ADVERTISEMENT

Is NBC News a Reputable Enough Source?

big_country90

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 9, 2007
15,016
5,241
113
The mueller investigation is not limited to collusion. Sorry about that.
as we've witnessed. he's made however many indictments, none of which have had anything to do with one single american and the initial purpose of the investigation. funny how as we come to an end, liberal excitement has moved from "bu bu bu but RUSSIA" to "but errrrrrr uhhhh wasn't all about russia!"

you guys are like the gift that keeps on giving . . . herpes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
as we've witnessed. he's made however many indictments, none of which have had anything to do with one single american and the initial purpose of the investigation. funny how as we come to an end, liberal excitement has moved from "bu bu bu but RUSSIA" to "but errrrrrr uhhhh wasn't all about russia!"

you guys are like the gift that keeps on giving . . . herpes.

So if trump has done nothing wrong don’t worry about it and let him round up those that have broken the law. There nothing to worry about huh???
 
So if trump has done nothing wrong don’t worry about it and let him round up those that have broken the law. There nothing to worry about huh???
you should be answering that yourself. you liberal faggits are the ones going to go off the deep end when it's all over. nobody on the good guys side really gives a shit about the collateral damage. break the law, get caught, deal with it. idgaf. you, on the other hand, will be spouting, "well, what about so-n-so who got caught for this, and the other dude that got busted for that?!"

tenor.gif


mentally deranged liberal faggits, that's who.
 
Democratic Senate investigators who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity did not dispute Burr's characterizations, but said they lacked context.

"We were never going to find a contract signed in blood saying, 'Hey Vlad, we're going to collude,'" one Democratic aide said.

The series of contacts between Trump's associates, his campaign officials, his children and various Russians suggest a campaign willing to accept help from a foreign adversary, the Democrats say.

I'd say that's accurate.

Tell me, who said this:

“I want to use this forum to push back on some narratives that have sprung up around the subject. A lot of folks, including many in the media, have tried to reduce this entire conversation to one premise; foreign actors conducted a surgical, executed covert operation to help elect a United States president. I’m here to tell you this story does not simplify that easily.”
 
"My guy won so don't concern yourself with what he did or laws he broke to make it happen. I don't give a shit."
 
you should be answering that yourself. you liberal faggits are the ones going to go off the deep end when it's all over. nobody on the good guys side really gives a shit about the collateral damage. break the law, get caught, deal with it. idgaf. you, on the other hand, will be spouting, "well, what about so-n-so who got caught for this, and the other dude that got busted for that?!"

tenor.gif


mentally deranged liberal faggits, that's who.
Hey there, easy now hater. You sure sound like a guy who is a little worried.
 
but-hillarys-emails-6189694.png


I think all of you are fvcking tossers, and one day when the shit hits the fan I am going to laugh.
i don't recall anybody that mueller has indicted running for president, do you?
 
Last edited:
"My guy won so don't concern yourself with what he did or laws he broke to make it happen. I don't give a shit."
if he won then he broke no laws. what am i missing here other than yet another fabrication for mentally deranged libs to cry about?
 
i don't recall anybody that mueller has indicted running for president, do you?

I don't recall anyone at a certain address here in town being indicted for selling smack, but I damn well know that is what they are doing when cars come and go and people throw needles out of their car windows.*

Can or will you answer my question about that quote in my earlier post?

* Oddly enough, I am sure if someone were to burn that motherfvcka down the cops would suddenly be interested in doing their jobs.
 
So Trump could have shot some one in the middle of 5th Avenue, and, because he won, he wouldn't have broken any laws. Makes perfect sense.
Can’t be guilty of anything when you are doing such a good job in your own mind.
 
So Trump could have shot some one in the middle of 5th Avenue, and, because he won, he wouldn't have broken any laws. Makes perfect sense.
nobody said anything of the sort. and, no matter how many dumbass hypotheticals you come up with, they'll have one common trait as russian collusion . . . didn't happen.

i almost feel sorry for you mentally deranged libs. had your heart set on russian collusion and the rug has been yanked out from under you, and now all you got is a bunch of 'what if's'. pathetic.
 
I don't recall anyone at a certain address here in town being indicted for selling smack, but I damn well know that is what they are doing when cars come and go and people throw needles out of their car windows.*

Can or will you answer my question about that quote in my earlier post?

* Oddly enough, I am sure if someone were to burn that motherfvcka down the cops would suddenly be interested in doing their jobs.
the R leader of the investigation. can you tell me why i should give a flying fuhk when there were both R's and D's on the committee?

here's a question for you and other mentally deranged libs (that I know the answer to for most of mentally deranged libs): when it happens, will you accept mueller's report of no russian collusion between trump and the rooskies? hell, it's rhetorical: no damn way. you'll never believe there wasn't something there. never. and, before you idiots ask, as for me, if mueller comes out with definitive proof of that occurring, fvck trump, get rid of him. and, that's what will happen if he has the evidence: impeached. fine by me.
 
the R leader of the investigation. can you tell me why i should give a flying fuhk when there were both R's and D's on the committee?

here's a question for you and other mentally deranged libs (that I know the answer to for most of mentally deranged libs): when it happens, will you accept mueller's report of no russian collusion between trump and the rooskies? hell, it's rhetorical: no damn way. you'll never believe there wasn't something there. never. and, before you idiots ask, as for me, if mueller comes out with definitive proof of that occurring, fvck trump, get rid of him. and, that's what will happen if he has the evidence: impeached. fine by me.
What does any of this have to do with the Mueller investigation?
 
the R leader of the investigation.

Why is Burr even allowed to investigate a campaign he was a member of?

when it happens, will you accept mueller's report of no russian collusion between trump and the rooskies?

You are a smart guy, so I assume you mean direct evidence of Trump himself colluding with Ivan. Roger Stone admitted fvcking collusion, it's pretty clear Guccifer 2.0 is a Russian asset.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT