years ago. Do you think that money just disappeared even though he was living in a house for free during that time? Of course not.

The guy nor his wife were high-income earners. They had a solid middle class lifestyle with their income.
Wow. All this to admit he doesn't have the experience or knowledge to be a VP of the country. If he had "500K" sitting in an account, why was that not disclosed on the asset forms showing assets? Either he has assets or he doesn't. But the form he released to the media says....0 Assets. Not even a CD? Not a govt treasury bill???? From 2006 until now he's done nothing to accumulate additional assets even with a nice pay increase from his time in congress or governorship according to the forms he filed?? (He's a socialist that wants the govt taking care of him.)

Again, the guy chose to put nothing-0- nada into an IRA, 401k in all his years of employment, should be troubling. He did nothing to invest in his own self-reliance and independence, choosing to hope that a promise of redistributed govt tax money would be enough and rubes like you think he should now be elected to the world's #2 post establishing policies & leadership that will impact $$$trillions and millions of people who've chosen a responsible act of additional savings and planning for their future generations? Amazing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Only a rube and moron would suggest someone who has built and led an organization to $billions in net worth to have zero knowledge or experience. Shit. Greedtard has more experience than Walz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT and rvntx
Only a lying idiot phlegmwad would attempt to discredit someone who has served in Congress and as a state governor as not having the experience and knowledge to govern while supporting and defending someone who had zero.
 
Wow. All this to admit he doesn't have the experience or knowledge to be a VP of the country. If he had "500K" sitting in an account, why was that not disclosed on the asset forms showing assets? Either he has assets or he doesn't. But the form he released to the media says....0 Assets. Not even a CD? Not a govt treasury bill???? From 2006 until now he's done nothing to accumulate additional assets even with a nice pay increase from his time in congress or governorship according to the forms he filed?? (He's a socialist that wants the govt taking care of him.)
Either you don't understand the process or you are purposely misleading and misrepresenting. Regular savings/checking accounts aren't commonly listed. When was his last asset list release? 2017? 2019? As I correctly guessed, he has a college savings account, multiple pensions, and one or two life insurance policies other than his bank account(s).

Is the guy wealthy? Nope. Should that matter? Very, very little. Could not having wealth open him up to corruption? Possibly. But considering he has turned down cost-of-living increases to his government salary each year and just turned down a $20k+ salary increase as governor for the same, I wouldn't think he would be willing to break the law for some more money considering he has turned down over $100k in legal salary increases over the past decade.

And again, when the guy/his wife have multiple healthy pensions, why would he need anything more than his savings/emergency account and the college fund he has for his children? For people making the amount that I correctly guesstimated (his wife makes far less than what I guessed), there isn't much room to put in investments.

You're simply attempting a nothingburger with this. The guy was a fvcking teacher. They don't get wealthy pay. Even at that, his net worth appears healthy, especially when considering they have 2-3 pensions to rely on:

 
Either you don't understand the process or you are purposely misleading and misrepresenting. Regular savings/checking accounts aren't commonly listed. When was his last asset list release? 2017? 2019? As I correctly guessed, he has a college savings account, multiple pensions, and one or two life insurance policies other than his bank account(s).

Is the guy wealthy? Nope. Should that matter? Very, very little. Could not having wealth open him up to corruption? Possibly. But considering he has turned down cost-of-living increases to his government salary each year and just turned down a $20k+ salary increase as governor for the same, I wouldn't think he would be willing to break the law for some more money considering he has turned down over $100k in legal salary increases over the past decade.

And again, when the guy/his wife have multiple healthy pensions, why would he need anything more than his savings/emergency account and the college fund he has for his children? For people making the amount that I correctly guesstimated (his wife makes far less than what I guessed), there isn't much room to put in investments.

You're simply attempting a nothingburger with this. The guy was a fvcking teacher. They don't get wealthy pay. Even at that, his net worth appears healthy, especially when considering they have 2-3 pensions to rely on:

^^will support anyone they provide for him^^

Sheep Eating GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
While you helped elect and still support a former president that had zero knowledge and zero experience in governing. Idiot.
Neither did George Washington. That is what the founding fathers wanted. Get elected from your occupation and go home at the end of your term. Lifelong politicians are part of our problem. They wanted people to be farmers, business owners, doctors, etc and go represent the people and then go home.

the problem with the left is they want the govt to be the center of the universe. I like the state legislatures that are part time and go home.

What I said is what the million bureaucrats' fear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Neither did George Washington.
Your stupidity is beyond words. Seriously, you're a complete idiot, trumptard, and oath breaker.

Washington was first elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1758 as a representative of Frederick County. He was later elected by Fairfax County landholders and served a total of sixteen years in the colonial assembly.
 
Either you don't understand the process or you are purposely misleading and misrepresenting. Regular savings/checking accounts aren't commonly listed. When was his last asset list release? 2017? 2019? As I correctly guessed, he has a college savings account, multiple pensions, and one or two life insurance policies other than his bank account(s).

Is the guy wealthy? Nope. Should that matter? Very, very little. Could not having wealth open him up to corruption? Possibly. But considering he has turned down cost-of-living increases to his government salary each year and just turned down a $20k+ salary increase as governor for the same, I wouldn't think he would be willing to break the law for some more money considering he has turned down over $100k in legal salary increases over the past decade.

And again, when the guy/his wife have multiple healthy pensions, why would he need anything more than his savings/emergency account and the college fund he has for his children? For people making the amount that I correctly guesstimated (his wife makes far less than what I guessed), there isn't much room to put in investments.

