I do notHonest question. Aside from the obvious (loss of life, family in mourning,etc), do we as Americans care?
I don't but, the media will lap this up. They will run with it.Honest question. Aside from the obvious (loss of life, family in mourning,etc), do we as Americans care?
I do. She was one of the last vestiges of class and grace in the disgusting world of international politics. Sad to lose that.Honest question. Aside from the obvious (loss of life, family in mourning,etc), do we as Americans care?
It’s interesting as a historical mile marker. Her first PM was Winston Churchill, who was born in 1874. She was the most famous royal figure in the western world for the entire life of the vast majority of people alive today. One of the last bridges between historical eras just fell.Honest question. Aside from the obvious (loss of life, family in mourning,etc), do we as Americans care?
Yes, she might’ve just hung on to see Borris out, hahaDidn't she just meet this week with the outgoing PM and the new PM? Like just a day or so ago?
Oh give it a few months, then her wastral grandson can be KingShe was the last standard of Western civilization as it was understood from 1000 AD to present has died with her.
Now her wastral son is King.
God help us.
I thought they were Windsor's not Wastrals.Oh give it a few months, then her wastral grandson can be King
Honest question. Aside from the obvious (loss of life, family in mourning,etc), do we as Americans care?
I always preferred vagabond.Now her wastral son is King.
There is no way that one boy is Prince Charles's son.I always preferred vagabond.
He sure is a prime example of the red headed stepchild.There is no way that one boy is Prince Charles's son.
She killed her daughter in lawI do. She was one of the last vestiges of class and grace in the disgusting world of international politics. Sad to lose that.
No wonder you don’t post as much as you once did. You’re working overtime at “The National Enquirer.”She killed her daughter in law
It’s not the craziest conspiracy theory supported on this site.No wonder you don’t post as much as you once did. You’re working overtime at “The National Enquirer.”
I'm amazed you still managed to fap to the pics in this video, knowing she was worm food.this is probly more fitting for the queen
. . . maybe not, but was the first thing i thought of when hearing of the queen's passing.
I will likely watch the coronation of Charles, whenever it may be. Why? Because there hasn't been one in our lifetimes.Honest question. Aside from the obvious (loss of life, family in mourning,etc), do we as Americans care?
Charles served in the military as well. I'll give the Brits credit, their royals do serve.I believe she was the last remaining head of state to have served in the military.
But there’ll likely be 2I will likely watch the coronation of Charles, whenever it may be. Why? Because there hasn't been one in our lifetimes.
Depends on how you look it. Ceremonial or a real head of state.I will likely watch the coronation of Charles, whenever it may be. Why? Because there hasn't been one in our lifetimes.
Charles served in the military as well. I'll give the Brits credit, their royals do serve.
I look at it like this: we do not know if a young man or woman will be President, but the Brits know someone will be monarch and they still serve. That is a fine tradition worth noting.Depends on how you look it.
If Charles lives as long as his mum, I may not make it to #2.But there’ll likely be 2
I doubt ole sausage fingers is pushing 90. 80 might be a stretch.If Charles lives as long as his mum, I may not make it to #2.
I read where the Royal Family is worth an estimated 28 billion dollars. Half the time they seem miserable.I doubt ole sausage fingers is pushing 90. 80 might be a stretch.
I will likely watch the coronation of Charles, whenever it may be. Why? Because there hasn't been one in our lifetimes.