How Dumb Can He Be?

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Before watching this video from yesterday, remember how cheeto describes himself:

"I'm, like, really smart."
"I'm a very stable genius."

Now, watch him show his mastery of 8th grade social studies/geography:



It's embarrassing. How does the president of the United States not know basic geography of one of our closest allies?

 

[murox]

Before watching this video from yesterday, remember how cheeto describes himself:

"I'm, like, really smart."
"I'm a very stable genius."

Now, watch him show his mastery of 8th grade social studies/geography:

View embedded media

It's embarrassing. How does the president of the United States not know basic geography of one of our closest allies?

I'll take that all day compared to "John P. Democrat (The P is for "poor") deserves the fruits of your labor more than you do because he votes for me. Also, there are 700 genders and bureaucrats should run the nation's healthcare industry."

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

I'll take that all day compared to "John P. Democrat (The P is for "poor") deserves the fruits of your labor more than you do because he votes for me. Also, there are 700 genders and bureaucrats should run the nation's healthcare industry."

Oh, the "you're a Socialist" argument is back!

The fact that you have to fabricate a quote to try and make an argument is indicative enough about its merit. But elaborate on your comment:

You make an assumption that the only reason Democrats support the poor and programs to help them is to earn votes. I'm not a politician; I don't give a shit about earning votes. So why am I fine with welfare programs being available? Why does the Democratic voting base care about those programs even though they aren't politicians trying to earn votes?

What socialist programs supported by Democratic leaders are you against the cheeto has discontinued? Now, I have to ask this because you flip-flop on your political decisions more than BC does on his own religious beliefs . . . you've previously held the position that you want all welfare programs cut. You claimed that there are enough charities and religions groups that can and will help anyone truly in need, so you want all welfare programs stopped. Do you still back that or have you flipped? Either way, tell us what welfare programs that Democratic leaders support have been stopped by cheeto that you are in support of having been stopped.

 

[murox]

You make an assumption that the only reason Democrats support the poor and programs to help them is to earn votes. I'm not a politician; I don't give a shit about earning votes. So why am I fine with welfare programs being available?

The same reason any other person would vote for democrats. Not all necessarily apply to you, but democrats typically fit into one or more of the classifications below:

1. You know calling for higher taxes on the "rich" will not result in higher taxes on yourself. You either don't make enough, or maybe you run a mostly cash business and hide many of your earnings from the IRS.
2. You are a homosexual and believe Republicans are out to take your rights from you.
3. You're an illegal immigrant living in the US and know democrats are counting on your vote.
4. You're a social justice warrior.
5. You have so much money (mostly in wealth, not income) that you don't care about taxes, it won't affect you at all.

Oh sh!t, I forgot. You're a democrat because you're an altruist. The only living human who puts the desires of complete strangers over his own.

Remember when you used to post pictures of your sexual conquests on herd nation for internet points and refer to them as "slvts"? Then remember when you feigned outrage at Trump for fvcking a porn star and joined the "me too" movement? Yeah.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Oh sh!t, I forgot. You're a democrat because you're an altruist. The only living human who puts the desires of complete strangers over his own.
.

Let me get this straight: you mock the thought that there are a lot of people out there who will put the needs of others, reasonably, in front of their own. Yet you support doing away with all welfare programs because you claim there are enough people out there who will put the needs of others, reasonably, in front of their own.

I can understand why your political stances flip-flop. They just aren't well-thought out enough to be able to defend them over time and stay consistent with your positions. Flip-flop, flip-flop.

Remember when you used to post pictures of your sexual conquests on herd nation for internet points and refer to them as "slvts"? Then remember when you feigned outrage at Trump for fvcking a porn star and joined the "me too" movement? Yeah.

Remember when you didn't have to fabricate things to make a reasonable point?

I wasn't outraged - truthfully or as an act - that cheeto fvcked a porn star. I called him out for publicly boasting about cheating on multiple wives and boasting about sexually assaulting women.

I'll even make a new thread for you to try and find a link that doesn't exist between my actions vs. my comments about cheeto.

 

[big_country90]

I wasn't outraged - truthfully or as an act - that cheeto fvcked a porn star. I called him out for publicly boasting about cheating on multiple wives and boasting about sexually assaulting women.

Yeah murox. And Harvey also obtained written consent from every girl he posted near naked photos of online before he did his boasting. They were 100% aware of his actions and gave their total consent.

 

[WVUSerg]

 

[i am herdman]

Let me get this straight: you mock the thought that there are a lot of people out there who will put the needs of others, reasonably, in front of their own. Yet you support doing away with all welfare programs because you claim there are enough people out there who will put the needs of others, reasonably, in front of their own.