You're simply attempting a nothingburger with this. The guy was a fvcking teacher. They don't get wealthy pay. Even at that, his net worth appears healthy, especially when considering they have 2-3 pensions to rely on:

I'm not misleading anything. I've been straight to the point with my assertions. I understand completely.
1) According to Forbes his net worth is less than the average American. It's not "healthy". It's below avg.
2) I'm not suggesting as an avg American he has to be super "wealthy". The issue I have is I actually expect the #2 in command of the world's leading superpower, to be (at least) ABOVE AVERAGE in his own financial planning and knowledgeable about finances in some capacity. The fact he's done nothing significant besides owning a house is troubling. As I said, the world's eventual #2 will be in charge of ultimately assisting to "lead" an economy with and GDP of $25trillion and the guy has a "checking account" as his only asset.
3) Not sure what a "teacher" has to do with it. There are teacher's that have built $multimillion investment portfolios (which is not what I'm suggesting he have). He hasn't been a teacher since 2006. Plenty of time to accrue something...somewhere.
4) I'm not even concerned about the corruption issue. Why? He doesn't appear knowledgeable enough to comprehend a corruption scheme he could profit from. Besides, he's a democrat. Not one person in the party seems concerned about their party leaders profiting millions from deals while in office. It will be no different for him.
5)The guy has been in congress making a healthy salary since the early 2000s and Gov after that. Does he not even have the faith and trust in the US or Minnesota to buy a govt bond??? A CD from a govt employees credit union?????

This is just so interesting. A party of self-proclaimed, proud elitist, who have openly mocked middle class "deplorables"; now promoting one of their own financially inept deplorables to the top and making excuses for it. You know, that's RICH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Your stupidity is beyond words. Seriously, you're a complete idiot, trumptard, and oath breaker.

Washington was first elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1758 as a representative of Frederick County. He was later elected by Fairfax County landholders and served a total of sixteen years in the colonial assembly.
When did America become a country, dipstick? He was basically a Commonwealth legislator in terms of political experience before the USA was even a country?

Stop worshipping at the alter of government. It is not the be all end all. People Like Mush Biden are a big part of the problem. Lifelong govt people who have never created a job, never really worked outside of govt in their adult life. They have no other perspective other than to grow the govt and feed the beast.

This county was built around the concept of the individual, not the federal govt.
 
1) According to Forbes his net worth is less than the average American. It's not "healthy". It's below avg.
You must have been tutored on data and statistical analysis by Banker, huh, piece of shit moron? Anybody with a clue knows not to look at average in this type of view. Median is the far more logical view.

Here, let me explain:
My IQ: 250
Your IQ: 90
Kitty's IQ: 80
1988's IQ: 70
Muthed's IQ: 60

Average: 110
Median: 80

So if you talk about us a group of posters, our average IQ is 110, which is well above average. However, 80% (4 out of 5) of that group is below average with their IQ. The average is neither a fair nor logical way to view that group of posters.

The median is a far better view.

Yes, Walz's financial situation (assuming he has a savings/checking account with at least $30k), is definitely healthy. He has no debts (or at least regarding properties), and most likely has three pensions. With their income level and void of the biggest taker (housing), he is in a great situation. Those pensions can add nearly a million dollars to his net worth.
2) I'm not suggesting as an avg American he has to be super "wealthy". The issue I have is I actually expect the #2 in command of the world's leading superpower, to be (at least) ABOVE AVERAGE in his own financial planning and knowledgeable about finances in some capacity. The fact he's done nothing significant besides owning a house is troubling. As I said, the world's eventual #2 will be in charge of ultimately assisting to "lead" an economy with and GDP of $25trillion and the guy has a "checking account" as his only asset.
You've already exposed yourself as a piece of shit human for the board to see, so thanks for exposing yourself as a hypocrite, too. Where were your comments about Mike Pence? When Pence took office as VP, he had over $100k in loans, no property ownership, a very low amount in bank accounts, and a state pension. Yet there were crickets on here.

This is just so interesting. A party of self-proclaimed, proud elitist, who have openly mocked middle class "deplorables"; now promoting one of their own financially inept deplorables to the top and making excuses for it. You know, that's RICH.


We don't mock middle-class. We mock deplorables who are middle-class, because they're not only one major issue away from economic bankruptcy, but they are also ethically bankrupt.

Walz isn't a deplorable by any means, and with his pension, he is better off than the majority of Americans.
 
You must have been tutored on data and statistical analysis by Banker, huh, piece of shit moron? Anybody with a clue knows not to look at average in this type of view. Median is the far more logical view.

Here, let me explain:
My IQ: 250
Your IQ: 90
Kitty's IQ: 80
1988's IQ: 70
Muthed's IQ: 60

Average: 110
Median: 80

So if you talk about us a group of posters, our average IQ is 110, which is well above average. However, 80% (4 out of 5) of that group is below average with their IQ. The average is neither a fair nor logical way to view that group of posters.

The median is a far better view.

Yes, Walz's financial situation (assuming he has a savings/checking account with at least $30k), is definitely healthy. He has no debts (or at least regarding properties), and most likely has three pensions. With their income level and void of the biggest taker (housing), he is in a great situation. Those pensions can add nearly a million dollars to his net worth.

You've already exposed yourself as a piece of shit human for the board to see, so thanks for exposing yourself as a hypocrite, too. Where were your comments about Mike Pence? When Pence took office as VP, he had over $100k in loans, no property ownership, a very low amount in bank accounts, and a state pension. Yet there were crickets on here.




We don't mock middle-class. We mock deplorables who are middle-class, because they're not only one major issue away from economic bankruptcy, but they are also ethically bankrupt.

Walz isn't a deplorable by any means, and with his pension, he is better off than the majority of Americans.
Well we all know due to your modest upbringing in rural NY you have a distorted view of wealth so your blather is not surprising. Other than that I see you still got it bad for me.

Warning Red Flag GIF
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT