ADVERTISEMENT

Kate Mara supports flag kneelers.

i am herdman

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Mar 5, 2006
89,171
35,193
113
Damn, I like her in We are Marshall.

Probably a spoiled bleeding heart liberal. Oh well. She likes flag kneelers.
 
What exactly is a flag kneeler? Do you mean Anthem kneeler? Last I’ve seen no one was actually kneeling on the flag idiot
 
As Beto said, there’s nothing more American than peacefully protesting injustices, especially to minorities in this country.

It’s a shame that some vets are too foolish to understand that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chevy1 and Marine03
President Trump refused to answer repeated questions about the late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
TPSGIUVKNMI6RCQMOC3BRSMNHQ.jpg
 
Its a shame they don't respect veterans. Besides the message is out. They are beating a dead horse. I'm all for protesting the police stations where the cops who shot people worked.
 
The joke is not taking their protest to the police stations where these cops who like to shoot black folks work. Have a protest that goes deeper than kneeling during the anthem at a football game. Get serious about seeing change not just ruining pro football
 
The joke is not taking their protest to the police stations where these cops who like to shoot black folks work. Have a protest that goes deeper than kneeling during the anthem at a football game. Get serious about seeing change not just ruining pro football
You don’t think that 99 out of 100 dead nfl players brains showing signs of CTE for killing football???
 
Last edited:
The joke is not taking their protest to the police stations where these cops who like to shoot black folks work. Have a protest that goes deeper than kneeling during the anthem at a football game. Get serious about seeing change not just ruining pro football
no, the joke is that they're protesting cops shooting blacks in the first place. it's a fvckin sham and a damn shame people are so fvcking stupid. if they want to protest something worthwhile, how about protesting black on black killings? how about they protest everybody follow the damn law to avoid getting shot? i get their protest, i just think they could protest something a bit more worthwhile . . . say, like mass killings? gasp, gun control?

hell, here's an idea: there are more whites killed by cops annually than blacks by greater than a 2:1 ratio. how about protesting cops killing whites?

i'll tell ya why . . . because liberalism is a god damn mental disorder and you motherfvckers protest the dumbest shit you can that will draw the most national attention. face it, what's more dramatic, cops killing a white man or black man? pretty easy answer, fwiw, iyam, imhnso.

instead of protesting this horseshit, how about you do what you'd rather be doing, anyhow: go burn an american flag or tear down a monument somewhere that's offended your candyass . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
if they want to protest something worthwhile, how about protesting black on black killings?
.

Let me dumb this down for you: the protests aren't about police killing police. They are about police killing (and assaulting and discriminating against) blacks and getting away with it.

Black violence against black violence is being prosecuted. Police violence against blacks is not being prosecuted. That is what the protest is about.


hell, here's an idea: there are more whites killed by cops annually than blacks by greater than a 2:1 ratio. how about protesting cops killing whites?

Oh, so you do know about ratios? Now, go look at the ratio in the population of whites and blacks to see why your argument is stupid.

Now, I will say this: there is a legitimate argument you deplorables can make to refute my last comment. However, I know that none of you read and study enough about these subjects to have the knowledge about it. I will help: it was a study done by a tenured Harvard professor (who is black) and a bunch of his research students.

But don't worry. I also looked in-depth at that study when it came out a couple of years ago, and I found many holes in it which calls a lot of its findings into question.
 
The left loves it’s useful idiots.

I mean no wonder it works these people react on emotion not thought. You can feel the emotion and anger in man of the libtards post that post here. Look at rifle, dtard, jarhead, cuntry and others.
 
Let me dumb this down for you: the protests aren't about police killing police. They are about police killing (and assaulting and discriminating against) blacks and getting away with it.

Black violence against black violence is being prosecuted. Police violence against blacks is not being prosecuted. That is what the protest is about.




Oh, so you do know about ratios? Now, go look at the ratio in the population of whites and blacks to see why your argument is stupid.

Now, I will say this: there is a legitimate argument you deplorables can make to refute my last comment. However, I know that none of you read and study enough about these subjects to have the knowledge about it. I will help: it was a study done by a tenured Harvard professor (who is black) and a bunch of his research students.

But don't worry. I also looked in-depth at that study when it came out a couple of years ago, and I found many holes in it which calls a lot of its findings into question.

Honest question: do you believe blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime compared to other races?
 
