Anyone ignoring the noise from the little kids in congress and in the media would know it wasn't going to be anything big.It's not the bombshell it was made out to be.
yeah, agreed. hell, i've read forums of conspirators claiming people would be going to jail and all kinds of crazy shit. i'm reading that shit thinking, yeah, people ain't going to jail because the release of a memo. if people going to jail over what's in the memo, they'd already be in cuffs, wouldn't have to wait for a memo to be declassified.It's not the bombshell it was made out to be.
is that referring to the same investigation, though? serious question. it merely indicates "an FBI counterintelligence investigation", doesn't refer specifically to the trump/russia collusion investigation in that specific statement.Very interesting take in the memo that blows a huge hole in its entire assumption
yeah, agreed. hell, i've read forums of conspirators claiming people would be going to jail and all kinds of crazy shit. i'm reading that shit thinking, yeah, people ain't going to jail because the release of a memo. if people going to jail over what's in the memo, they'd already be in cuffs, wouldn't have to wait for a memo to be declassified.
okay, serious question: it was posed by dems that declassifying this memo would be detrimental to national security. what part of the memo is detrimental to national security? it appears as though they simply didn't want it released to protect their interests of bullshit claims. now, they have a double layer of egg on their face: 1) using a DNC/Clinton funded/driven dossier to initiate an investigation that cost taxpayers a shit load of money into something they had made themselves believe occurred . . . that didn't, and 2) screaming "breach of national security" on something that isn't even in the same hemisphere when it comes to a breach of national security.
okay, serious question: it was posed by dems that declassifying this memo would be detrimental to national security. what part of the memo is detrimental to national security? it appears as though they simply didn't want it released to protect their interests of bullshit claims. now, they have a double layer of egg on their face: 1) using a DNC/Clinton funded/driven dossier to initiate an investigation that cost taxpayers a shit load of money into something they had made themselves believe occurred . . . that didn't, and 2) screaming "breach of national security" on something that isn't even in the same hemisphere when it comes to a breach of national security.
You have Republicans on one side saying this memo is proof of fbi corruption and Democrats trying to stop its release. The truth probably is somewhere in the middle.
back to 2013, wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy before trump stepped up to run for POTUS . . . and win.The initial warrant goes back to 2013, before the dossier even existed.
Good lord you are an idiot.
That whole memo was a “nothingburger.”
If you all don’t think this is a big scandal then you’re simply being partisan. The FBI approached FISA for warrants to be able to spy on Trump’s team and used the dossier as their basis, without telling FISA that the dossier was created solely for political purposes and paid for by Clinton and the DNC... even though James Comey and the FBI knew that was the case.
Corruption at the highest level.
The initial warrant goes back to 2013, before the dossier even existed.
Good lord you are an idiot.
That whole memo was a “nothingburger.”
If you all don’t think this is a big scandal then you’re simply being partisan. The FBI approached FISA for warrants to be able to spy on Trump’s team and used the dossier as their basis, without telling FISA that the dossier was created solely for political purposes and paid for by Clinton and the DNC... even though James Comey and the FBI knew that was the case.
Corruption at the highest level.
If you all don’t think this is a big scandal then you’re simply being partisan. The FBI approached FISA for warrants to be able to spy on Trump’s team and used the dossier as their basis, without telling FISA that the dossier was created solely for political purposes and paid for by Clinton and the DNC... even though James Comey and the FBI knew that was the case.
Corruption at the highest level.
No we all know where Dtard is RIP.lol, dtard disappears, nutcase reappears.
lol, dtard disappears, nutcase reappears.
That's another thing that didn't meet my expectations.
Based on the comments by the Democrats, I expected this memo to be some kind of step-by-step manual on how to take down the American government.
The initial warrant goes back to 2013, before the dossier even existed.
Good lord you are an idiot.
That whole memo was a “nothingburger.”
You must be a very insecure person.
There's also no characterization of the information used to re-up the warrant (again, Page was already under FISA) as being false. I personally don't care where information came from if it is true...and neither does the law. CIs are paid. Spies are paid and paid for info.
"CI's" are paid by political opponents to write "intelligence" reports (aka "dossier") on their competition, so warrants can be obtained for unprecedented government monitoring of an opponent?
And yes, today's memo stated the most important support for the reinstituted FISA warrant was the dossier......(which still remains uncorroborated)
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/house-intel-memo-released-what-it-says/article/2647937
See post 16, moron.
I don't get your reply here...are you claiming the information was false?
I’m claiming the dossier (paid for by Clinton surrogates) has not been proven to be accurate.Cool story, bro. Have the parts of it used for the FISA warrant been proven untrue? And it's exactly like any informant Intel used for a warrant.
And was Page not a part of the campaign at that time? Or am I just totalling misreading the timeline?
I’m claiming the dossier (paid for by Clinton surrogates) has not been proven to be accurate. And that it was used primarily to reinstate FISA warrants to monitor campaign activities of the opposing party’s candidacy....which ultimately has lead to a frivolous independent counsel investigation. This is really nothing like the CI analogy you offered.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456089/memo-released-what-should-come-next
There must have been more than just the dossier to get three separate renewals.
Accept for the fact the memo says otherwise.
Accept for the fact the memo says otherwise.