Ford Will Not Seek Any Further Investigation
- Thread starter wvkeeper(HN)
- Start date
funny thing about crying for an FBI investigation is it uncovers lots of lies
Without those who can remember the incident - there's no reason to move forward. I don't know why any reasonable person would pursue the kind of notoriety she's endured since this thing erupted.
If you choose to believe the polls, the majority of American's bought her story.....not Brett's.
If you choose to believe the polls, the majority of American's bought her story.....not Brett's.
Republicans don’t care if their nominee is unpopular
The American public believes Christine Blasey Ford more than they believe Brett Kavanaugh. An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll found that 45 percent of Americans thought she was the one telling the truth at last week’s Senate hearing, while 33 percent thought Kavanaugh was. It was a notable shift from the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings, when 58 percent of Americans said they believed Thomas more and only 24 percent said Hill.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...me-court-senate-confirmation-republicans-yolo
The American public believes Christine Blasey Ford more than they believe Brett Kavanaugh. An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll found that 45 percent of Americans thought she was the one telling the truth at last week’s Senate hearing, while 33 percent thought Kavanaugh was. It was a notable shift from the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings, when 58 percent of Americans said they believed Thomas more and only 24 percent said Hill.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...me-court-senate-confirmation-republicans-yolo
She did what she sought out to do. Thankfully, the majority saw through this bullsh*t and did what needed to be done.
Did she "seek" the incident to be made public? Everything I've heard from republican senators is she didn't want it to be made public. She would have preferred this to be run as an internal investigation without outing her publicly....and they're trying to find the "leak".
She hired an attorney before being made public. She had polygraph before being made public. She took several steps including having her FBI friend attempt to sway Dr Fords supposed witness’s to say they did remember the party, when actually they said they didn’t even know Kavanaugh. She lied about not liking to fly when records show her flying everywhere even to Delaware where she stayed with FBI buddy. Same FBI buddy that pressured fake witnesses and same agent that people are saying actually wrote Dr Fords letter. Now Dr Ford has a Milliion dollar go fund me page and is a darling of the left. She’ll lay low until someone comes up with more $’s to get her story.
In what way did the FBI agent "pressure" the witnesses? Did they hold a gun to their head? Threaten financial ruin? Kidnap their children?
I'm guessing this "pressure" was saying something like, "Are you sure you don't remember?"
Anyway, the result doesn't indicate the "pressure" was too stiff.
I'm guessing this "pressure" was saying something like, "Are you sure you don't remember?"
Anyway, the result doesn't indicate the "pressure" was too stiff.
Is it really a stretch that someone would retain legal counsel before being questioned by the FBI? Or take a polygraph to strengthen their accusation? Or, can someone who admits to not liking to fly...still fly? Airport bars are full of those folks.
I've already addressed the "pressure" exacted by the FBI. What was the nature of this "pressure"?
This is an example of right-wing talking points. Sure makes a dandy soundbyte.... lacks common sense....but that's never stopped Russian bots from spewing nonsense.
Last edited:
Chevy, when someone calls you and says they are with the FBI and suggest you consider changing your statement is pressure. No gun no threat of kidnapping etc, needed.
Dr Ford hired attorney and took polygraph well before being outed well before she knew (supposedly) that she was going to be interviewed not after. Your common sense should be wondering why do all this when you believed you were going to be anonymous.
Dr Ford hired attorney and took polygraph well before being outed well before she knew (supposedly) that she was going to be interviewed not after. Your common sense should be wondering why do all this when you believed you were going to be anonymous.
If she is as intelligent as many of you claim, she would know the likelihood of her story going public was tremendously high.
Stop playing naive and pretending to believe everything as long as it fits the liberal narrative.
Did they recommend they change their testimony? If so, what did they try to have them change it to? Just asking. Again, what was the "pressure" applied? No one appeared to be too intimidated.
She expected to be interviewed for sure. I'm sure, since she was making an allegation, she needed to show it wasn't some crazy thing she dreamed up. The Lie Detector is "proof" her statement has some credibility. It would be interesting to see if Justice Kavanaugh would pass a lie detector test. Other than the fact he likes beer, he didn't impress me much.
I don't believe she wanted to testify in front of the Senate on live television. If fact, she didn't want her name released. That's what I gather listening to republican senators. Now, it's not too far-fetched to believe they're a bunch of lying, sycophantic assholes who would do anything and everything to support the party, but I'm taking them at their word on this nonetheless.
Last edited:
What the republican senators are so wound up about was this wasn't raised during the investigation period where it would have been handled as a classified, internal review. Guess they're a bunch of dumb shits too.
“The Wall Street Journal reported that Leland Keyser — a "lifelong friend" named by Christine Blasey Ford as having been at the party where Brett Kavanaugh's alleged assault of Ford took place — says she was pressured by Ford's allies to change her sworn statement to authorities to benefit Ford.
As reported by The Daily Wire Wednesday, the Journal provided what could potentially have serious legal ramifications for Ford ally and former FBI agent Monica McLean for possibly attempting to "tamper" with a witness:
Leland Keyser told investigators that Ford's friend, former FBI agent Monica McLean, had urged her to alter the original statement that she gave about not remembering any such party and not knowing Kavanaugh, The Wall Street Journal reported.”
As reported by The Daily Wire Wednesday, the Journal provided what could potentially have serious legal ramifications for Ford ally and former FBI agent Monica McLean for possibly attempting to "tamper" with a witness:
Leland Keyser told investigators that Ford's friend, former FBI agent Monica McLean, had urged her to alter the original statement that she gave about not remembering any such party and not knowing Kavanaugh, The Wall Street Journal reported.”
Her lie detector test made no reference to Brett Kavanaugh. At every turn she’s missing key pieces of the story.
“On Wednesday, the actual details from that polygraph were released to the public — and they make her already-flimsy story seem downright unbelievable.
The biggest problem with the so-called “lie detector” results are that the examiner never actually asked questions about Kavanaugh during the polygraph test.”
The biggest problem with the so-called “lie detector” results are that the examiner never actually asked questions about Kavanaugh during the polygraph test.”
Her lawyers didn’t even bring up the possibility of the senate staffers coming to her instead of her testifying in front of the committee. So please try to Explain that
NPR? Really? How about I show you the study conducted by the “Old, Retired Men Who Eat at Tudor’s Every Morning” poll, which shows that 95% of respondents believed Kavanaugh is innocent and thought Ford was actually Garth from “Wayne’s World?”
Senate republicans state her lawyers made those plans and Ford wasn't aware she could have been interviewed in CA....in private. I'm sure your sources have better info.
Bitch...Bitch...bitch. NPR is a strong source - they publish their methodology, and it's sound. You have a better one..... Bring it.
Chevy how bad was the pain when you realized Kavanaugh was going to be confirmed? Compare that to the pain you felt when you heard Trump won? Hope you saw SNL last night. The guy playing Cocaine Mitch done a good job being Mitch. Funny Stuff
I stated I was opposed to Kavanaugh's nomination? Perhaps you can refresh my memory.
Here are the lie detector questions. You're correct...the operator didn't mention his name. They asked her if her statement was true which mentioned Kavanaugh.
Got to admit, the test was pretty "skinny".
https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/n...augh/465-c1d634a3-2018-4a8a-86c7-013c9894b0d8
So says Fox News. But seriously, what part of the methodology didn't you find acceptable?
