ADVERTISEMENT

hey trumpsters where's all news from wiki thats gonna blow up clintons campaign -played for suckers

dherd

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 23, 2007
11,203
556
113
ALL THESE GULLIBLE LITTLE TRUMPSTERS SET THEIR ALARMS
FOR 4 A.M. THIS MORNING WAITING BREATHLESSLY FOR THE BIG NEWS.
PLAYED AGAIN - THEY JUST NEVER LEARN - THEY SWALLOW THE HOOK
EVERY SINGLE TIME. EVEN FISH LEARN NOT TO BITE THE HOOK, BUT
NOT THESE IDIOTS.

LONDON — The expectations were breathless.

For weeks, backers of Republican nominee Donald Trump hyped the tantalizing possibility that the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks was on the verge of publishing a set of documents that would doom Hillary Clinton’s chances in November.

“@HillaryClinton is done,” longtime Trump associate Roger Stone tweeted Saturday. “#Wikileaks.”

The announcement by WikiLeaks that it would host a major news conference Tuesday only seemed to confirm that the bombshell was ready to burst. The pro-Trump, anti-Clinton media world rippled with fevered speculation.


But if an October surprise about the Democratic nominee really is coming, it will have to wait a little longer.

Over the course of two hours on Tuesday — with the world’s media and bleary-eyed Trump die-hards across the United States tuning in — Assange and other WikiLeaks officials railed against “neo-McCarthyist hysteria,” blasted the mainstream media, appealed for donations and plugged their books (“40 percent off!”).

[Trump may like these remarks made by Putin about the U.S.]

But what they didn’t do was provide any new information about Clinton — or about anything else, really.
 
14484767_262683324131549_7208394151179981430_n_1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeauxHerd

JUST ANOTHER DAY AT A TRUMP RALLY.

DID YOU BOYS STAY UP ALL NIGHT TWEETING
WITH THE DONALD AND WAITING FOR THE BIG
WIKI NEWS. MAYBE TOMORROW OR MAYBE YOU
SHOULD TRY TO GET SOME SLEEP.

 
Last edited:
Nah, she just verbally abuses those that work for her some a typically elitist bitch who believes anyone who actually works is beneath her. She'll also have no problem killing people remotely with drones and special ops forces or having her goons take someone out, but she doesn't pull the trigger herself.
 
Nah, she just verbally abuses those that work for her some a typically elitist bitch who believes anyone who actually works is beneath her. She'll also have no problem killing people remotely with drones and special ops forces or having her goons take someone out, but she doesn't pull the trigger herself.

Oh yes she does. The best assassin you've ever seen. After killing as many people as her and bill have, it's got to be done personally.
 
Oh yes she does. The best assassin you've ever seen. After killing as many people as her and bill have, it's got to be done personally.

good point eg - whats that billary body count at now
60 or 70?
billarry are real pros.
all those conservatives have been trying to pin
a rap on them for 30 years and not so much as
a jaywalking ticket. makes you wonder are billary
just plain honest or are all those cons just that incompetent.
 
A president killing someone personally is not unprecedented. Frank Underwood did push Zoe Barnes in front of the subway train, so...
 
  • Like
Reactions: andy4theherd
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT