...it's easy to envision the person with a terminal cancer like a GBM that is having headaches, seizures, just miserable....
But what about something like a multiple myeloma where "terminal" patients can live many years. Like say this patient keeps getting admitted to the hospital, has pretty poor quality of life, but can clearly see they are a burden to their family with all the doctors appointments, money, time, etc they are "costing" everyone. However, this patient still wants to live and continue on with treatments to prolong life.
They had never considered assisted suicide as an option at all, but then they start considering it because it is legal. Is this patient better off because it's an option? Or did we make the whole situation worse because now they have the option?
There are some good medical ethics podcasts on this stuff if anyone is interested. Really tough situations and things to consider.
I'm not an expert on this stuff and certainly don't know Canada's laws on this, but I've heard compelling arguments from both sides on thsi.