ADVERTISEMENT

Hollywood makes another video pleading for congress to "obstruct and defeat Trump"

andy4theherd

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Sep 1, 2007
15,652
3,018
113
at some point a few of you Libs are gonna have to explain to these clowns that if they keep this up the next 10 preisdents will be Republican...

 
  • Like
Reactions: 30Kelly and 19MU88
Capture.png
 
After 8 years of obstruction by the cons, you now want the dems to play along with you cheetos fans?
 
Didn't they learn this shit doesn't work? As if a bunch of limpwristed millionaires finger wagging from their gated communities convinced suckers to get out the vote for Hillary.

This acting for social justice causes with their crinkled brows only works on libtards who are already entranced and hypnotized by watching their entertainment media shit.
 
pretty sure there were a couple of Obama SCOTUS confirmations. #moron

You really are a moron. Those 2 confirmations were made with about 10 of 41 conservatards voting for confirmation in the first and about 4 conservatards voting for confirmation in the second while refusing to allow a vote for the third appointee. That's a total of about 14 conservatard votes out of a possible 136. Appreciate the help, moron.
 
It's just another example of the lack of self awareness of liberals.
 
It's almost as if Trump didn't advocate for the LGBT community at the Republican convention. It's almost as if he hasn't advocated for the American worker over American businesses during his entire campaign. It's almost as if Trump hasn't vowed to help the inner cities more than any presidential candidate in history. It's almost as if they actually believe those 'acts of violence' they mentioned were real and not made up like they were proven to be.

I mean seriously...what is wrong with these people? Trump's platform is job creation and stopping illegal immigration. I would love to know where all this other stuff comes from.
 
Bravo!!! Well done Hollyweird! I, for one, am all for celebs, athletes, and the MSM continuing with these types of campaigns/overreactions.

Will make it easier to keep libs out of office for the foreseeable future.
 
You really are a moron. Those 2 confirmations were made with about 10 of 41 conservatards voting for confirmation in the first and about 4 conservatards voting for confirmation in the second while refusing to allow a vote for the third appointee. That's a total of about 14 conservatard votes out of a possible 136. Appreciate the help, moron.
They were just following the Biden rule
 
They were just following the Biden rule

So help your fellow conservatard out. How many total conservatard votes for the 3 Obama supreme Court appointees?

While you're at it, how many consevatard votes for the affordable Care act?

How many consevatard votes for the stimulus?

Providing you have your fingers and toes, that will probably be sufficient for conservatards to count the total for all the above.
 
Yeah, not voting yea is in fact obstructing, moron.
I didn't think it was possible, but you are a bigger MORON than I ever considered. no wonder you learned yourself a trade so you could make shitty cabinets rather than use your brain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30Kelly
I didn't think it was possible, but you are a bigger MORON than I ever considered. no wonder you learned yourself a trade so you could make shitty cabinets rather than use your brain.

How much did you pay for your college education? It was WAY too much.

As political strategy
Obstructionism can also take the form of widespread agreement to oppose policies from the other side of a political debate or dispute.

Here, since morons like you can't find a dictionary, I'll show you what they have to say......

Websters (that's the name of the company that provides dictionaries)


  • Definition of obstruct
  1. transitive verb
  2. 1: to block or close up by an obstacle
2: to hinder from passage, action, or operation : impede

And just so you'll know, "block" doesn't always mean completely

Websters (in case you missed it the first time or can't remember, that's the name of the company that provides dictionaries )

Definition of block
  1. transitive verb
1a : to make unsuitable for passage or progress by obstructionb archaic : blockadec : to hinder the passage, progress, or accomplishment of by or as if by interposing an obstruction

c: to hinder the passage, progress, or accomplishment of by or as if by interposing an obstruction
e : to interfere usually legitimately with (as an opponent) in various games or sports f : to prevent normal functioning or action of

Since you probably can't understand the above, here's a link to a learners dictionary: http://learnersdictionary.com/
It's for people like you who have a hard time understanding the meaning of words.

Oh, and just in case you think Websters is a liberal source, I thought I'd include one from Oxford (another company that provides dictionaries)

1Block (an opening, path, road, etc.); be or get in the way of:

‘she was obstructing the entrance’

  1. 1.1 Prevent or hinder (movement or someone or something in motion):
    ‘they had to alter the course of the stream and obstruct the natural flow of the water’
1.2 Deliberately make (something) difficult:
‘fears that the regime would obstruct the distribution of food

As political strategy
Obstructionism can also take the form of widespread agreement to oppose policies from the other side of a political debate or dispute.
 
what an idiot.....if he can't see the difference between how the process is supposed to work (voting to confirm or not) vs delaying or not even taking up the vote as obstruction he is a bigger moron than any of us ever imagined. he googles for dictionary definitions. #fool

I would have thought he was familiar with the concept as the left has accused the right of obstructing Obama's selection this past year.....despite the fact no President has been able to nominate and have confirmed a SC judge during the last year of their term for about 80 years or so.
 