Let me dumb this down for you: the protests aren't about police killing police. They are about police killing (and assaulting and discriminating against) blacks and getting away with it.

Black violence against black violence is being prosecuted. Police violence against blacks is not being prosecuted. That is what the protest is about.




Oh, so you do know about ratios? Now, go look at the ratio in the population of whites and blacks to see why your argument is stupid.

Now, I will say this: there is a legitimate argument you deplorables can make to refute my last comment. However, I know that none of you read and study enough about these subjects to have the knowledge about it. I will help: it was a study done by a tenured Harvard professor (who is black) and a bunch of his research students.

But don't worry. I also looked in-depth at that study when it came out a couple of years ago, and I found many holes in it which calls a lot of its findings into question.
ewe dumb shit, i din't say anyting about police killing police, i know precisely what these mental midgets are protesting and it's senseless, other than, as i indicated, it's easy drama for pansy libs to draw attention to and get the drama started. there's few, very few situations where a black or white man has been killed by a cop where the person killed was following the law and didn't put themselves in the position to be shot. it's easy: follow the law and live.

you like ratios and populations? how about you look at the same ratios you asked me to then take a look at the ratio of blacks to whites incarcerated in this country. can't wait to hear your reasoning for that.

shouldn't you be out protesting the texas state flag or some monument on your afternoon off?
 
Last edited:
I support bob and kneeling by Kate Mara.

Seriously, I support anyone's right to protest damn near anything. I just do not care. Besides Cheeto telling you sheeple what to think, it is beyond me why you care either.
frankly, i'm probably one of the few on the right that really doesn't give a shit. hell, 9 chances out of 10 when i'm at a ball game, i'm out getting another beer during the anthem . . . who the hell am i to disparage anybody for doing whatever during the anthem? i'm not.

my gripe is i'm tired of hearing about it. the players have made it more than what it should be because trump made it more than what it should be. fvck 'em all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean Hammond
He’s googling and will get back with you

See, that's what a moron like you just doesn't understand. I don't enter into debates/discussions that I am not fully educated on. Unlike you, I don't make drive-by posts that have no logic. I don't have to Google anything, because I already know the end result. I have had these debates countless times, have a ton of ammo from studies I am already well aware of, and know the end result of what the opponent is going to try and argue.


you like ratios and populations? how about you look at the same ratios you asked me to then take a look at the ratio of blacks to whites incarcerated in this country. can't wait to hear your reasoning for that.

Incarceration rates are highly dependent on race and income disparity among the defendants. If you're white, you have a far lower chance of being incarcerated than a black charged with the same crime regardless of income. If you're rich, you have a far lower chance of being incarcerated than if you're poor and charged with the same crime.

That's basic shit and isn't really even debated, but rather, accepted by anyone who has spent any time on this subject.


Honest question: do you believe blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime compared to other races?

They are convicted of a disproportionate amount of crimes compared to other races. If by "commit," you actually mean "convicted," then yes. If you believe that the justice system doesn't have any flaws in arrest and prosecution based on income/race, then the answer to your question is "yes."
 
Let me ask you this rifle… Would you feel safer living in an all-white neighborhood in Birmingham Alabama or an all-black neighborhood in Compton?
 
See, that's what a moron like you just doesn't understand. I don't enter into debates/discussions that I am not fully educated on. Unlike you, I don't make drive-by posts that have no logic. I don't have to Google anything, because I already know the end result. I have had these debates countless times, have a ton of ammo from studies I am already well aware of, and know the end result of what the opponent is going to try and argue.




Incarceration rates are highly dependent on race and income disparity among the defendants. If you're white, you have a far lower chance of being incarcerated than a black charged with the same crime regardless of income. If you're rich, you have a far lower chance of being incarcerated than if you're poor and charged with the same crime.

That's basic shit and isn't really even debated, but rather, accepted by anyone who has spent any time on this subject.




They are convicted of a disproportionate amount of crimes compared to other races. If by "commit," you actually mean "convicted," then yes. If you believe that the justice system doesn't have any flaws in arrest and prosecution based on income/race, then the answer to your question is "yes."

To me, the funny thing is one can both acknowledge young black males commit a disproportional amount of crime and agree the criminal justice system is tilted against the poor and blacks.
 
Race differences in violent crime still exist even after weighing for socioeconomic status.

I'd argue it is a cultural issue, and the issue at the top is the breakdown of the African-American family.
Yes. Ding ding ding. Thanks to the Dems
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT