I have lied, but I'm not a liar.
Anybody catch that?
Reminded me of extragreen.
Anybody catch that?
Reminded me of extragreen.
I have lied, but I'm not a liar.
Anybody catch that?
Reminded me of extragreen.
I have no idea, without knowing which particular questions he lied about during the first testimony. Do you know them? I honestly don't. I do know that all of these hearings have become a farce in recent years, and it's basically a bunch of rednecks choosing sides, digging in deep, and arguing for 10-12 hours per session. It's kind of like a extragreen-iamherdman thread, with herdman being the logical one.Logically, if he lied the last time before Congress about the exact same questions, he is probably telling the truth this time; a lot of this stuff is just no verses yes. That's why the GOP line of attack was illogical. But we know logic is not important in these things.
a lot of this stuff is just no verses yes.
I have no idea, without knowing which particular questions he lied about during the first testimony. Do you know them? I honestly don't. I do know that all of these hearings have become a farce in recent years, and it's basically a bunch of rednecks choosing sides, digging in deep, and arguing for 10-12 hours per session. It's kind of like a extragreen-iamherdman thread, with herdman being the logical one.
Except when you are able to produce a signed check with a date on it...dated August 2017...after he became POTUS.
Except when you are able to produce a signed check with a date on it...dated August 2017...after he became POTUS.
Was the notation on it "hush money to mistress from campaign funds"? 'Cause if it was, I'd say you got something.
I'm surprised a bigger deal isn't being made about his answers to the Prague questions.
https://amp.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article208870264.html
Michigan's Justin Amash
much to lose if he were caught in a lie at this hearing.
Cohen absolutely lied to Congress when asked about wanting a job within the whitehouse. Is it a big deal in the grand scheme of things no but he had no reason to lie. Everything he said should be taken with a grain of salt.Watched/listened to the nearly the entire thing.
- Couldn't believe Wasserman-Schultz is still in office let alone on this committee. A liar and a cheat asking questions to a liar and a cheat about a liar and a cheat.
- The republicans were in full rage and BS mode. It's truly the party of Trump. Only Michigan's Justin Awash wasn't playing this childish "liar, liar pants on Fire" schtick. He asked some of the best questions of the hearing.
Cohen was believable - He had absolutely nothing to gain from lying - and much to lose if he were caught in a lie at this hearing.
- Actually, the republicans were selective in believing statements by Cohen. They believee the "no pee pee tape"...and "No -Trump didn't smack Melania" statments were true. But everything else was BS.
"Trump finally went to Vietnam, and he's getting killed back home."
"Congressman Jordan has his head so far up Trump's ass it's a wonder his hair plugs were plucked out."
If he wasn't in Prague, then it's a yuge blow to the Steele dossier.That this story was also proven false?
In his statement, he said he discussed with the WH legal team, and it was decided he couldn't become part of the staff.....it wouldn't work. This one could be difficult to disprove. Again, he had nothing to gain and everything to lose by lying. He lies - more time in the pokey.Cohen absolutely lies to Congaree when asked about wanting a job within the whitehouse. Is it a big deal in the grand scheme of things no but he had no reason to lie. Everything he said should be taken with a grain of salt.
One of the statements the republicans decided was true.....again - they behaved like a group of stooges yesterday.If he wasn't in Prague, then it's a yuge blow to the Steele dossier.
I believe the quote was Trump didn't expect to win. That doesn't necessarily mean he didn't want to win. Considering the time and energy he put in the last few weeks of the campaign - seemed to be quite a bit of "want to" to me.Cohen: “Trump didn’t even want to win the election”
So why was it necessary to collude with Russia?
Seriously. When we are left with late night (nobody watches) talk show host clips, attempting to make sense of this for guys like Chevy....welllll....it’s pretty safe to say...Dems bombed this one.
Amash is my representative. 3rd distict of M is mostly Grand Rapids, and then a bunch of us redneck counties along I-94. Most of Kalamazoo is represented by Kate Upton's Uncle. Back to Amash, most of us still aren't sure what the fvck he is. He may have trouble getting re-elected if he doesn't start toeing the Trump line.He's not a Trumper nor a Bagger. He's pretty libertarian. Not surprised.
Why was collusion necessary?
This speaks to a larger point. I think having him there at all is ridiculous. Both sides are picking & choosing what to believe from a guy with a documented history of lying to the exact same group.One of the statements the republicans decided was true.....again - they behaved like a group of stooges yesterday.
Was the notation on it "hush money to mistress from campaign funds"? 'Cause if it was, I'd say you got something.
I have lied, but I'm not a liar.
Anybody catch that?
Reminded me of extragreen.
Only republicans were picking and choosing which statements to believe.This speaks to a larger point. I think having him there at all is ridiculous. Both sides are picking & choosing what to believe from a guy with a documented history of lying to the exact same group.
If Cohen wasn't in Prague, then it's a pretty huge admission. And frankly, the republicans have never come out & said those things about Trump. He's not some Trojan horse.Only republicans were picking and choosing which statements to believe.
It's been pointed out none of the republicans really came to Trump's defense. You didn't hear statements like, "I refuse to believe our President would do this"....or...."President Trump is a fine human being with great character and undeniable integrity, and I believe our President when he tells me _____" No one said anything close to that. Sadly, and to their credit, republicans realized that was even less credible than their grade school proclamation of "Liar Liar Pants on Fire".
Considering his risk for lying, I agree with you as it concerns Prague.If Cohen wasn't in Prague, then it's a pretty huge admission. And frankly, the republicans have never come out & said those things about Trump. He's not some Trojan horse.
Yeah, you should represent him and use that as strategy. I'm sure it will go well.
To discredit her and her (presumed) presidency as much as possible.So why was it necessary to collude with Russia?
Weren't you disbarred or some sh*t?
To discredit her and her (presumed) presidency as much as possible.
Tell us more....
I'm not entirely sure. Some other posters have hinted at his identity, and he never responds to posts asking him about being in the bar. There have also been posts suggesting that he used to post under a different name years ago (and, no, I don't think he's Mako). I'm just assuming that where there's smoke . . .
Big Country has been anxiously waiting to meet him for months.