Donald Trump was certified the winner of the 2016 election today. Vice President Joe Biden, in his role as President of the Senate, presided over a joint session of congress to certify the vote. Rather than acknowledge the clear results of the election, something Democrats thought was very important before Trump won, Democrats took the opportunity to raise a series of objections. From NPR:

More than half a dozen members rose at different points to object to the results of the election, citing Russian hacking, the legitimacy of the election and electors, voting machines, voter suppression and more.

As each Democrat rose to object to the certification of the vote, Biden stated the requirements, i.e. an objection must be in writing and must be signed by both a member of the house and a senator. The objections were all in writing but none had been signed by a senator, so Biden repeatedly cut the Democrats off with a bang of his gavel. CNN reports Biden told Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, “There is no debate. There is no debate. There is no debate.”

Finally, when Rep. Pramila Jayapal rose to object to the certification of the vote in Georgia, Biden briskly cut her off with his gavel. “There is no debate,” he said. Biden then repeated the requirements for an objection to the certification and asked, “Is the objection in writing and not only signed by the member but by a United States Senator?” Rep. Jayapal replied, “Mr. President even as people waited hours…” Biden slammed the gavel and again repeated, “There is no debate.” Biden added, “If it is not signed by a senator the objection can not be entertained.” This time Rep. Jayapal said, “Mr. President the objection is signed by a member of the House but not yet by a member of the Senate.”

“It is over,” Biden replied. The quip brought a laugh from House Speaker Paul Ryan and a standing ovation from Republicans in the chamber.

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/01/06/biden-cuts-off-democratic-objections-to-trumps-win-it-is-over/
 
The only point I would make is the statement "the majority of Americans. This is true across the 50 states. However if you remove just 1 state (CA where all these people in the video make their lives and most reside). The total vote changes to the majority of Americans voted for Trump. So my thought is what makes CA think their 1 state over the other 49 is most important. Would trump have won if the it was popular vote instead of the way it is now? I don't know, but I bet he would have campained a whole lot different and CA, NY and a couple other states would have had closer totals in the votes.

In a political campain you look at the rules of that voting process and do what you think you need to do to win. which is what Trump did. Get over it he won by the rules we have used for decades. If you don't like the existing rules do what you can to change them.
 
LOL, has been pretty faces for TV pretending to have thoughts and beliefs. And demanding that we adopt the same ones.

Sally Field and the guy who had Billy Madison on his kill list and marked it out with lipstick before putting another coating of it on his lips?

Yeah, you're not respected for your minds. Next.
 
what an idiot.....if he can't see the difference between how the process is supposed to work (voting to confirm or not) vs delaying or not even taking up the vote as obstruction he is a bigger moron than any of us ever imagined. he googles for dictionary definitions. #fool

I would have thought he was familiar with the concept as the left has accused the right of obstructing Obama's selection this past year.....despite the fact no President has been able to nominate and have confirmed a SC judge during the last year of their term for about 80 years or so.

1. You're a moron's moron.
2. The chance for an "lame duck" president to make a Supreme Court nomination in his last year in office has only happened once in the past century, in 1968.
3. Only a moron like you wouldn't accept definitions from a dictionary (the book designed to give the meanings of words)
 
1. You're a moron's moron.
2. The chance for an "lame duck" president to make a Supreme Court nomination in his last year in office has only happened once in the past century, in 1968.
3. Only a moron like you wouldn't accept definitions from a dictionary (the book designed to give the meanings of words)
With regards to #3 you certainly ignore the definition of religion when it comes to scientology
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
1. You're a moron's moron.
2. The chance for an "lame duck" president to make a Supreme Court nomination in his last year in office has only happened once in the past century, in 1968.
3. Only a moron like you wouldn't accept definitions from a dictionary (the book designed to give the meanings of words)
LOL

you are mad and stupid. that's no way to go through life cabinet boy
 
LOL

you are mad and stupid. that's no way to go through life cabinet boy

I'm neither, but you're a liar or senile, or both. I'm still waiting for that list you "said" you had that I didn't or wouldn't respond to.
 
I used to think Greed was just another ignorant sheep. While that assessment is true, he's also an asshole, and quite possibly the most stubborn moron in human history.
 
I used to think Greed was just another ignorant sheep. While that assessment is true, he's also an asshole, and quite possibly the most stubborn moron in human history.

Yep, I stick with the truth, whether you like it or not.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT