ADVERTISEMENT

Flynn's Phone Was Wire Tapped

i am herdman

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Mar 5, 2006
88,988
35,047
113
That is a fact.

The information was leaked during the Obama admin. Fact. It had to be leaked. A Washington newspaper was given info.

Leaking that information is a felony.

Who ordered the wire tap of Flynn and the Russian Ambassador?

Somebody(ies) head should should be on a platter.

At least one felony was committed with info leaked to the Washington Post.

Perhaps other illegal wiretaps were ordered.

There is no doubting there were wire taps. That really can't be denied. Leaking that info is a felony. Were the wire taps even legal?
 
If Flynn doesn't realize that a russian ambassador will have his calls monitored, the more reason for him to be gone.
 
That is a fact.

The information was leaked during the Obama admin. Fact. It had to be leaked. A Washington newspaper was given info.

Leaking that information is a felony.

Who ordered the wire tap of Flynn and the Russian Ambassador?

Somebody(ies) head should should be on a platter.

At least one felony was committed with info leaked to the Washington Post.

Perhaps other illegal wiretaps were ordered.

There is no doubting there were wire taps. That really can't be denied. Leaking that info is a felony. Were the wire taps even legal?
Almost as leaky as the trump White House and Spicers crew.
 
Leaking that info is s a felony

Then let's prosecute a thousand people over the last few administrations.

If a leak does not harm national security and is done to spotlight bullshit, I am all for it. That's where Snowden crossed the line, he dumped too much and harmed national security. Leaking that someone is a lying prick isn't a big deal.
 
Wire tapping a Russian official is one thing. Identifying the American citizen is illegal.
 
Yes it is, but it is a "necessary evil", so to speak. Flynn was not morally competent for the position, and exposed as such. The leak served its purpose.
Illegal is illegal and I am guessing(and probably correct) that there were other things going on and people are leaking shit all over the place with ties to the former administration.
 
If a leak does not harm national security and is done to spotlight bullshit, I am all for it. That's where Snowden crossed the line, he dumped too much and harmed national security. Leaking that someone is a lying prick isn't a big deal.

Mostly agree, but if a leak exposes technology or tactics that's an aspect of national security too. It's a fine line.
 
Are people forgetting the leaks under Obama were so bad they went full Joe-Pesci on leakers & whistleblowers?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT