Crooked Hillary Finally Says Radical Islam

[i am herdman]

Credit to her. The worst president in history won't say it and now he is saying no clear link to ISIS. She probably wouldn't do anything about it but maybe she is at least coming to grips with it.

This guy is a danger to this country.

Oh and I think Hillary took in 22 million from the Saudis.

 

[extragreen]

2,605 U S citizens killed in one attack under Bush

Unnecessary bush war killing 4,222 American soldiers

Obama is dangerous.

 

[i am herdman]

2,605 U S citizens killed in one attack under Bush

Unnecessary bush war killing 4,222 American soldiers

Obama is dangerous.

So FDR gets the blame for WW2? Pearl Harbor and all?

Anyway, that stupid just like your comment.

Obama is the President and has been for 8 years. He is basically incompetent and won't deal with it on his watch. That will be his legacy. Letting world wide terrorism grow and hit the home land. And, not doing a damn thing about it. He refuses to address evil.

 

[extragreen]

So FDR gets the blame for WW2? Pearl Harbor and all?

Anyway, that stupid just like your comment.

Obama is the President and has been for 8 years. He is basically incompetent and won't deal with it on his watch. That will be his legacy. Letting world wide terrorism grow and hit the home land. And, not doing a damn thing about it. He refuses to address evil.

Did FDR START the war?

 

[Rock98Dog]

Did Bush? I swear, you have absolutely no logical thought process banging around in that cranium of yours.

The Japs started the war against the U.S. The terrorist started the war when they started dive bombing passenger planes into various U.S. Targets. So if you want to blame Bush for the 4,000 killed plus those in the WTC, you have to blame FDR for the 400,000 U.S. Soldiers killed in WWII, 300,000 of which were in Europe even though we were never attacked anywhere but the Pacific and FDR, the war hawk that he was, decided to fight wars on different sides of the planet at the same time.

 

[Herd Fever]

Lol you guys are hilarious.

Keep believing the BS the mainstream media feeds you. I guess you believe this is the worst mass shooting in US History too.

 

[dherd]

Did Bush? I swear, you have absolutely no logical thought process banging around in that cranium of yours.

The Japs started the war against the U.S. The terrorist started the war when they started dive bombing passenger planes into various U.S. Targets. So if you want to blame Bush for the 4,000 killed plus those in the WTC, you have to blame FDR for the 400,000 U.S. Soldiers killed in WWII, 300,000 of which were in Europe even though we were never attacked anywhere but the Pacific and FDR, the war hawk that he was, decided to fight wars on different sides of the planet at the same time.

I AM SURE HE WAS REFERRING TO BUSH LYING US INTO IRAQ.
SPEAKING OF WHATS BANKING AROUND IN CRANIUMS - IT IS
OBVIOUS YOUR USERNAME IS PERFECT FOR YOU - ROCKS.

 

[andy4theherd]

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/

just like Obama changed the definition of "unemployed" to make his "out of work" statistics shine you Libs changed definition of "WMD's" so that ones previously made or sold to Iraq by the US didn't count... despite the fact they were there... and available for use... by the bad guys...

 

[extragreen]

Did Bush? I swear, you have absolutely no logical thought process banging around in that cranium of yours.

The Japs started the war against the U.S. The terrorist started the war when they started dive bombing passenger planes into various U.S. Targets. So if you want to blame Bush for the 4,000 killed plus those in the WTC, you have to blame FDR for the 400,000 U.S. Soldiers killed in WWII, 300,000 of which were in Europe even though we were never attacked anywhere but the Pacific and FDR, the war hawk that he was, decided to fight wars on different sides of the planet at the same time.

That's correct. FDR did not start the war against Japan. Pearl Harbor, Dec 7.
FDR did not start the war against the axis. Germany declared war against the U S on Dec 11th. The U S declared war against Germany afterward.
So, no, I do NOT have to blame FDR for those deaths.
But, as a matter of FACT, bush DID start the iraq war, preemptively.

That logical thought of yours.....was merely a figment of your imagination.

 

[extragreen]

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/

just like Obama changed the definition of "unemployed" to make his "out of work" statistics shine you Libs changed definition of "WMD's" so that ones previously made or sold to Iraq by the US didn't count... despite the fact they were there... and available for use... by the bad guys...

We want to hear more about obama changing the definition of "unemployed".

From the New York Times article .............."The United States government says the abandoned weapons no longer pose a threat." .........."Participants in the chemical weapons discoveries said the United States suppressed knowledge of finds for multiple reasons, including that the government bristled at further acknowledgment it had been wrong."..........."Nonetheless, several participants said the United States lost track of chemical weapons that its troops found, left large caches unsecured, and did not warn people — Iraqis and foreign troops alike — as it hastily exploded chemical ordnance in the open air."........."“And all of this was (chemical munitions) from the pre-1991 era.”

 

[i am herdman]

Did FDR START the war?

Yes. He was cutting off Japan's shipping lanes and their oil flow. The USA was cutting Japan off. So, yes. There is also evidence that he knew the Imperial Navy was moving closer to Hawaii and the Philippines. Did nothing about it. How the hell do you not know a whole Navy and Army army are moving towards two major us operations? Damn that FDR.

