ADVERTISEMENT

CNN interview on Kavanaugh

I did, but still surprised 4 of the 5 had the response they did. Normally women band together when these things come up
 
I've had a few conversations with females on the left about this. They all seem to despise Kavanaugh. When I ask point blank if they think this is fair to him, a question I've asked a number of people, they are hesitant to answer.
 
Their reactions are consistent with the women I've spoken to about this - Dems and Repubs.
 
Avenatti said he is "aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the early 1980s, during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs to allow a 'train' of men to subsequently gang rape them."

"There are multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly," Avenatti wrote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUSerg
Avenatti said he is "aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the early 1980s, during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs to allow a 'train' of men to subsequently gang rape them."

"There are multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly," Avenatti wrote.

That's right, folks, a serial gang-rapist! Flew under the radar for 40 years until the democrats needed a hail mary to prevent an appointment to the Supreme Court.
 
That's right, folks, a serial gang-rapist! Flew under the radar for 40 years until the democrats needed a hail mary to prevent an appointment to the Supreme Court.
Isn't it laughable. Where do they come up with this stuff. Pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
Would seem to me you would lead with the "criminal mastermind who ran a collegiate gang-rape ring" instead of making it the third accusation lobbed at the guy.
 
Bullies in the restaurant. You have to stand up to them. Bunch of losers! The restaurant should have thrown their asses out on the curb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thunderscope
The guy should be mocked until he quits politics. Anyone who claims that they govern based on what their god tells them to do, runs for president because his god sent his wife a sign, etc. is batshit crazy.

I enjoyed seeing this billboard every day in Texas:

4wLln1s.jpg
 
The guy should be mocked until he quits politics. Anyone who claims that they govern based on what their god tells them to do, runs for president because his god sent his wife a sign, etc. is batshit crazy.

I enjoyed seeing this billboard every day in Texas:

4wLln1s.jpg
Do you approve of the actions of the protesters while he was eating dinner with his wife?
 
Do you approve of the actions of the protesters while he was eating dinner with his wife?

Before I answer, let me ask you this:

You have no problem with a business owner (bakery owner, etc.) refusing to do business with anyone they don’t agree with based on politics, religion, sexual identify, race, etc. After all, they can just choose to go to a business where their money is appreciated, right?

So do you have a problem with a restaurant owner who allows his patrons to mock other customers whose political, religious, etc. stances they don’t agree with? After all, if they don’t like it, they can just choose to go to another business where their money and company is appreciated, right?

Shows the intellect of the protestors. Not smart to piss off a possible future supreme court justice.

That makes absolutely no sense, moron.
 
Before I answer, let me ask you this:

You have no problem with a business owner (bakery owner, etc.) refusing to do business with anyone they don’t agree with based on politics, religion, sexual identify, race, etc. After all, they can just choose to go to a business where their money is appreciated, right?

So do you have a problem with a restaurant owner who allows his patrons to mock other customers whose political, religious, etc. stances they don’t agree with? After all, if they don’t like it, they can just choose to go to another business where their money and company is appreciated, right?



That makes absolutely no sense, moron.

Bingo. I wonder what the distinction is. If it's ok to deny services to someone based on their race, religion, sexual orientation, or gender, what's the big deal if you discriminate against someone just based on different political opinions?
 
maybe russiacons should try putting forth a nominee who isnt a traitor, a crook,
someone who brags about sexual assault and rape, doesnt subvert the constitution,
and every american norm, take orders from putin, lie 200 times a day isnt a h.s.
pervert who drugs women and gang rapes them, lies dozens of times in front of
senate committees and a fraud.

maybe if russiacons stop putting forth these kinds of people just so they can
rig the courts in favor of large corporations against hard working americans
who make america great people wouldn't feel the need to protest their rigged
system.
 
A couple things. This situation and the bake the cake situation are in no way related. This is a mob rule denial of service. This wasn’t done by the owner of the restaurant based on religious convictions. It was done by a group of people interrupting THE ENTIRE RESTAURANT. Secondly do you libs think this honestly plays well with the vast majority of people? Do you think that’s a winning strategy to Convince people to join your cause?
 
maybe russiacons should try putting forth a nominee who isnt a traitor, a crook,
someone who brags about sexual assault and rape, doesnt subvert the constitution,
and every american norm, take orders from putin, lie 200 times a day isnt a h.s.
pervert who drugs women and gang rapes them, lies dozens of times in front of
senate committees and a fraud.

maybe if russiacons stop putting forth these kinds of people just so they can
rig the courts in favor of large corporations against hard working americans
who make america great people wouldn't feel the need to protest their rigged
system.
you just described the clintons, dumbfvck.
 
