You sure seem to jump to a lot of conclusions and make a lot of assumptions based on limited information. You also make a lot of generalizations about large groups of people based on the opinions and actions of a subset. It's almost like you read what you want to read.
Hmmm... Sounds like I am just projecting your thoughts back to you...
Generalizations??? Isn't that the very definition of identity politics that the liberal arm of the Democrat party has been using to polarize our nation and the political process?
For example all Christians are narrow-minded, all whites are racist and only whites can be racist, business owners are greedy, men are sexist, Republicans are evil... I'm sure I missed some.
In my earlier post, I said that Machnin mentions extremism on both sides. I wholeheartedly agree with him. There are some nutjobs on the left but there are also nutjobs on the right.
Of course there are. But "some" nutjobs on the left??? Can you not somehow grasp what Manchin said? The nutjobs on the left have taken control of the Democrat party - virtually the entire party and its platform. And please list any of the policies promoted by the extreme left of the Democrat party that have had any positive results over the last few decades.
The majority of Democrats do not support transgender men in women's sports. That's statistically and categorically false. Yes, there are some that do, but not the majority. I do not support transgender men in sports. I think when we make choices in life, we also make sacrifices based on those choices. I have zero problem with transgender folks but I do believe a man, regardless of chosen sexuality, has an unfair advantage over women. So, if you choose to transition, I support you, but you give up competing in organized sports.
But the mainstream in the Democrat party, not the fringe, made it a national issue...
Its "centrist" current POTUS did so with one of his very first Executive Orders.
But yeah, keep saying the majority of Democrats don't agree with this but it is the cornerstone of several "Democrat" Executive Orders.
Btw aren't Executive Orders the opposite of the "democratic" process?
I don't give two sh*ts if a bill is 10 pages or 10,000. I care what's in that bill.
So which is easier to determine what's in a bill - 10,000 pages or 10? That's a really, really bad example to use to support your position.
While you want to be left alone, and while MAGA makes that claim, your actions demonstrate differently.
So now after making such bad arguments to support your positions you're somehow qualified to judge me???
Left alone - that's a generic figure of speech that you are taking literally. Nice play...
There have been many recent intrusive government mandates including the aforementioned transgender participation rules. How about a time-consuming and unnecessary small business mandate (Beneficial Ownership Interest reporting) that is clogging the federal court system? Stuff like that is likely contained in the 10,000 page "spending" bills you seemingly don't have a problem with...
www.foxnews.com
