Herdman: Trump cares about veterans?

[Marine03]

This article seems to suggest otherwise.

https://shareblue.com/trump-veterans-bill-va-mission-act-funding/

 

[i am herdman]

This article seems to suggest otherwise.

https://shareblue.com/trump-veterans-bill-va-mission-act-funding/

How so?

 

[Marine03]

How so?

Did you read the fvcking article?

 

[raleighherdfan]

asking for the bill to be funded with other budgetary changes/cuts is working against veterans?

 

[i am herdman]

Did you read the fvcking article?

Well, it wasn't much of an article. More of a biased hit piece.

Looks like it was slamming trump for not making certain things mandatory.

 

[WV-FAN]

asking for the bill to be funded with other budgetary changes/cuts is working against veterans?

pretty much this. however, you know libs are going to spin into him working against vets. ho-hum, what's new . . .

 

[dherd]

 

[HerdFan76]

The DoE has been tasked with auditing the VA and presenting their findings and recommendations to Congress. This is a huge process and we're only in the beginning phases.

 

[i am herdman]

The DoE has been tasked to audit the VA and present their findings and recommendations to Congress. This is a huge process and we're only in the beginning phases.

Probably needs to be done.

 

[raleighherdfan]

Well, it wasn't much of an article. More of a biased hit piece.

Looks like it was slamming trump for not making certain things mandatory.

I'm not sure Marine actually took the time to read the linked statement by the White House on "mandatory" items either. The first part of the statement appears to remove some congressional red tape in order for certain funding of the law (programs) to be freed up more quickly, in the case spending exceeds the current caps.

 

[i am herdman]

I'm not sure Marine actually took the time to read the linked statement by the White House on "mandatory" items either. The first part of the statement appears to remove some congressional red tape in order for certain funding of the law (programs) to be freed up more quickly, in the case spending exceeds the current caps.

Marine tried to have a gotcha moment and acted on emotion. It happens.

 

[Dreh_Nagi_HC_IM]

Moving to New York and then to Connecticut has softened the Marine into a liberal tub of Margarine.

 

[dherd]

one thing we can be sure of, the national anthem, and standing in front of a group of military personal while
cutting va befits certainly is far from emotional - that's why it always works on herdman. or does it really?

 

[Marine03]

This is the second portion of the article that none of you mental midgets could figure out how to tap the hyperlink to get to. Interesting Herdman that the Military Times (a credible veteran news source) clearly explains it in their headline.

https://www.militarytimes.com/veter...of-new-va-reform-law-hours-after-praising-it/

 

[i am herdman]

one thing we can be sure of, the national anthem, and standing in front of a group of military personal while
cutting va befits certainly is far from emotional - that's why it always works on herdman. or does it really?

what cuts?

 

[i am herdman]

This is the second portion of the article that none of you mental midgets could figure out how to tap the hyperlink to get to. Interesting Herdman that the Military Times (a credible veteran news source) clearly explains it in their headline.

https://www.militarytimes.com/veter...of-new-va-reform-law-hours-after-praising-it/

Like you asked me, did you even read the article?

 

[Marine03]

Like you asked me, did you even read the article?

Of course I did. However I’m convinced Trump could murder a room full of people. Get caught on camera with knife in hand and you Trump zombies would still deny the fact he did it. It’s amazing how some of you refuse to see any wrong doing the man does.

 

[raleighherdfan]

Of course I did. However I’m convinced Trump could murder a room full of people. Get caught on camera with knife in hand and you Trump zombies would still deny the fact he did it. It’s amazing how some of you refuse to see any wrong doing the man does.

Hyperbole is all you have. No way you actually read it beyond the headlines. And this article relies on mental midgets not reading beyond the headlines.
You linked us to yet another article that was already explained by actually reading the statements the white house sent to congress. The administration "eliminated" mandatory (red tape) items that make it easier for the Sec of VA to fund certain aspects of program if it exceeds preset limits on funding.

Section 152(a) of the Act, would add a provision, 38 U.S.C. 1703E(g)(2)(B)(iii), that purports to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (the “Secretary”) to obtain the approval of the chairmen of two congressional committees before expending more than $50 million of appropriated funds in a fiscal year on certain pilot programs. Under the separation of powers, the Congress may not make the approval of members of Congress a precondition to the execution of the law. Accordingly, I direct the Secretary to treat section 1703E(g)(2)(B)(iii) as advisory and non-binding while still heeding section 1703E(g)(2)(B)(ii), which requires the Secretary to notify the congressional committees before exceeding the spending cap.

Please tell us how this isn't for the benefit veterans?

 

[Marine03]

Hyperbole is all you have. No way you actually read it beyond the headlines. And this article relies on mental midgets not reading beyond the headlines.
You linked us to yet another article that was already explained by actually reading the statements the white house sent to congress. The administration "eliminated" mandatory (red tape) items that make it easier for the Sec of VA to fund certain aspects of program if it exceeds preset limits on funding.

Section 152(a) of the Act, would add a provision, 38 U.S.C. 1703E(g)(2)(B)(iii), that purports to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (the “Secretary”) to obtain the approval of the chairmen of two congressional committees before expending more than $50 million of appropriated funds in a fiscal year on certain pilot programs. Under the separation of powers, the Congress may not make the approval of members of Congress a precondition to the execution of the law. Accordingly, I direct the Secretary to treat section 1703E(g)(2)(B)(iii) as advisory and non-binding while still heeding section 1703E(g)(2)(B)(ii), which requires the Secretary to notify the congressional committees before exceeding the spending cap.

Please tell us how this isn't for the benefit veterans?

Clueless, simple minded, blind follower of all things Trump. Of course it’s not surprising all things considered.

 

[WV-FAN]

Clueless, simple minded, blind follower of all things Trump. Of course it’s not surprising all things considered.

so, you can't answer the question. could have just said so.

 

[Dreh_Nagi_HC_IM]

so, you can't answer the question. could have just said so.

Most Marines don't suffer from 'butt-hurt'.