Sam do you ever read anything or do you just read the first sentence and say oh oh oh I gottem!!!!
I’m talking about this round of conference realignment.
Texas and Oklahoma were about football. The Big 12 took 3 of the best football teams in the AAC and a nationally known G5 independent. That was about Football not TV markets. The AAC has been far and away the best G5 conference for the last few years lead by UCF and Cincinnati.
The AAC cannot afford to replace those programs with crap programs. They have got to go out and replace those 3 programs with strong G5 programs in football. If they go for market share and pick Charlotte or somebody like that for “market share” they will return to the G5 pack and will lose any national notoriety they have been building.
Appy, Boise and Marshall make the most sense to replace those 3 and you will see very little drop off in production.
I would say the Big 12 took the most money generating programs, because Big 12 doesn't want to lose their coveted P5 status (which they could still lose), and thats based heavily on how much money you can make and not necessarily how good your football program is.
Hence why Texas got invited, their football team isn't nearly as good, and not even near the level of the SEC.
But money? Absolutely, they far outsell the SEC...or anyone for that matter.
2 programs in OU and UT were carrying the weight/value of a WHOLE CONFERENCE. Let that sink in for a moment.
Big 12 has to replace that, with programs that didn't hold the value before (hence no expansion), and likely may not even today, but they'll hope to come close.
As for us and the AAC?
If I'm not mistaken, ECU is the lowest in terms of spending money...and they have very little to show for it.
Their spending far exceeds ours, so what makes you think MU can keep up?
MU isn't exactly a desireable destination for a long term HC.
App State, same question.
App had the luck of having good coaches, but will that last? Look at a G5 who had a good HC and they couldn't find a good replacement (WMU and that boaty mcboatface trend anyone?).
Boise being part of the AAC, isn't even a sure thing and is it worth it for them, to increase travel expenses going as far away as Tampa, FL when they are usually top dog in the MWC?
I do agree, MU has remained consistent enough to be considered and be a strong candidate for the AAC, but going there will require some major changes MU must make, and is the school and are the fans, prepared for what that means?