Remember when you would get banned from social media for saying this?
Myocarditis Effect Confirmed by NBC
No, that's not what the article said. Is it an intelligence thing or an honesty thing that frequently leads to you misrepresenting things?
That's not what I said, now is it? I pointed out that the drunk preacher once again posted a misleading headline.So, since you have a history of being wrong on virtually everything, are you going on record as saying there are no reasons for Pfizer and Moderna to recognize and track adverse health effects including myocarditis? Especially when the CDC was reporting on this as early as April 2021?
Oh, and by the way grammar cop, I'm interested to see why you reference a current article, in timing, content and presentation on nbcnews.com, as said instead of says...
Well, what did it say?That's not what I said, now is it? I pointed out that the drunk preacher once again posted a misleading headline.
I knew this board's overall intelligence level would take a drastic hit with my departure, but I didn't expect it to go quite this low.
Why did I reference that particular article? Because it was the one the original poster posted and the one he based his subject of the thread on.
Was that really too difficult for you to understand? That's how this message board thing works: people post something and others respond to it.
Why did I reference that particular article? Because it was the one the original poster posted and the one he based his subject of the thread on.
Oh, and by the way grammar cop, I'm interested to see why you reference a current article, in timing, content and presentation on nbcnews.com, as said instead of says...
Read my post again. That's not what I asked.
Maybe you should focus more on reading comprehension and less on running spell check.
I read it multiple times. I had to in order to figure out what you were trying to communicate. As poorly as it is written, and as much as it doesn't make sense how it is written, the only reasonable way to interpret that jumble is that you're asking why I am referencing the article in this thread and not a more current one or one from another source.
He's not the brightest bulb in the chandelierSo, in other words you can't answer the question because you don't understand it? Not surprising...
By the way, speaking of jumbles do you realize the one sentence you just posted contains 50 words?
Here is some more grammar homework since you so desperately need it...
Run-on Sentence: Why it's bad and the Best Ways to fix it – INK Blog
Run-on sentences, or fused sentences, happen without the proper punctuation. Get run-on sentence examples and definition here.blog.inkforall.com
Again, you're really bad at this. It isn't a run-on sentence at any level.So, in other words you can't answer the question because you don't understand it? Not surprising...
By the way, speaking of jumbles do you realize the one sentence you just posted contains 50 words?
Here is some more grammar homework since you so desperately need it...
Run-on Sentence: Why it's bad and the Best Ways to fix it – INK Blog
Run-on sentences, or fused sentences, happen without the proper punctuation. Get run-on sentence examples and definition here.blog.inkforall.com
A few hundred cases? Not everyone sought medical care for their vax-induced heart issues. A friend of mine got it after me begging him not to. He was playing a college sport at the time and they pressured him to get it.So like a few hundred cases out of 350 million doses given?
In a world where every medicine ad on TV tells me death is a possible side effect, color me as not caring one bit. You gotta break some eggs to make an omelet.
Follow links in Keeper's link and that is what you find.A few hundred cases?