You have no problem with a business owner (bakery owner, etc.) refusing to do business with anyone they don’t agree with based on politics, religion, sexual identify, race, etc. After all, they can just choose to go to a business where their money is appreciated, right?

So do you have a problem with a restaurant owner who allows his patrons to mock other customers whose political, religious, etc. stances they don’t agree with? After all, if they don’t like it, they can just choose to go to another business where their money and company is appreciated, right?

Let me say I believe both are bad business decisions.

However, attempting to claim both of these situations are similar is less than accurate.

First, a business owner deciding to say "no" to a potential customer is not mocking, heckling, running someone off the premises.

Two, these "protestors" don't appear to "patrons" of the restaurant. They appear to be off the street. There is a good chance the "owner" wasn't even there. These types of people are a bigger public disturbance than any "cake decorator". Having idiots making a scene like this in your business is a losing proposition all around.
 
i can see the libs on this board acting like that and being proud of themselves. what a bunch of mentally deranged lunatic pansies.
 
Do you approve of the actions of the protesters while he was eating dinner with his wife?

Of course he does, but he will spin it to try not to make himself look bad, because he knows their actions are egregious. Libs pride themselves in peace, love and kindness to all. They believe in treating everyone fairly and with respect. They love you so much, they're willing to kill you for not being as awesome human beings as they are.
 
Before I answer, let me ask you this:

You have no problem with a business owner (bakery owner, etc.) refusing to do business with anyone they don’t agree with based on politics, religion, sexual identify, race, etc. After all, they can just choose to go to a business where their money is appreciated, right?

So do you have a problem with a restaurant owner who allows his patrons to mock other customers whose political, religious, etc. stances they don’t agree with? After all, if they don’t like it, they can just choose to go to another business where their money and company is appreciated, right?



That makes absolutely no sense, moron.
People were not in their face screaming. The owner simply said I am not baking your cake. If the restaurant did not want to serve him then fine. He could leave.

But that was a lack of class and civility on the protestors part. It was also bordering on a physical attack.

I dont know how the restaurant managment felt. Maybe they let it go on or maybe it happened so fast it escalated before they could react. Either way not a good situation.

I would not approve of people screaming at a gay couple or anyone in that manner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thunderscope
So do you have a problem with a restaurant owner who allows his patrons to mock other customers whose political, religious, etc. stances they don’t agree with? After all, if they don’t like it, they can just choose to go to another business where their money and company is appreciated, right?

That looked like a somewhat nice restaurant, so I would imagine the cost to dine there isn't what most would consider cheap (keep in mind I'm using normal standards, not the rock star lifestyle you are accustomed to) so I would be insanely pissed if a bunch of idiots were disrupting my dinner, because they can't act grown up enough to voice their opinions outside. Have some respect for the patrons.
 
Bingo. I wonder what the distinction is. If it's ok to deny services to someone based on their race, religion, sexual orientation, or gender, what's the big deal if you discriminate against someone just based on different political opinions?

Hey, it's F.A.G., true to form. According to the left, it's not ok to deny services to anyone based on any metric.
 
I don’t think anyone has the right to do that in front of a mans family. Whether it’s on the right side or left side of politics. The problem with this country is people can’t have a different opinion without being offended and taking it to an extreme when that opinion is offered up. I’m ok with denying services as long as it’s done in a peaceful and tasteful manner. “So you’re a gay couple”? Sorry I don’t support that and I’m not going to bake your cake but good luck elsewhere and have a nice life.” That person has the right to do so as a business owner and those folks have a right to disagree. In Cruz’s case these people were in the wrong to walk into a private place and do that. I’d take less offense if it were on the street and would not see an issue with that as it’s their right to peaceful protest.
 
That looked like a somewhat nice restaurant, so I would imagine the cost to dine there isn't what most would consider cheap (keep in mind I'm using normal standards, not the rock star lifestyle you are accustomed to) so I would be insanely pissed if a bunch of idiots were disrupting my dinner, because they can't act grown up enough to voice their opinions outside. Have some respect for the patrons.


I hope he is harassed until he gets completely out of politics. It's a tough business and he has deserved every single bit of it.
 
I hope he is harassed until he gets completely out of politics. It's a tough business and he has deserved every single bit of it.

So let's say this happened at a nice restaurant one evening and it's a group whom you do not know harassing someone you don't care about one way or the other, wouldn't you still be pissed off at the fact that these idiots were ruining your evening by causing this commotion? I don't care if they want to do it outside, but that's nonsense to disrupt everyone else's life because they don't agree with someone's politics.
 
Those folks were yelling things that could easily be considered threatening.

At a time when members of Congress (on both sides) are literally being shot in public, maybe politicians riling up and encouraging supporters to harass officials isn't the smartest policy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT