Kate Mara supports flag kneelers.

[big_country90]

I want a logical argument, but I know I won't get that out of you.

My top half, being white, would feel safer in Birmingham. My bottom half, being black, would feel safer in most places other than the deep south.

Now, your point?

I want an honest answer, not another joke intended to avoid answering my question. Murox asked a simple question that is easily verifiable, yet your ideology refuses to allow you to give an honest, direct answer because it contradicts your liberalism. Same thing with my question. We both know you'd feel much safer in an all white neighborhood because white people commit far fewer crimes per capita. That's not a racist comment, but a statement of fact. It has nothing to do with the justice system and everything to do with the culture in which they grow up and gravitate towards.

So answer my question honestly.

 

[Bankerreturns]

I support bob and kneeling by Kate Mara.

Seriously, I support anyone's right to protest damn near anything. I just do not care. Besides Cheeto telling you sheeple what to think, it is beyond me why you care either.

I also support Kate Mara kneeling.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

I want an honest answer, not another joke intended to avoid answering my question. Murox asked a simple question that is easily verifiable, yet your ideology refuses to allow you to give an honest, direct answer because it contradicts your liberalism.
.

How does any answer in those two questions contradict "liberalism?" I didn't know if Murox meant commit or if he actually intended to say "convict," which is entirely different.

That's not a racist comment, but a statement of fact. It has nothing to do with the justice system and everything to do with the culture in which they grow up and gravitate towards.
.

It is a racist comment when you fail to acknowledge that poor whites also have substantially higher crime rates than the national average. Would you feel safer in Baldwin Hills, an affluent black area in California, or numerous white areas throughout rural West Virginia (of even Huntington or Charleston)? The reasonable choice would be Baldwin Hills.

Let me ask you this rifle… Would you feel safer living in an all-white neighborhood in Birmingham Alabama or an all-black neighborhood in Compton?

It would depend on what neighborhood. You don't know this, but Birmingham has a far higher violent crime rate than Compton. So your question doesn't have an obvious of an answer as you think, unless of course, you're a racist.

 

[big_country90]

How does any answer in those two questions contradict "liberalism?" I didn't know if Murox meant commit or if he actually intended to say "convict," which is entirely different.

My guess is since he typed the word "commit" and not "convict" then he clearly meant "commit."

Read his sentence and replace the word "commit" with "convict" and it makes no sense.

Let's read it your way, instead of the way murox actually wrote it. "Honest question: do you believe blacks convict a disproportionate amount of crime compared to other races?" See how stupid that sounds?

It's funny how often reading comprehension fails you. Pretty ironic.

And they contradict your liberalism because liberalism has the inability to admit facts when it flies in the face of the agenda you push, especially when race is involved.

Now answer my question.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Let's read it your way, instead of the way murox actually wrote it. "Honest question: do you believe blacks convict a disproportionate amount of crime compared to other races?" See how stupid that sounds?

It's funny how often reading comprehension fails you. Pretty ironic.

Now answer my question.

You're the perfect example of why college degrees, outside of elite schools, are pretty worthless these days.

My comment referred to a common error people make by using the concepts of "commit" and "convict" interchangeably, not necessarily the exact placement of the word in a sentence.

Many people use "innocent" and "not guilty" interchangeably, and incorrectly, but it wouldn't work with one being replaced with the other in a sentence.

And I answered your question. It depends on which specific neighborhoods. As I mentioned, Compton has a far lower violent crime rate than Birmingham. I know that is a surprise to you, Grand Wizard, but that's why I can't answer your generalization without knowing the exact neighborhood.

 

[big_country90]

You're the perfect example of why college degrees, outside of elite schools, are pretty worthless these days.

My comment referred to a common error people make by using the concepts of "commit" and "convict" interchangeably, not necessarily the exact placement of the word in a sentence.

Many people use "innocent" and "not guilty" interchangeably, and incorrectly, but it wouldn't work with one being replaced with the other in a sentence.

And I answered your question. It depends on which specific neighborhoods. As I mentioned, Compton has a far lower violent crime rate than Birmingham. I know that is a surprise to you, Grand Wizard, but that's why I can't answer your generalization without knowing the exact neighborhood.

