Why would the EPA director have any security?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/07/politics/epa-pruitt-security-detail/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/07/politics/epa-pruitt-security-detail/index.html
Because libs would kill him
Why would the EPA director have any security?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/07/politics/epa-pruitt-security-detail/index.html
Environazis are a notoriously violent bunch.
From the link the OP provided:
"According to EPA's assistant inspector general, Scott Pruitt has faced an unprecedented amount of death threats against him and his family," the agency said in a statement. "Americans should all agree that members of the President's Cabinet should be kept safe from these violent threats."
Exactly.
Why?
For the record: Extra doesn't consider the statement "I'm going to put a bullet in you brain" a threat.
For the record: you're just another liar and fit in real well with the cheese puffs on the board.
You made your bed. Sleep tight in it.
I never made the bed, moron, you invented one.
You're calling the EPA IG a cheetos factory?
For the record: Extra calls the EPA IG a liar.
For the record: I also call you a liar.
1) Instead of these BS responses can you disprove the findings of the EPA IG?
2) Why is this a partisan issue?
3) Why do you, Extra, think that a threat against an American isn't deplorable?
Can you prove them?
Because the party in power now sucks.
Once again, moron, I didn't say that. I stated that I don't believe the cheese factory when they say pruitt has had 5x as many death threats as his predecessor.
Can you prove them?
Because the party in power now sucks.
Once again, moron, I didn't say that. I stated that I don't believe the cheese factory when they say pruitt has had 5x as many death threats as his predecessor.
For the record: Extra doesn't consider the statement "I'm going to put a bullet in you brain" a threat.
You saw it on the internet, it must be true.
You proved my point with your grade school-like rebuttal. You'd be embarrassed for yourself if you weren't so unaware.
These are quoted threats. That's the proof.
Saying you don't believe the IG findings is idiotic. The IG is the end all/be all of investigations. Not agreeing with IG findings is like not agreeing the that Earth is round.
Do you have evidence it isn’t true?
I would say no charges filed against people making threats is a solid piece of evidence.
Sorry snowflakes.
IMO, he's got bigger issues than this security deal.He's a hillbilly politician with an inflated sense of ego and worth.
He was good guy. Only left a woman to die. Movie about it. That sure didn't alter his royal life.IMO, he's got bigger issues than this security deal.
Was on a business trip in Boston during the last century waiting in Logan airport for a plane to empty so I could board. Off the plane comes Sen. Ted Kennedy. Considering his family's history, I was shocked to see him with no security, but there he was all by himself....stopping and talking to people as he made his way to baggage claim. And it wasn't a cursory wave, handshake and smile....it was stopping to listen to these folks.
Politically, I was no Ted Kennedy fan, but I was impressed how he conducted himself that day. He didn't allow "threats" to alter his life.
owned againHuh. No charges filed against Trump either is a solid piece of evidence of no collusion.
See how that works libtard??
Anonymous Threats????????? Hellllo, Einstein.5x the threats, no charges filed. Probably because Pruitt is the forgiving type.![]()
Anonymous Threats????????? Hellllo, Einstein.
Anonymous Threats????????? Hellllo, Einstein.
Because they can't trace phone calls of threats made against top administration staff? Email? Text?
Your stupidity is impressive.