I can understand why your political stances flip-flop. They just aren't well-thought out enough to be able to defend them over time and stay consistent with your positions. Flip-flop, flip-flop.




Remember when you didn't have to fabricate things to make a reasonable point?

I wasn't outraged - truthfully or as an act - that cheeto fvcked a porn star. I called him out for publicly boasting about cheating on multiple wives and boasting about sexually assaulting women.

I'll even make a new thread for you to try and find a link that doesn't exist between my actions vs. my comments about cheeto.

Next thing you know Trump will be bragging about the number of head jobs he got in high school.

 

[19MU88]

Next thing you know Trump will be bragging about the number of head jobs he got in high school.

Well If Trump does that I hope he does the classy thing and creates multiple screen names and makes his boasts on a message board

 

[19MU88]

I see where you were going Herdman my bad for over doing where you already were on this. This is funny because I saw this post before the BJ post, but boasting about conquests reminded me of him even without seeing the high school BJ post

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Yeah murox. And Harvey also obtained written consent from every girl he posted near naked photos of online before he did his boasting. They were 100% aware of his actions and gave their total consent.

They don't have to give their "total consent." None of the girls would have a problem, assuming they weren't naked (which they weren't in the pictures), with it.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

I see where you were going Herdman my bad for over doing where you already were on this. This is funny because I saw this post before the BJ post, but boasting about conquests reminded me of him even without seeing the high school BJ post

They still won't engage with you. Take a hint.

 

[big_country90]

They don't have to give their "total consent." None of the girls would have a problem, assuming they weren't naked (which they weren't in the pictures), with it.

Yeah right. You'd better come up with a better defense than that. And I suppose they're also all ok with being called a slvt and having the entire internet know you had sex with them?

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Yeah right. You'd better come up with a better defense than that. And I supposed they're also all ok with being called a slvt and having the entire internet know you had sex with them?

I'm not sure Pullman gets "the entire internet" reading it each day. If so, I am going back to negotiate higher pay from the board owner for me posting on here.

Let me see if I can try to determine your point: I am allegedly a hypocrite for speaking out against sexual assault and women's rights because I refer to some slvts as "slvts" and I have shown pictures of girls who aren't naked?

You'll have to explain that link.

 

[sistersville]

Next thing you know Trump will be bragging about the number of head jobs he got in high school.

Lol that sounds like rifle. Rifle is more like trump than anybody on here. Born with a golden spoon and daddy's back pocket. Both brag on anything. Bragging on one's grammar actually is too low for trump. Lol. I am jealous of them both. They need money they just run to the ATM and big daddy has the cash a waitin

 

[big_country90]

I'm not sure Pullman gets "the entire internet" reading it each day. If so, I am going back to negotiate higher pay from the board owner for me posting on here.

Let me see if I can try to determine your point: I am allegedly a hypocrite for speaking out against sexual assault and women's rights because I refer to some slvts as "slvts" and I have shown pictures of girls who aren't naked?

You'll have to explain that link.

You're a hypocrite because of your history of posting nearly naked photos, or in some cases naked photos with their private parts blacked out, of girls, without their knowledge or consent, for other guys to see just to brag and have people think you're cool. And you do this while saying how much of a slvt they are, and that you have just had sex with them or received a blowjob from them. Never mind the fact that you also post pics of girls and claim that they may or may not have an STD.

Now, I firmly believe that every girl you have ever had sex with has been 100% consensual. I'm not suggesting otherwise. But I think you also betray the trust of a lot of those girls by posting pics and bragging about your conquests and not keeping them anonymous. You don't think there is at least some correlation and hypocrisy involved in that? I guarantee you none of those girls would have given their consent for you to do that had you asked their permission ahead of time.

You're the poster child for what the "Me Too" movement stands against. But because you consider yourself a leftist you don't think there is anything wrong with what you're doing. It would be extremely difficult to find something more hypocritical than that.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

consentual.

What the fvck does that even mean? Do you mean "consensual"? Do you have a lisp or something?

Work on your basic spelling. Then, greatly improve the logic behind your arguments. Then, I will come back and respond to why your accusation of hypocrisy based on the "me, too" movement makes absolutely no sense.

 

[big_country90]

What the fvck does that even mean? Do you mean "consensual"? Do you have a lisp or something?

Work on your basic spelling. Then, greatly improve the logic behind your arguments. Then, I will come back and respond to why your accusation of hypocrisy based on the "me, too" movement makes absolutely no sense.

Yeah...hide behind a spelling error. My finger slipped. That should get me off the hook.

Now...how about you address your hypocrisy.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Yeah...hide behind a spelling error. My finger slipped. That should get me off the hook.

Now...how about you address your hypocrisy.

I keep saying that I am not going to waste time explaining to you why your arguments lack even the smallest amount of logic, but I continue doing that. I have way too many of your fellow morons to make fun of on this board to spend time continuing to educate you. But here we go . . .

The Me, Too movement's purpose was to empower women, give the victims support, and to call attention to sexual abuse and sexual harassment, particularly in the workplace.

Your claim is that my posting of non-nude pictures of anonymous girls to this board, which they consented to me taking, somehow is sexual assault, sexual harassment, or something strongly related to the Me, Too movement. It's not; not even a little bit.

Your claim that it "would be extremely difficult to find something more hypocritical than that" makes no sense.

Explain to us how supporting the Me, Too movement - a movement whose purpose is to empower victims and call out those accused of sexual assault and harassment - is anything even remotely similar to posting non-nude pictures that girls allowed me to take.

You can't, because there isn't even a remotely close link.

 

[19MU88]

Waste time? You have more time to kill on here than anyone? Write another novel playboy

 

[big_country90]

I keep saying that I am not going to waste time explaining to you why your arguments lack even the smallest amount of logic, but I continue doing that. I have way too many of your fellow morons to make fun of on this board to spend time continuing to educate you. But here we go . . .

The Me, Too movement's purpose was to empower women, give the victims support, and to call attention to sexual abuse and sexual harassment, particularly in the workplace.

Your claim is that my posting of non-nude pictures of anonymous girls to this board, which they consented to me taking, somehow is sexual assault, sexual harassment, or something strongly related to the Me, Too movement. It's not; not even a little bit.

Your claim that it "would be extremely difficult to find something more hypocritical than that" makes no sense.

Explain to us how supporting the Me, Too movement - a movement whose purpose is to empower victims and call out those accused of sexual assault and harassment - is anything even remotely similar to posting non-nude pictures that girls allowed me to take.

You can't, because there isn't even a remotely close link.

It’s really easy. How many of those girls would feel violated if they knew that nude or nearly nude photos of them were being put on a message board, without their consent, all so that nice guy they just had sex with could boast about adding to his numbers?

The fact that you can’t see the correlation is troubling. But go ahead and try to answer the question.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

It’s really easy. How many of those girls would feel violated if they knew that nude or nearly nude photos of them were being put on a message board, without their consent, all so that nice guy they just had sex with could boast about adding to his numbers?

The fact that you can’t see the correlation is troubling. But go ahead and try to answer the question.

How many women feel violated when their partner cheats on them? How many women feel violated when they are called a "bitch" if they give somebody attitude for no reason? Neither of those things have anything to do with the Me, Too movement.

None of the pictures showed any more skin than the girls post on social media in bikinis. Your repeated "nude" and "nearly nude" references ring hollow, unless you consider bikinis as "nude" or "nearly nude."

There is absolutely no correlation between what you're accusing me of doing and the Me, Too movement.

You should try changing your argument, because it doesn't link with that movement at all.

 

[big_country90]

Ok Harvey Riflestein. Don't think you'll have too many backers on this one.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

You've had plenty of opportunities to explain how they are the same thing, but you've failed miserably. I'll tell you what - I am running to do some shopping and then get dinner. I'll give you another chance if you can type it by the time I get back.

 

[big_country90]

The sad thing is that you're pretending not to see the correlation because of the light it will paint you in. That's ok. I would be ashamed too.

Let's pretend that two girls found out about your internet shenanigans and are discussing it with one another.

Girl # 1: "I feel so violated. He posted a picture of me, without my knowledge or consent, wearing nothing but a thong."

Girl # 2: "Me too."

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

You have a fundamental misunderstanding about what the Me, Too movement is about.

It's not about a girl feeling violated or getting her feelings hurt. It's not about a guy using a girl for sex. It's not about a girl feeling remorse for decisions she made by her own consent.

The things mentioned: cheating, being called a "bitch," having non-nude pics that you consented to being taken of you posted as an anonymous girl, having a guy tell people about what you were like in bed, about a guy lying to a girl to get her in bed, about a guy being a jerk, etc. is not part of the movement.

There is no correlation. I am not pretending anything. You are just making horrible arguments to defend an even more horrible position.

 

[big_country90]

And you're too dumb to realize that bringing up the Me Too Movement is just a way to make fun of you for pretending to be a champion for women everywhere when the reality is you treat them like trash.