"Commit" and "convict" have very different meanings. I'm pretty certain murox knows the difference. And, again, you're the one who said it, not me.

Keep giving me a BS answer, Harvey. It really is sad to see how far you've fallen over the years. You're completely off the reservation and this is just a prime example.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

"Commit" and "convict" have very different meanings. I'm pretty certain murox knows the difference. And, again, you're the one who said it, not me.

Yes, but people tend to use the principles interchangeably, as I explained earlier. It's widely accepted that somebody who isn't convicted isn't necessarily innocent of something. So to claim that a certain group commits more crimes, like Murox did, without acknowledging the justice system's bias in stops/arrests/convictions based on things like race and income, really is a misleading question to ask.

Keep giving me a BS answer, Harvey. It really is sad to see how far you've fallen over the years. You're completely off the reservation and this is just a prime example.

I don't know why this is so hard for you to understand. You think any reasonable person would pick Birmingham as a safer place than Compton. That's because you just aren't intelligent enough to have known that Birmingham's violent crime rate is far higher than Compton's.

So why do you find it so difficult to understand that a person would want to know which particular areas of each city before selecting where they would feel/be safer? Statistics as a whole for each city contradicts what you were trying to infer.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Yes. Ding ding ding. Thanks to the Dems

It's a lot more complicated than D and R, and people thinking that way is a big reason we can't even begin to solve problems.

 

[mlblack16.]

You don't know this, but Birmingham has a far higher violent crime rate than Compton.

(based on the 2000 census) "The racial makeup of Birmingham was 62.46% Black, 35.07% White, 0.17% Native American, 0.80% Asian, 0.04% Pacific Islander, 0.62% from other races, and 0.83% from two or more races. 1.55% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race."

 

[sistersville]

I want an honest answer, not another joke intended to avoid answering my question. Murox asked a simple question that is easily verifiable, yet your ideology refuses to allow you to give an honest, direct answer because it contradicts your liberalism. Same thing with my question. We both know you'd feel much safer in an all white neighborhood because white people commit far fewer crimes per capita. That's not a racist comment, but a statement of fact. It has nothing to do with the justice system and everything to do with the culture in which they grow up and gravitate towards.

So answer my question honestly.

He won't answer. The man is an idiot not a very smart man

 

[19MU88]

It's a lot more complicated than D and R, and people thinking that way is a big reason we can't even begin to solve problems.

problems are being solved right now. relax.

 

[19MU88]

(based on the 200 census) "The racial makeup of Birmingham was 62.46% Black, 35.07% White, 0.17% Native American, 0.80% Asian, 0.04% Pacific Islander, 0.62% from other races, and 0.83% from two or more races. 1.55% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race."

Well, based on those demographics....we can only conclude that Rifle is, in fact, a racist.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

problems are being solved right now. relax.

 

[WV-FAN]

He won't answer. The man is an idiot not a very smart man

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

(based on the 2000 census) "The racial makeup of Birmingham was 62.46% Black, 35.07% White, 0.17% Native American, 0.80% Asian, 0.04% Pacific Islander, 0.62% from other races, and 0.83% from two or more races. 1.55% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race."

Are you trying to make a point? Really, you act like you're enlightening me on something. I am the one who had to enlighten BC on the violent crime rate between the two cities which blows his attempt to pieces. You don't think I knew the demographic of both cities, including that Compton is about 2/3 Hispanic?

 

[mlblack16.]

Are you trying to make a point? Really, you act like you're enlightening me on something. I am the one who had to enlighten BC on the violent crime rate between the two cities which blows his attempt to pieces. You don't think I knew the demographic of both cities, including that Compton is about 2/3 Hispanic?

You were trying to insinuate that Birmingham had far more crime than Compton, even though it was more "white," which clearly it is not.

Granted, @big_country90 made the mistake of assuming Birmingham was predominately white, so you were attempting to leverage his incorrect assumption.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

You were trying to insinuate that Birmingham had far more crime than Compton, even though it was more "white," which clearly it is not.
.

Birmingham IS far more white than Compton. It isn't even close.

Ever been to Compton? It's exclusively Hispanics (primarily) and blacks. You can spend all day driving around trying to find a white person, Asian person, or anyone other than an Hispanic or black.