Do you see how stupid that is? But, following todays libtard logic that is what they would come up with.

 

[GeauxHerd]

2,605 U S citizens killed in one attack under Bush

Unnecessary bush war killing 4,222 American soldiers

Obama is dangerous.

Unnecessary Kennedy/Johnson war kills 58,000k Americans in South East Asia.

 

[i am herdman]

Unnecessary Kennedy/Johnson war kills 58,000k Americans in South East Asia.

LMAO. Johnson made that thing a mess for sure.

 

[extragreen]

Unnecessary Kennedy/Johnson war kills 58,000k Americans in South East Asia.

Eisenhower got us involved in that conflict.

 

[i am herdman]

Eisenhower got us involved in that conflict.

Ugggh who escalated and the Gulf of Tonken? LBJ

GOnna win those hearts and minds. The sad thing is they still teach that horse shi* to the military.

 

[GeauxHerd]

Eisenhower got us involved in that conflict.

With Advisers (which just about every president has done that). Who sent in the first combat troops?

 

[extragreen]

With Advisers (which just about every president has done that). Who sent in the first combat troops?

Military advisors are soldiers

 

[extragreen]

With Advisers (which just about every president has done that). Who sent in the first combat troops?

Who got us involved?

 

[extragreen]

Ugggh who escalated and the Gulf of Tonken? LBJ

GOnna win those hearts and minds. The sad thing is they still teach that horse shi* to the military.

Are you disagreeing with the military? Again?

 

[Rock98Dog]

That's correct. FDR did not start the war against Japan. Pearl Harbor, Dec 7.
FDR did not start the war against the axis. Germany declared war against the U S on Dec 11th. The U S declared war against Germany afterward.
So, no, I do NOT have to blame FDR for those deaths.
But, as a matter of FACT, bush DID start the iraq war, preemptively.

That logical thought of yours.....was merely a figment of your imagination.

Bush did not start the war with the terrorist, they declared war on us on September 11, 2001. How you consider a war that started after 9/11 as preemptive defies all explanation. If you want to get technical, the war was actually declared while Clinton was President, with attacks such as the one on the US Cole, but Clinton, like Obama, was too much of a puss to declare war back. At least FDR knew you had to stand up (literally) when threatened.

 

[extragreen]

Bush did not start the war with the terrorist, they declared war on us on September 11, 2001. How you consider a war that started after 9/11 as preemptive defies all explanation. If you want to get technical, the war was actually declared while Clinton was President, with attacks such as the one on the US Cole, but Clinton, like Obama, was too much of a puss to declare war back. At least FDR knew you had to stand up (literally) when threatened.

I stated clearly the war on Iraq, not the war on terror. Why you cannot comprehend the English language defies all explanation.

 

[GeauxHerd]

Who got us involved?

Truman

 

[extragreen]

Truman

Did he send any military? If your going to include giving money to France, then I'm going to blame Bush's grandfather for getting us involved in ww2.

 

[GeauxHerd]

Did he send any military? If your going to include giving money to France, then I'm going to blame Bush's grandfather for getting us involved in ww2.

yes. The US military delivered military aid to Vietnam, which meant that forces were "In Theater" at that time.

 

[Rock98Dog]

I stated clearly the war on Iraq, not the war on terror. Why you cannot comprehend the English language defies all explanation.

The war in Iraq was an extension of the war on terror. When you are fighting a group without a country, you have to pick a country to go fight them in and Iraq sure seems like a better choice than here. What you won't ever admit is the strategy worked. Terrorist attacks on western soil all but ended during the Iraq war as those "freedom fighters" rushed to Iraq for the opportunity to shoot at American soldiers. It is tragic that we lost 4,000 soldiers, but how many terrorist, both present and future, ended up rotting in the sand over there from being on the wrong end of a US serviceman's weapon?

 

[GeauxHerd]

The war in Iraq was an extension of the war on terror. When you are fighting a group without a country, you have to pick a country to go fight them in and Iraq sure seems like a better choice than here. What you won't ever admit is the strategy worked. Terrorist attacks on western soil all but ended during the Iraq war as those "freedom fighters" rushed to Iraq for the opportunity to shoot at American soldiers. It is tragic that we lost 4,000 soldiers, but how many terrorist, both present and future, ended up rotting in the sand over there from being on the wrong end of a US serviceman's weapon?

Green prefers it to be here. It fits the agenda better.

 

[i am herdman]

The war in Iraq was an extension of the war on terror. When you are fighting a group without a country, you have to pick a country to go fight them in and Iraq sure seems like a better choice than here. What you won't ever admit is the strategy worked. Terrorist attacks on western soil all but ended during the Iraq war as those "freedom fighters" rushed to Iraq for the opportunity to shoot at American soldiers. It is tragic that we lost 4,000 soldiers, but how many terrorist, both present and future, ended up rotting in the sand over there from being on the wrong end of a US serviceman's weapon?

I have said for years this is why went to Iraq.

We needed a place to fight them.