My favorite part of the article? They keep referencing "experts" when discussing the negative aspects of spinners, while citing only one - some guy from UCF (without giving his credentials). What's even better is the fact that the guy hasn't even performed any studies supporting his opinion, as evidenced by his use of the phrase "I imagine . . . ."
Hey. Here's an idea. Instead of imagining what these toys do, do some actual research before spouting off about sh*t you know nothing about.
How does garbage like this "article" get published by a major outlet like Time? And, frankly, I'm shocked as hell that someone as intelligent as GK would cite this.