Whenever I go to Marshall games with my family I try to take in the local museums, historical sites, etc. Visiting the Lorraine Hotel in Memphis and the School Book Depository in Dallas are examples. Yesterday before the game I took my family to the May 4th Museum on the Kent campus. This is a museum that highlights the May 4th, 1970 Ohio National Guard shooting of the Kent State students. I walked the common area and took the walking tour that recreated the events. There was a memorial set up on the spot where each kid died. Some of the pictures from that event are iconic and it's kind of a strange feeling to stand in the spot that they took place. I enjoyed my visit and found the museum excellent in depicting the turbulence of that era.
I think I know where most stand from your posting history, but I'm curious about your thoughts. I've been known to be somewhat fiscally conservative, but I can't stand with a conservative viewpoint on this. The National Guards putting bullets into those kids was an amazingly poor decision. It rests on the shoulders of the Ohio Governor.
The night before the ROTC building was destroyed and burned to the ground. Of course the destruction of property is wrong and I would fully support the full prosecution of those found guilty. But does the arson and destruction of that building give the right to shoot bullets into a crowd of kids who are doing nothing but exercising their constitutional right to assemble and protest the invasion of Cambodia? Some kids threw rocks at the NG. Again...wrong. But spray the crowd for the acts of a few?
I think it was a sad time in our history. Hopefully we've learned. But where do you stand?
I think I know where most stand from your posting history, but I'm curious about your thoughts. I've been known to be somewhat fiscally conservative, but I can't stand with a conservative viewpoint on this. The National Guards putting bullets into those kids was an amazingly poor decision. It rests on the shoulders of the Ohio Governor.
The night before the ROTC building was destroyed and burned to the ground. Of course the destruction of property is wrong and I would fully support the full prosecution of those found guilty. But does the arson and destruction of that building give the right to shoot bullets into a crowd of kids who are doing nothing but exercising their constitutional right to assemble and protest the invasion of Cambodia? Some kids threw rocks at the NG. Again...wrong. But spray the crowd for the acts of a few?
I think it was a sad time in our history. Hopefully we've learned. But where do you stand?