ADVERTISEMENT

Happy Father's Day

Good for them for being seemingly a two parent loving household.

However I take exception with the terminology ...”assigned a female gender at birth.” He was born with a vagina and ovaries and XX chromosome. There’s no haphazard “assigning” here. It’s science he was born a she.

I’m fine with transitioning and maybe I’m sensitive to the verbiage here, but “assigned” seems like someone other than her chromosomes picked the gender at birth.
 
Good for them for being seemingly a two parent loving household.

However I take exception with the terminology ...”assigned a female gender at birth.” He was born with a vagina and ovaries and XX chromosome. There’s no haphazard “assigning” here. It’s science he was born a she.

I’m fine with transitioning and maybe I’m sensitive to the verbiage here, but “assigned” seems like someone other than her chromosomes picked the gender at birth.

When it comes down to it, does your god not assign what he wants to be what? He’s in charge of the science behind it.
 
Since it’s science, countryroads (he’s such a disgrace to that name) should agree with you, Carl. After all, he thinks that anything one can label “science” you should believe...regardless of the topic.
 
When it comes down to it, does your god not assign what he wants to be what? He’s in charge of the science behind it.

I’m honestly not sure what you’re asking here. I’m not being snarky - rephrase so I can answer or understand.

Whether there is a God or not I think even atheist thought leaders like Sam Harris would agree with my take on gender here.

I just didn’t like the word “assigned.” It seemed like a human was assigning it rather than a random mixture of sperm/egg (Darwin, etc) or a God. It just made it sound like a medical mix up or something.

Again, I’m fine with him switching, but that’s up to him.

I might be overly sensitive to this as I’ve been listening to a lot of Eric Weinstein, Joe Rogan, Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson recently (lots of discussions about biological gender differences).
 
Since it’s science, countryroads (he’s such a disgrace to that name) should agree with you, Carl. After all, he thinks that anything one can label “science” you should believe...regardless of the topic.


Nobody is debating the science of it, moron. What is being argued is the use of the word “assign.” Frankly, I don’t know how you theists could have a problem with that. Your god clearly assigned that person to be a male or female.
 
I’m honestly not sure what you’re asking here. I’m not being snarky - rephrase so I can answer or understand.

Whether there is a God or not I think even atheist thought leaders like Sam Harris would agree with my take on gender here.

I just didn’t like the word “assigned.” It seemed like a human was assigning it rather than a random mixture of sperm/egg (Darwin, etc) or a God. It just made it sound like a medical mix up or something.

Again, I’m fine with him switching, but that’s up to him.

I might be overly sensitive to this as I’ve been listening to a lot of Eric Weinstein, Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson recently (lots of discussions about biological gender differences).

I’m asking, did your god not ultimately assign a sex to that person? The sex of a baby isn’t something controlled by free-choice. It’s in your god’s hands what sex he wants to assign to that baby, so “assign” seems extreme accurate . . . at least to a theist it should.
 
I’m asking, did your god not ultimately assign a sex to that person? The sex of a baby isn’t something controlled by free-choice. It’s in your god’s hands what sex he wants to assign to that baby, so “assign” seems extreme accurate . . . at least to a theist it should.

I gotcha. I agree.

Like I said, I’m probably overly sensitive here due to extreme podcast overload on gender stuff.

I guess if I was the author I would have said “he was born a female” (but identifies now as male) and not said “assigned a female gender “...
 
I gotcha. I agree.

Like I said, I’m probably overly sensitive here due to extreme podcast overload on gender stuff.

I guess if I was the author I would have said “he was born a female” (but identifies now as male) and not said “assigned a female gender “...

But just to be clear, in your eyes, he was assigned a sex by your god, correct?
 
But just to be clear, in your eyes, he was assigned a sex by your god, correct?

I’m not sure. I *think* so but I’m a doubt filled believer. Does God intervene in all matters or just some? Is there a God?

I struggle with God and suffering in this world .

I tend more toward an Armenianism point of view ( sorry Keep).
 
As an aside there is a fantastic interview with Sam Harris and one of the Worlds experts in early Christian Church ( Bart Erhman).

Erhman seems to believe Jesus existed but can’t reconcile human suffering with a just God.
 
Nobody is debating the science of it, moron. What is being argued is the use of the word “assign.” Frankly, I don’t know how you theists could have a problem with that. Your god clearly assigned that person to be a male or female.


Yeah, God does assign the gender. It's then up to someone with two eyes and a functioning brain (usually a doctor or nurse) to confirm that. It's only liberals like you who take issue with it.
 
Yeah, God does assign the gender. It's then up to someone with two eyes and a functioning brain (usually a doctor or nurse) to confirm that. It's only liberals like you who take issue with it.

So, you have no problem with the statement that Carl disputes. Maybe you guys should have fellowship some evening and discuss it.

How about all of those assignments your god fvcks up when people are born with plumbing for both sexes? I bet those are just tests he is giving us, huh?

Brainwashed, bigoted, hillbillies.
 
Physiological? Most young kids don’t understand how babies are created, moron. Do you remember sucking on your mom’s tits? Exactly.

This child has a far greater chance of being “normal” and having success than you ever had.
That kid will be ****ed up. Guarantee it. Future Democrat.
 
How is mutilation a sex crime?

Oh, so it’s just general mutilation of one’s body that you want to make illegal? In that case, start an online petition to gain support making circumcision, ear piercings, nose piercings, nipple piercings, belly button piercings, and tattoos illegal. All of those can easily be argued to be body mutilation.

On the petition, be sure to leave the comment area open so that I can read all of the comments calling you a moron so that I don’t have to keep typing it.
 
Oh, so it’s just general mutilation of one’s body that you want to make illegal? In that case, start an online petition to gain support making circumcision, ear piercings, nose piercings, nipple piercings, belly button piercings, and tattoos illegal. All of those can easily be argued to be body mutilation.

On the petition, be sure to leave the comment area open so that I can read all of the comments calling you a moron so that I don’t have to keep typing it.
There's a major difference between mutilation (complete removal/destruction of body parts) and piercings and tattoos.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT