According to 24/7 composite rankings.
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=C-USA
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=C-USA
Now in 1st !
I'll save excitement for when they are here on campus, practicing and playing in a game.
Since when?I'll save excitement for when they are here on campus, practicing and playing in a game.
correctIf history holds a lesson, it's while today is nice how many recruits actually step foot on campus? This is a movie I've seen before.
It's like getting a good hand in a card game, but step 2 is knowing how to play the cards.
Hope for the best.
But, but, but, doc sucks as a recruiter...... (sarcasm)
Recruiting is one thing , getting the needed results from the recruits is another deal all together. While he may be able to recruit (on paper) the program ( in a seriously weak (listed as a D1 conference) conference fails to in and out of conference consistently provide the results you would think would be provided in said weak conference.
Will be interesting to see how the one armed transfer QB pans out as well as the results of the two major college OOC games.
According to the 247 Composite
#2 - CUSA
#7 - G5
#71 - Overall
She's a cruel bitch!That lady named attrition just sitting in the cut licking her chops!!
Not true. Rivals only considers each school's top 20 commitments in their team rankings. I don't know how the other sites do it.The total points ranking that keeps getting referenced on here is extremely misleading.
Each player signed gives a team points. Marshall was credited with 30 signees, while FIU had 24. Yet FIU finished just .03 points away, because they were signing higher rated players on average. In looking at average player rankings - a far better barometer - the story is much different.
Not true. Rivals only considers each school's top 20 commitments in their team rankings. I don't know how the other sites do it.
I believe the numerical ratings are taken into account in the total point rankings, so a school with ten 5.7 3-star recruits will score higher than a school with ten 5.5 3-star recruits. But like you, I'd still like to see an average numerical rating; it would be so simple to do.One thing I wish Rivals did was an average numerical rating in addition to average star rating.
Why should a 5.7/3 Star be considered the same as a 5.5/3 Star if you're doing averages?
Should go up a little. Convinced the regional guys to rate Jiles a 5.5.
Is it sad the for some reason I read your post and had to re-read it because I thought it said you convinced the regional jail guys....More coffee asap.....
I believe the numerical ratings are taken into account in the total point rankings, so a school with ten 5.7 3-star recruits will score higher than a school with ten 5.5 3-star recruits. But like you, I'd still like to see an average numerical rating; it would be so simple to do.
Correct.
Also, FIU’s entire class was built around two JC DTs who I believe won’t qualify.
To be fair, we will have our fair share of NQs in this class but most (if not all) of them will enroll in school and eventually play for MU unlike the JC DTs (if they don’t qualify).
Do we know how many of this class will be futures?
That percentage is about 92% that actually enroll at MU.If history holds a lesson, it's while today is nice how many recruits actually step foot on campus? This is a movie I've seen before.
Not true. Rivals only considers each school's top 20 commitments in their team rankings. I don't know how the other sites do it.
I'll save excitement for when they are here on campus, practicing and playing in a game.
CUSA isnt weak and recruited well as a whole this year for a G5 conference
At first, I read it that way too, lol.Is it sad the for some reason I read your post and had to re-read it because I thought it said you convinced the regional jail guys....More coffee asap.....