Kamala choose to have a speaker at her Michigan rally who is currently involved in a very public sexual harassment lawsuit with three female employees. Their lawsuit claims they were forced into performing sex acts while on a business trip.
Interesting Choice To Have Speak
- Thread starter SamSwimmer
- Start date
Let's make sure we are all well aware of the fox in sheep's clothing, otherwise known as SpermSwimmer.
He runs around claiming he is an independent, doesn't lean either way, and is impartial. Yet he only ever bashes Dems and defends deplorables. This is a prime example:
Earlier, I posted about Antonio Brown speaking at a trump rally. Why is it bad to have Brown speak at a presidential candidate's really? Well, where do we start?
1) Burglary arrest
2) Criminal mischief arrest
3) Two accusations from different women of sexual assault
4) Lied to his employer about his medical status resulting in a suspension
5) Battery arrest against a woman in a domestic violence incident
6) Accused of selling a counterfeit watch
7) Arrested for failure to pay child support
8) Kicked off of Snapchat for posting a video of a woman giving him oral sex
9) Accusation of exposing himself to a woman at a Dubai hotel
10) Accusation of rape by his trainer
11) Found liable for destruction of property after throwing furniture out a 14th floor window and barely missing a 22 month old child
12) Sent explicit videos to his son, a youth, that reportedly involved the kid's mother.
13) Too many workplace issues to list: quitting and leaving the field in the middle, suspensions, Facebook Live while in the locker room after a game, etc.
So with all of those arrests, ethics issues, and batshit crazy behavior, SpermSwimmer doesn't say a thing about the guy being allowed to speak at a presidential candidate's rally. He does, however, have an issue with a singer speaking who:
1) Has been accused of fat shaming one of her dancers (18 witnesses claim it didn't happen, and Lizzo weighs about 400 lbs.)
2) Has been accused of sexual harassment due to an evening in Amsterdam's Red Light District. While there, Lizzo allegedly urged her team to attend the night out with her. They went to a strip club where Lizzo urged some of her team to engage with the dancers/entertainers where Lizzo allegedly urged one of them to touch a dancer's breast and urged them to take part in one of the shows by grabbing a banana out of a performer's vag.
Now, tell us, SpermSwimmer: as independent and non-leaning as you claim you are, why would you not say anything about somebody like AB speaking yet have enough of an issue with Lizzo that you'd make a post about it?
He runs around claiming he is an independent, doesn't lean either way, and is impartial. Yet he only ever bashes Dems and defends deplorables. This is a prime example:
Earlier, I posted about Antonio Brown speaking at a trump rally. Why is it bad to have Brown speak at a presidential candidate's really? Well, where do we start?
1) Burglary arrest
2) Criminal mischief arrest
3) Two accusations from different women of sexual assault
4) Lied to his employer about his medical status resulting in a suspension
5) Battery arrest against a woman in a domestic violence incident
6) Accused of selling a counterfeit watch
7) Arrested for failure to pay child support
8) Kicked off of Snapchat for posting a video of a woman giving him oral sex
9) Accusation of exposing himself to a woman at a Dubai hotel
10) Accusation of rape by his trainer
11) Found liable for destruction of property after throwing furniture out a 14th floor window and barely missing a 22 month old child
12) Sent explicit videos to his son, a youth, that reportedly involved the kid's mother.
13) Too many workplace issues to list: quitting and leaving the field in the middle, suspensions, Facebook Live while in the locker room after a game, etc.
So with all of those arrests, ethics issues, and batshit crazy behavior, SpermSwimmer doesn't say a thing about the guy being allowed to speak at a presidential candidate's rally. He does, however, have an issue with a singer speaking who:
1) Has been accused of fat shaming one of her dancers (18 witnesses claim it didn't happen, and Lizzo weighs about 400 lbs.)
2) Has been accused of sexual harassment due to an evening in Amsterdam's Red Light District. While there, Lizzo allegedly urged her team to attend the night out with her. They went to a strip club where Lizzo urged some of her team to engage with the dancers/entertainers where Lizzo allegedly urged one of them to touch a dancer's breast and urged them to take part in one of the shows by grabbing a banana out of a performer's vag.
Now, tell us, SpermSwimmer: as independent and non-leaning as you claim you are, why would you not say anything about somebody like AB speaking yet have enough of an issue with Lizzo that you'd make a post about it?
Your obsession with me is bizarre. By the way, you voting for Kamala?
Oh, another poster who thinks that just because I call out their dishonesty and bullshit, I am somehow "obsessed" with them. It's cute, but it's old at this point.
Don't mistake me calling you (and others) out for dishonesty and bullshit as being obsessed.
I've been through this countless times on here. I don't vote. But I would be voting for anybody against trump.
Your earlier posts indicate your obsession with me. I've never had anyone on this board demand I think or act a certain way. That's female behavior.
I haven’t demanded you think a certain way. I’ve mocked you and exposed your dishonesty. My first post in this thread is another example.
We’re pulling for you to start recovering from your brain damage, rifle. Really, we are
You're a stupid lying "undecided" voter.
FOUND LIABLE FOR SEXUAL ABUSE, CHEATED WITH A PORN STAR, CONVICTED CRIMINAL
FELON
You cant refute what I said, so you resort to that.
No problem with AB. Major problem with Lizzo! Yep, no bias, undecided, and independent, huh?
I didn't even read the post you're demanding I comment on. My apologies to females, your behavior is actually worse.
Yet you sure found the Lizzo article and the smallest criticism possible of her yet miraculously avoided all of the coverage of AB speaking at trump's rally and the overwhelming reasons for criticizing his invite. Amazing how that seems to constantly happen with you, huh?
Awe, sorry buddy I'm not playing message board the way that doesn't trigger you.
You're back to female behavior, little buddy. Seriously, have you started your recovery yet? What you went through was serious & you shouldn't neglect brain damage. The board is pulling for you to start getting better.
You're repeating yourself.
Here, let me play:
Still no explanation for your lies, intellectual dishonesty, and cowardness.
I’m repeating myself because you’re acting like a female. I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t why, other than something neurological, you can’t understand that. I’m not required to follow some ratio of equal criticism. I resent both parties, but one far more than the other. Especially after calling out the entire Biden situation four years ago, on this very message board, & being told I’m just making shit up. Had Trump not ended Biden’s career in that debate, y’all would still be pushing that lie.
The way Kamala was appointed without a single primary win, the decision to pick Walz, tech & media protecting her, & her entire campaign set a precedent that I honestly can’t believe any democrat voters are okay with. I say that with zero irony. I honestly can’t. Y’all are the ones who got truly effed. And if you’re being honest, you know it too. Gaffigan was right.
And if Kamala wins, politics doesn’t move backwards. That’s just encouraging both sides in the next election to go harder in the paint because Kamala got away with it this time.
When I post something critical of the candidate you’ll be voting for, I post links to neutral or left leaning sites as much as possible just so lefties are forced to acknowledge it’s not just coming from the right. The left just provides far more bad policy to comment on
Yeah, clearly, just like in this thread where you posted a tweet from a far-right blogger.
At some point, you have to start being honest with yourself.
Kamala only addressed the Detroit crowd for six minutes?
She’s “exhausted.” It works for trump, and you have no problem when he claims that as a reason why he can’t show up. She actually shows up, yet you still blast her and not a word about trump doing even less.
Undecided, independent, non-biased . . . yep! You’re making this too easy for us.
Calm down, lady. All I asked was if Kamala only addressed the crowd for six minutes. Truly puzzled by that. Six minutes is minuscule considering how important Michigan is to her success. I'd get it if they're writing Michigan off as either a solid Trump victory OR a Kamala lock, but it's literally dead even at the moment.
It's actually an unbiased question because I think it's a mistake on her part & don't understand the strategy. Let's say in 2016 I asked, "Wait, Hillary's ignoring Wisconsin this late in the election?" - that's not bias, that's a legit question of questionable strategy.
Don't allow TDS to permeate every single action of your existence.
Why continue lying?
You very easily and quickly could get the answer to your “question.” But you posed it as a question to try taking a jab at Kamala.
I guess she could have played music for 30 minutes and awkwardly danced onstage l, at which point, you’d have no problem with it like you didn’t with trump. On the other hand, you have no problem with trump not even showing up for his scheduled events, let alone talking for six minutes.
Is it something neurological with you or are you & greed sharing your login? Honestly asking. Is this because we hurt your feelings over those yoga pants? I’m not voting for Trump. I haven’t exactly hidden that fact either.
It also doesn’t explain her giving such a short speech at a key rally. Which is a legit question. Trump - the candidate she’s running against spoke for ten, had mic issues for 15, & he spoke for longer once the issues got cleared up. To me, spending a sizable chunk of time in front of the crowd in MI makes sense. A six minute speech does not. The polls have the state dead even
Why don't you simply Google it to see how long the speech was by Harris in Michigan.
No surprise there.
trump at McDonald's: "1 cheeseburger for thee, 10 cheeseburgers for me!"
“I wouldn’t mind this job,” Trump said. “I like this job. I would come back and do it again.”
^^^Best idea he's ever had. But still under qualified, and wouldn't last a week.
I know you and your kind don’t know the difference and can’t define a woman, but that was female genitalia I was referring to with roast beef, dumb shit.
You stupid punk, you'd have a point if you hadn't mentioned Willy Brown. I doubt that Willy Brown has female genitalia. Dimwit.
Unless they have the printing presses stamping the ballots they need for Detroit.
