Mueller DID NOT subpoena Trump financial records

[herdfan429]

Looks like Bloomberg blew their load a little early just like ABC.


“We have confirmed that the news reports that the Special Counsel had subpoenaed financial records relating to the president are false. No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources,” Trump’s lawyer John Dowd wrote in an email Dec. 5.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-said-to-be-subpoenaed-by-mueller

 

[countryroads89]

LMAO!

That same attorney said the POTUS couldn't obstruct justice.

You are a special kind of stupid. I can understand someone getting fooled yesterday but now an entire 24 hours late?

LMAO!

 

[herdfan429]

LMAO!

That same attorney said the POTUS couldn't obstruct justice.

You are a special kind of stupid. I can understand someone getting fooled yesterday but now an entire 24 hours late?

LMAO!

Alan Dershowitz said basically the same thing regarding obstruction. LAst time I checked he wasnt a republican.

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

Alan Dershowitz said basically the same thing regarding obstruction. LAst time I checked he wasnt a republican.

Cuntry trying his best to one-up Al Green.

 

[dherd]

LMAO!

That same attorney said the POTUS couldn't obstruct justice.

You are a special kind of stupid. I can understand someone getting fooled yesterday but now an entire 24 hours late?

LMAO!

AFTER EVERYTHING THAT HAS HAPPENED THE LAST 2 YRS. AFTER ALL THE PROVEN
BOLD FACED LIES THESE FOOLS STILL BELIEVE TRUMP.
AMAZING!

 

[raleighherdfan]

Another lefty premise......

 

[SamSwimmer]

AFTER EVERYTHING THAT HAS HAPPENED THE LAST 2 YRS. AFTER ALL THE PROVEN
BOLD FACED LIES THESE FOOLS STILL BELIEVE TRUMP.
AMAZING!

holy crap. all caps and bold? good job, sis

 

[countryroads89]

Alan Dershowitz said basically the same thing regarding obstruction. LAst time I checked he wasnt a republican.

And practically every single attorney in the US disagrees. You keep riding that Dershowitz train.

 

[countryroads89]

Alan Dershowitz said basically the same thing regarding obstruction. LAst time I checked he wasnt a republican.

Yet Nixon was impeached for it.

Strange.

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

And practically every single attorney in the US disagrees.

Now that is Raoulish!

 

[herdfan429]

Yet Nixon was impeached for it.

Strange.

If you weren’t so dense you would know that they were referring to trump firing Comey since let’s be honest that’s the lefts bew attack plan

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Alan Dershowitz said basically the same thing regarding obstruction. LAst time I checked he wasnt a republican.

He's a smart guy, but he lost all credibility when he helped defend OJ after running his mouth saying he was guilty as sin.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

John Dowd can suck my and Pete Rose's dicks.

 

[ARandomHerdFan]

John Dowd can suck my and Pete Rose's dicks.

That sounds like herdfan06's kind of party.

 

[extragreen]

Mueller DID NOT subpoena Trump financial records

You don't know that.

 

[herdfan429]

Mueller DID NOT subpoena Trump financial records

You don't know that.

Did you say this in the thread about mueller subpoenaing his records?

 

[extragreen]

Did you say this in the thread about mueller subpoenaing his records?

Nope. I said "uh oh".

From Handelsblatt: "“It remains unclear whether Mr. Mueller requested information on President Trump’s own business dealings with Deutsche Bank or on those of people close to him.” But they stand by their story that Deutsche Bank received a subpoena...."From our end, Handelsblatt can confirm that Deutsche Bank has been subpoenaed."

 

[herdfan429]

Nope. I said "uh oh".

From Handelsblatt: "“It remains unclear whether Mr. Mueller requested information on President Trump’s own business dealings with Deutsche Bank or on those of people close to him.” But they stand by their story that Deutsche Bank received a subpoena...."From our end, Handelsblatt can confirm that Deutsche Bank has been subpoenaed."

No one denied the bank was subpoenaed moron. Only the subject of the subpoena. Try to pay attention

 

[extragreen]

No one denied the bank was subpoenaed moron. Only the subject of the subpoena. Try to pay attention

Some idiot started a thread with the title that he had no proof of and it went something like this:
Mueller DID NOT subpoena Trump financial records

 

[herdfan429]

Some idiot started a thread with the title that he had no proof of and it went something like this:
Mueller DID NOT subpoena Trump financial records

No proof?!?!There was just as much proof in the article I linked as there was to the original.

 

[extragreen]

No proof?!?!There was just as much proof in the article I linked as there was to the original.

Except one came from a respected news agency and the other from cheetos lawyer.

 

[herdfan429]

Except one came from a respected news agency and the other from cheetos lawyer.

Bloomberg isn't respected?

 

[extragreen]

Bloomberg isn't respected?

Is that cheetos's lawyer's name?

 

[herdfan429]

Is that cheetos's lawyer's name?

Read the link. There is another source mentioned

 

[extragreen]

Read the link. There is another source mentioned

what source other than cheetos's attorney denies the bank has been subpoenaed?

 

[herdfan429]

Deutsche Bank AG provided records to special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s investigation after receiving a subpoena several weeks ago, according to a person briefed on the matter.


Those records pertain to people affiliated with President Donald Trump, said the person, who asked not to be identified because the action hasn’t been announced. Several news outlets -- including Bloomberg -- reported yesterday that the subpoena targeted Trump and his family’s bank records, which was disputed by Trump’s personal lawyer and the White House.


It was the first two paragraphs. Learn to read

 

[extragreen]

Deutsche Bank AG provided records to special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s investigation after receiving a subpoena several weeks ago, according to a person briefed on the matter.


Those records pertain to people affiliated with President Donald Trump, said the person, who asked not to be identified because the action hasn’t been announced. Several news outlets -- including Bloomberg -- reported yesterday that the subpoena targeted Trump and his family’s bank records, which was disputed by Trump’s personal lawyer and the White House.


It was the first two paragraphs. Learn to read

Only 1 source in those 2 paragraphs deny that cheetos information was under subpoena, except the White House of course. I'd believe the attorney before I'd believe the White House.

 

[herdfan429]

Only 1 source in those 2 paragraphs deny that cheetos information was under subpoena, except the White House of course. I'd believe the attorney before I'd believe the White House.

Wtf does this even mean? Now that’s three sources. Whites house white house attorney and this unnamed source

 

[extragreen]

Wtf does this even mean? Now that’s three sources. Whites house white house attorney and this unnamed source

It means the source did not exclude cheetos from the subpoena.