NY TIMES HAS TRUMP'S '95 TAX RETURNS
- Thread starter dherd
- Start date
Just like with Hillary's e-mails, this changes nothing. Who is really going to change their vote over this stuff? The fence sitters are just liars who don't want to admit what they are, but whatever it is they're already it. It's not changing over this and e-mails.
I bet the hypocrites in this thread never take any deductions and gladly pay their full tax bill.
Trump's taking advantage of our inane and stupid tax laws is hardly a big story.
Trump's taking advantage of our inane and stupid tax laws is hardly a big story.
So? Did he do something illegal? Has he been in jail?
nope
so he knows the tax code good enough to take advantage of it. Sounds like EXACTLY the right person to fix the tax code...
nope
so he knows the tax code good enough to take advantage of it. Sounds like EXACTLY the right person to fix the tax code...
You might have had a point, except for the fact that he wants to give those who have the wealth to avoid taxes a bigger tax cut. In effect, he wants to give people like himself, who may not pay federal income taxes for years, a bigger break. When's the last time you paid 0 federal income tax?
I'm poor and have lots of kids. So thanks to the Child Tax Credit et al I have not paid federal income taxes in years.
I don't desire punitive tax structures for people just because they are rich so I don't really care how much they pay in taxes. This is all part of the reason we should switch to a consumption-based tax system instead of an income-based one.
So, you're a taker. Figures.
And your consumption based system would tax pretty much all of a poor persons income, since they spend all of it out of necessity, and cost less for the wealthy who save their money or perhaps invest it.
If I buy 199 12-packs of booze a $10/pack or buy 1 megayaht at $5.6 million who pays more in taxes?
it still baffles me how a CPA complains about a person using the tax code LEGALLY to avoid paying taxes. I don't see you libs bitching about rev al sharpton not paying his taxes.
If I buy 199 12-packs of booze at $10 a pack, and it takes 100% of my paycheck to do so, then I paid a consumption tax on my entire income. If I buy 1 mega yacht at 5.6 million and it only requires 70% of my income, who got taxed more on a percentage basis of their income?
based on his, guiliani's and his surrogates response to
this sadly he does not.
why you ask.
simple.
what tax return are the loss carryovers on?
his personal.
therefore taking them has nothing to do with
his "fiduciary duty to his stockholders".
trump or anyone else has the option to either
carry back the losses - which he did not do apparently
because he had no past income to apply them to or
carry them forward or simply ignore them. there is no
tax law that says you must carry the losses over.
i have no problem with him using the carryovers, i use them
at every opportunity - you would be crazy not to. BUT to say
he had to because of his fiduciary obligation is just plain
bull whoopy.
the real issue is that he lost $1,000,000,000.00 in one year
and claims to be a brilliant businessman.
not only did he lose a billion dollars in one year he lost it in
the casino business. has anyone ever heard of a las vegas
casino going bankrupt. one or two may have but i have not
heard of it. you have to be pretty inept to lose money in the
casino business.
and if you lose one billion dollars in a single year and that is
your claim to the presidency - you just look like a fool.
Greed, you ever take any money or pay employees under the table? you know a cash deal, not on the books?
Lolololololololol!!!
Hills AND the NYT did the same thing as trump!
Lolololololololol!!!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-hillary-used-same-tax-avoidance-scheme-trump
Hills AND the NYT did the same thing as trump!
Lolololololololol!!!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-hillary-used-same-tax-avoidance-scheme-trump
If he or hillary used the conviluted tax laws to their advantage, I have not problem with either of them on that point. what I have a problem with is the conviluted tax laws. Think Donald will be more likely to change them than hillary. not sure either will but Trump is more likely to do it.
Would the Times print Hillary's medical record if they got their hands on it knowing it would be used against her? If Trump didn't break the law & the Times printed that return without his permission - while admitting they knew they could be litigated (& they have), Trump's action against them could be very serious.
The company Obama runs had several years of losing a trillion, or more, dollars.
I can think of one way they would not need his permission: if his wife at that time gave it to them.
That would be an interesting situation. Because it would definitely come out in the suit that I assume he'll file against the Times.
illegal to take the t/r's
NOT illegal to print them.
IF
it is in the public interest
which it clearly is.
NYT IS 1st class A#1 news organization in the world they wouldn't act illegally
you can take that to the bank right along with anything dherd tells you.
we are equally authoritative.
NOT illegal to print them.
IF
it is in the public interest
which it clearly is.
NYT IS 1st class A#1 news organization in the world they wouldn't act illegally
you can take that to the bank right along with anything dherd tells you.
we are equally authoritative.
Lighten up a little on the shtick if you're going for humor. If you're going to have a parody account, the key is to do it intelligently.
Dtard, so now you are a CPA and an attorney?
You are so talented maybe Trump will appoint you as a member of his cabinet....or Ambassador to Belize since you are moving there after November anyway.
You are so talented maybe Trump will appoint you as a member of his cabinet....or Ambassador to Belize since you are moving there after November anyway.
Similar threads
