BEAT THE FREEZE
- Thread starter dherd
- Start date
That's basically how you were before and after the election.
That you are a pussy bitch that couldn't take his lumps like a man after the election.
You said I didn't vote which was wrong. I'm sorry I didn't think there was anyone on the ballot capable of running the country
That's one of your dumber posts this year, which isn't an easy feat.
Claim Hillary was deceiving, sketchy, dishonest, corrupt, etc. I can understand that. But claiming she couldn't run the country?
Hillary was one of the brightest candidates this country has had in decades. She was also one of the more experienced politicians. Her intelligence, political relationships, political experience, and wildcard (Billy as her husband) would have allowed her to thrive in the position. Sure, she may have found a way for her family to profit immensely, but she was more than capable of running the country.
POOR BABY - YOU REALLY ARE UPSET ARENT YOU.
BETTER NOT LET YOUR MOTHER HEAR YOU TALKING LIKE
THAT - SHE WONT LET YOU DRIVE THE CAR FOR A MONTH.
Malarkey. You knew the republican couldn't run the country. That's all you knew.
Trumps incompetent. Hillary is as corrupt as they come. Therefore in my opinion neither one of them can run the country
He did exactly what people should do if they dislike the candidates or know nothing about them in a particular race. At least he showed up.
I really think we should have a NOTA option on every race. And election results should include all ballots with no choice in a race. Technically this is recorded, and anyone can do the math to figure it out, but that shit should be plastered on the front page of the paper along with the votes for each candidate.
No. He did not do the right thing. "none of the above" is unable to hold office. You're going to get one of those on the ballot as president. Choose one.
In the case of knowing nothing about the candidates, granted. But that wasn't the case. He didn't vote for cheetos because he was unfit, he didn't vote for hillary simply because she's a democrat.
Really? Hillary was such a strong woman she stayed with her husband who was banging everything in site so she could ride his coat tails into office. How cheap is that? She put up with it so she could stay in power. Her only experience was was staying with Bill.
Such a strong woman? My ass.
Why should a voter give his vote, his blood right, to someone he finds unfit or abhorrent? That is illogical and IMO disrespectful of one's vote. This lesser of two evils mindset shit needs to stop, acceptance of it is the greatest impediment to demanding better.
Her only experience was:
8 years as First Lady
8 years as U S senator
4 years as Secretary of State
It's illogical to vote for neither, since one of them WILL certainly hold the office.
So she knew what needed to be done in order to get what she wanted, and then she actually followed through in doing that? Cheeto should try that.
Welcome to Politics 101.
Her only experience was staying with her husband? You should be excluded from any other political discussions.
if she would have left him, like most others, what would she have become? An ex first lady.
Without Bill she was nothing and never would have been.
She also ran the worst campaign ever. Should have never lost to Trump.
Hell, she lost to a skinny black kid whose biggest claim to fame was being a community organizer. Left wing kooks simply need to realize that the American public is sick and damn tired of the Clintons.
By this logic, you shouldn't bitch about Trump. He WILL be in office anyway. Just accept it, man.
Yep, and all these girlie men were 'with her', including Rifle. Well, right up until the time he decided to be 'with Kathy'.
Hills couldn't even become partner of a law firm until after her hubby became Gov of Arkansas.
Politics 101....attach yourself to a talented (real) politician and ride the coat tails claiming victim all the way.
Politics 101....attach yourself to a talented (real) politician and ride the coat tails claiming victim all the way.
here's the deal.
if trump was a democrat and clinton was a republican
all these russian trolls would vote for clinton and bad
mouth trump, but dems would still vote for clinton.
the bottom line is that it is not about whats best for a safe and
prosperous america with the trolls, they are all in to weaken
america and strengthen russia. they dont care about the candidate
or the candidates qualifications they only see dem & republiputin.
if trump was a democrat and clinton was a republican
all these russian trolls would vote for clinton and bad
mouth trump, but dems would still vote for clinton.
the bottom line is that it is not about whats best for a safe and
prosperous america with the trolls, they are all in to weaken
america and strengthen russia. they dont care about the candidate
or the candidates qualifications they only see dem & republiputin.
Yale Law, partner at a fairly large firm, Bill routinely claimed that she was far brighter than he was. Yeah, she was clearly nothing.
She graduated from Yale Law in 1973. She didn't become part of a firm until 1976. She became partner 3 years later.
Her rise to partner was faster than usual. Do you really expect attorneys to become partner within three years of joining a firm and less than seven years after finishing law school? Doing that would be rare. She was ahead of the usual curve. If you're going to take jabs at her, at least have them make sense.
Oh, so she isn't a real politician? I thought that was what your kind wanted this time around? How's that working out for you guys? You rednecks are still rednecks; those damn Muslims are still coming into the country; and you're still having daily meetings with experts in every field and industry ever discussed on here.
Thanks to Bill..
Yes, she's a real (terrible) politician. Which is exactly why she got beat by a couple of political neophytes when the biggest office in the world was up for grabs. Of course, she should count her blessings. If it wasn't for her husband she would have never had a chance to sniff the white house.
Your illogic accomplishes nothing. Since one of them will take office, you choose the one you believe will do the least harm. There is zero virtue in not voting.
It's really not up for debate. She is far brighter. Hell, want to compare how they did in law school?
This shows how illogical your argument is. You faulted her for not being able to make partner until her husband became governor. Yet, virtually nobody would have been able to make partner that fast. Then, when she made partner a year or two after he became governor, you claim that it was only because of Bill being governor.
If there were any favoritism given to her in being named partner that wasn't deserved, one would think it would come far sooner than a year or two after Bill was governor, especially since he lost the position at around the same time.
You're damning her if she does, damning her if she doesn't. It's intellectually dishonest, but I am sure you had a meeting this afternoon (and tomorrow and the next day and the next day) with the managing partner of her firm at the time.
The voter is voting. I didn't say don't give a toss and not show up at the polls; that's apathy. Going in and saying "fvck both these guys" is the opposite of apathy, which has "zero virtue".
Accepting the least harm is accepting mediocrity. Fvck that. Maybe you can sleep at night putting your X and signature next to a piece of shit; I take my vote a little more seriously than that. Face it: you are a shitty patriot, shrugging your shoulders and voting for duds.
Like a lot of your political arguments, I get the feeling this one is born of butthurt your candidate did not win. "If only people realized Hillary would do the least harm!" Fvck her. And fvck your party for making that the best option you all had. Thanks, assholes.
BTW, Nevada actually does have the option of "None of These Candidates". I'd rate that higher than gambling and a little below legal whores in assessment of good things about Nevada. All that, and now legal weed, too. It's hotter than balls there, but they seem to have a decent grasp of how freedom actually works.
yes. Being "damned" in more than one way is very possible. Especially when you're not very good at what you do.
Thanks Bill.
Yes. That would keep me from having to verbalize, "well, fvck both these guys" just to get my view across, or writing in my own name when I would never want the damn job.
Less voters are killed by drunk drivers than Killary Apologists every year, so your statement is false.
First the Kathy is hot posts and now this. You've seriously lost your mind.
