ADVERTISEMENT

Lots of fibbery talk from greed

Better check his comments about taking out the Iraqi General.

Better check there is no real opposition to Trump in the GOP primary, so I will have to vote for the Dem least likely to be a fvck-up or an empty head.

If Justin Amash ran for the GOP POTUS nomination I would vote for him.

Indiana is an open primary. I have no party affiliation and may choose either ballot. And I do not know the county officials running very well, I just moved to this county last summer and the incumbent sheriff does a good job and has no opponent...I don't even know what party he is anyway. My town (yes, it is chartered as a town, like Barboursville) had its elections last year. Its school board is local to this town only. This town does its own thing verses any control from the county really. My only real vote I have of consequence is choosing the most decent Dem for the nomination.
 
Better check there is no real opposition to Trump in the GOP primary, so I will have to vote for the Dem least likely to be a fvck-up or an empty head.

If Justin Amash ran for the GOP POTUS nomination I would vote for him.

Indiana is an open primary. I have no party affiliation and may choose either ballot. And I do not know the county officials running very well, I just moved to this county last summer and the incumbent sheriff does a good job and has no opponent...I don't even know what party he is anyway. My town (yes, it is chartered as a town, like Barboursville) had its elections last year. Its school board is local to this town only. This town does its own thing verses any control from the county really. My only real vote I have of consequence is choosing the most decent Dem for the nomination.
you won't vote for anybody running against trump because they pose "no real opposition" but you'll vote for someone that obviously poses "no real opposition" on the other side. alrighty then!
 
you won't vote for anybody running against trump because they pose "no real opposition" but you'll vote for someone that obviously poses "no real opposition" on the other side. alrighty then!

He has a better chance of winning something than Joe Walsh or Bill Weld.

Now, if the REAL Joe Walsh was running, he might have a chance.
 
what in the wide world are you talking about. jumping the shark even for you!

Greed not doing well, since Trump has turned the people of Iran against the greed supported Iranian regime.

Then you admitting the liar in chief is responsible for the downing of the Ukranian airliner.

The reason for the protests is for the downing of the Ukranian airliner. If the liar in chief is responsible for the protests in Iran, then he is responsible for the downing of the Ukranian airliner.
 
The reason for the protests is for the downing of the Ukranian airliner. If the liar in chief is responsible for the protests in Iran, then he is responsible for the downing of the Ukranian airliner.
i'm not sure Rachel Maddow would have connected the dots so eloquently as you just did, but then again, perhaps she would have. congratulations for being a moron, fibber
 
  • Like
Reactions: HerdFan76
i'm not sure Rachel Maddow would have connected the dots so eloquently as you just did, but then again, perhaps she would have. congratulations for being a moron, fibber

Few people can stick their foot in their mouths as well as you do. Lying moron.
 
again, just for shits and grins

THIS IS WHAT EG ACTUALLY BELIEVES:


https://www.thedailybeast.com/insid...11-and-the-holocaust-on-psychiatry?ref=scroll

Some of the museum’s claims stem from legitimate concerns—spikes in antidepressant use, the overdiagnosis of ADHD, skyrocketing pharmaceutical costs, and historical tragedies, from lobotomies to racist experiments to abusive institutionalization. But the exhibits veer quickly and deeply into conspiracy. One panel charges 18th century physician Benjamin Rush, hailed by some as “the father of modern psychiatry,” with killing George Washington. WTF? Another writes off 9/11 as a plot from Osama bin Laden’s top aide, an Egyptian psychiatrist, in order to spur antidepressant sales in the newly traumatized American public. Wow. They describe the Holocaust as “a psychiatric movement that would cause the deaths of millions.” This is just fvcking sick.

The list goes on—school shootings, the Ku Klux Klan, apartheid, rape, segregation, slavery, plummeting test scores, torture (Jesus Christ, you people are crazy), mind control, the death of art, literature and creativity—all, in the eyes of the CCHR, societal ills owed to mental health care. The way they see it, psychiatry and its practitioners manipulate people, diagnose them with problems they don’t have, and offer solutions that don’t work. Per their website, it is “an industry driven by profit, its pretended help often resulting in death.” They describe psychiatry, in other words, the way their critics describe Scientology.

The Scientology element is key to understanding the museum—not just because it is the primary economic, cultural and spiritual force behind it—but because it answers a question the exhibits themselves don’t exactly address: Why does this exist?

When L. Ron Hubbard first founded Scientology back in 1950, he conceived of it as a kind of competitor to psychology. Hubbard’s first Scientology book, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, borrowed heavily from the writings of Sigmund Freud. It billed itself as “A Handbook of Dianetic Therapy’” identified “mental aberrations;” and it outlined the practice of “auditing,” where distressed patients would talk to professional counselors about their problems and feelings, in the hopes of reaching greater mental calm. At the time, Hubbard hoped that Dianetics would replace psychiatry, but the book only “evoked scorn,” University of Alberta sociologist Stephen Kent told Florida radio station WLRN in 2015. “By 1969, Hubbard had become so frustrated he went to war against the mental health professions.”

In the years since, the church has made many efforts to eradicate psychiatry whenever possible. After 9/11, for example, it launched the New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Project, a nonprofit aimed at helping first responders which promoted L. Ron Hubbard’s widely-criticized method of treating opiate addicts, called “Purification Rundown.” (Notably, it was the only charity Donald Trump’s foundation contributed to in the immediate aftermath of the attacks).
HAHAHA, the man you hate most might be a fellow cult member!
 
Another lie. You idiots bounce from lying about one subject to lying about another. No wonder you serve the orange jesus.
hubbard-teeth.gif
 
If there's a few people, there are usually mulitple mouths present.

Then wouldn't there also be "feet" and not only a "foot" involved? Or perhaps you envision one foot being placed in several mouths. You scientologist are freaks with your foot fetishes.

I guess this just illustrates the thread title. Instead of admitting your mistake, you just fib and spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Then wouldn't there also be "feet" and not only a "foot" involved? Or perhaps you envision one foot being placed in several mouths. You scientologist are freaks with your foot fetishes.

I guess this just illustrates the thread title. Instead of admitting your mistake, you just fib and spin.

I see your problem. It's that you're a moron.
See if you can understand it now....

michiganherd and banker can stick their foot in their mouths
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT