Putin predicts global 'chaos' if West hits Syria again

[dherd]

MOSCOW/DAMASCUS, April 15 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin warned on Sunday that further Western attacks on Syria would bring chaos to world affairs,

In a telephone conversation with his Iranian counterpart, Hassan Rouhani, Putin and Rouhani agreed that the Western strikes had damaged the chances of achieving a political resolution in the seven-year Syria conflict, according to a Kremlin statement.

"Vladimir Putin, in particular, stressed that if such actions committed in violation of the U.N. Charter continue, then it will inevitably lead to chaos in international relations," the Kremlin statement said.

GEE WIZ - I DONT REMEMBER ANY BOLD STATEMENTS LIKE THIS BEFORE HE PUT HIS
BITCH LYING TRAITOR DONALD TRUMP IN THE W.H.

NEVER HAPPENED WITH CLINTON OR OBAMA.

GREAT JOB CONS.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...t-hits-syria-again/ar-AAvTDwF?ocid=spartandhp

 

[i am herdman]

That is because they didn't do anything. Russia didn't do anything the last time.

And, wait. Don't you always say Trump is controlled by Russia? Which is it?

 

[dherd]

ITS THIS.
WHATTA YA EXPECT LYING TRAITOR DONALD TRUMP HAD TO GET PERMISSION FROM PUTIN BEFOR FIRING,
AFRAID PUTIN WOULD OUT HIM. ANNOUNCED IT 3 DAYS AHEAD OF TIME SO PUTING/SYRIA GET READY & MOVE EVERYTHING OF VALUE.

MIGHT FOOL HERDMAN - BUT HE DOESNT FOOL ME.

 

[i am herdman]

ITS THIS.
WHATTA YA EXPECT LYING TRAITOR DONALD TRUMP HAD TO GET PERMISSION FROM PUTIN BEFOR FIRING,
AFRAID PUTIN WOULD OUT HIM. ANNOUNCED IT 3 DAYS AHEAD OF TIME SO PUTING/SYRIA GET READY & MOVE EVERYTHING OF VALUE.

MIGHT FOOL HERDMAN - BUT HE DOESNT FOOL ME.

Laughable.

 

[Brushy Bill]

I guess Trump can fire Mueller now. The Russian collusion narrative is dead.

 

[dherd]

Laughable.

YOU THINK ITS FUNNY?

"Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and 'smart!' "

Trump tweeted that news early Wednesday

 

[i am herdman]

YOU THINK ITS FUNNY?

"Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and 'smart!' "

Trump tweeted that news early Wednesday

Yehh, he told the world what was going to happen and he did it.

 

[big_country90]

So Trump had super secret help from the Russian president to get elected and now Trump isn't doing what Putin tells him. As a matter of fact, he is doing the exact opposite of helping Russia. So tell me why doesn't Putin just come out and show us the evidence of collusion or simply say "yes, we helped Trump get elected" as payback for Trump's betrayal?

Why?

 

[extragreen]

So Trump had super secret help from the Russian president to get elected and now Trump isn't doing what Putin tells him. As a matter of fact, he is doing the exact opposite of helping Russia. So tell me why doesn't Putin just come out and show us the evidence of collusion or simply say "yes, we helped Trump get elected" as payback for Trump's betrayal?

Why?

For the same reason that bankers claimed they were forced by the federal government to loan money to customers who couldn't pay back the loans.

 

[SamSwimmer]

For the same reason that bankers claimed they were forced by the federal government to loan money to customers who couldn't pay back the loans.

your ignorance on banking is astounding

 

[dherd]

Yehh, he told the world what was going to happen and he did it.

HE PULLED THE SAME CRAP WHEN HE SAID "RUSSIER I HOPE YOU FIND THE 30,000 EMAILS -
YOU WILL BE RICHLY REWARDED".

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily ....”

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html

I ASK THE WORLD, WHAT WOULD HERDMAN BE SAYING IF CLINTON OR OBAMA HAD PULLED THAT CRAP?

 

[i am herdman]

HE PULLED THE SAME CRAP WHEN HE SAID "RUSSIER I HOPE YOU FIND THE 30,000 EMAILS -
YOU WILL BE RICHLY REWARDED".

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily ....”

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html

I ASK THE WORLD, WHAT WOULD HERDMAN BE SAYING IF CLINTON OR OBAMA HAD PULLED THAT CRAP?

You guys are going around in circles. Makes no sense.

 

[extragreen]

You guys are going around in circles. Makes no sense.

^^Said by a cheetos voter.^^
___irony

 

[SamSwimmer]

HE PULLED THE SAME CRAP WHEN HE SAID "RUSSIER I HOPE YOU FIND THE 30,000 EMAILS -
YOU WILL BE RICHLY REWARDED".

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily ....”

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html

I ASK THE WORLD, WHAT WOULD HERDMAN BE SAYING IF CLINTON OR OBAMA HAD PULLED THAT CRAP?

the FBI still hasn't examined the DNC server. hillary had classified information off site. the deal they worked out to let cheryl mills be hillary's attorney was ludicrous. yet they'll conduct early morning raids and run the risk of violating attorney client privilege to get trump. democrat schumer was right. they have six different ways to get back at you when you call them out.

 

[dherd]

You guys are going around in circles. Makes no sense.

YEP, WHEN THE ERROR OF YOUR WAYS IS POINTED OUT, AND YOUR CAUGHT IN THE LYING TRAITOR DONALD TRUMPS WEB OF TREACHERY - YOU CLAIM TO BE STUPID "MAKES NO SENSE"
COME ON HERDMAN YOU'RE NO DUMMY.

 

[19MU88]

nice thread with comical posts from two of the bigger libtards on the forum. funny stuff.

 

[herdfan429]

West won’t have to strike Syria again if the Russians don’t allow Assad to gas his own people

 

[extragreen]

Wait a minute....I thought "mission accomplished."
______deux

 

[WV-FAN]

so, let me get this straight.

- syria gases its citizens
- trump says he's going to bomb syria because of this
- putin says if the US does there will be consequences
- US bombs syria
- putin says if the US bombs syria again there will be chaos

liberals mad each step beginning to end . . . why?

you guys really do have a mental disorder.

 

[Dreh_Nagi_HC_IM]

you guys really do have a mental disorder.

Mental disorder? Perhaps, but my thoughts are they are truly un-American. Rooting for evil dictators, hoping like hell Americans would have been killed during a successful strike. Back in the day, these kind of folks would have been strung up, or shot in the heart. Not sure why we got away from that as a society. Just wondering why they don't move out of the country, if they hate America this much. Perhaps can't afford to move? Argentina won't give them a monthly check?

 

[WV-FAN]

Mental disorder? Perhaps, but my thoughts are they are truly un-American. Rooting for evil dictators, hoping like hell Americans would have been killed during a successful strike. Back in the day, these kind of folks would have been strung up, or shot in the heart. Not sure why we got away from that as a society. Just wondering why they don't move out of the country, if they hate America this much. Perhaps can't afford to move? Argentina won't give them a monthly check?

for fear a member of the LGBTQ community, transgender, or non-white would have their feelings hurt.

 

[extragreen]

Mitch McConnell 2018: ""This was a clear signal from America that Bashar al Assad can no longer use chemical weapons against his own people with impunity."
Mitch McConnell 2013: "A vital national security risk is clearly not at play, there are just too many unanswered questions about our long-term strategy in Syria, including the fact that this proposal is utterly detached from a wider strategy to end the civil war there, and on the specific question of deterring the use of chemical weapons, the President's proposal appears to be based on a contradiction. Either we will strike targets that threaten the stability of the regime — something the President says he does not intend to do — or we will execute a strike so narrow as to be a mere demonstration."

Paul Ryan 2018: "Tonight the United States responded."This action was appropriate and just."
Paul Ryan 2013: "I believe the President's proposed military strike in Syria cannot achieve its stated objectives. In fact, I fear it will make things worse."

Marco Rubio 2018:"the right move"
Marco Rubio 2013: "While I have long argued forcefully for engagement in empowering the Syrian people, I have never supported the use of U.S. military force in the conflict. And I still don't. I remain unconvinced that the use of force proposed here will work. The only thing that will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons in the future is for the Syrian people to remove him from power. The strike the administration wants us to approve I do not believe furthers that goal. And in fact, I believe U.S. military action of the type contemplated here might prove to be counterproductive."

Orrin Hatch 2018: approvingly tweeted of Trump's decision to attack on Thursday night
Orrin Hatch 2013: "What is clear is that launching a few missiles will do nothing to end Syria's civil war, and is neither a real strategy to stop the deployment of chemical weapons in Syria nor a guarantee that chemical weapons won't be used in the future by the Assad regime. That is not a plan for the region.
"That's why I continue to have strong reservations about authorizing the use of force against Syria."

Jason Chaffetz 2018: "God Bless the USA"
Jason Chaffetz 2013: "no clear and present danger to the USA to justify going to war in Syria."

Ted Poe 2018: "swift and decisive retaliation was an appropriate and proportional response to this horrific crime."
Ted Poe 2013: introduced a bill which would prohibit the use of funds for military action in Syria unless authorized by Congress.

 

[Brushy Bill]

Holy cow, did Extra just prove that politicians are full of shit?

 

[WV-FAN]

Mitch McConnell 2018: ""This was a clear signal from America that Bashar al Assad can no longer use chemical weapons against his own people with impunity."
Mitch McConnell 2013: "A vital national security risk is clearly not at play, there are just too many unanswered questions about our long-term strategy in Syria, including the fact that this proposal is utterly detached from a wider strategy to end the civil war there, and on the specific question of deterring the use of chemical weapons, the President's proposal appears to be based on a contradiction. Either we will strike targets that threaten the stability of the regime — something the President says he does not intend to do — or we will execute a strike so narrow as to be a mere demonstration."

Paul Ryan 2018: "Tonight the United States responded."This action was appropriate and just."
Paul Ryan 2013: "I believe the President's proposed military strike in Syria cannot achieve its stated objectives. In fact, I fear it will make things worse."

Marco Rubio 2018:"the right move"
Marco Rubio 2013: "While I have long argued forcefully for engagement in empowering the Syrian people, I have never supported the use of U.S. military force in the conflict. And I still don't. I remain unconvinced that the use of force proposed here will work. The only thing that will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons in the future is for the Syrian people to remove him from power. The strike the administration wants us to approve I do not believe furthers that goal. And in fact, I believe U.S. military action of the type contemplated here might prove to be counterproductive."

Orrin Hatch 2018: approvingly tweeted of Trump's decision to attack on Thursday night
Orrin Hatch 2013: "What is clear is that launching a few missiles will do nothing to end Syria's civil war, and is neither a real strategy to stop the deployment of chemical weapons in Syria nor a guarantee that chemical weapons won't be used in the future by the Assad regime. That is not a plan for the region.
"That's why I continue to have strong reservations about authorizing the use of force against Syria."

Jason Chaffetz 2018: "God Bless the USA"
Jason Chaffetz 2013: "no clear and present danger to the USA to justify going to war in Syria."

Ted Poe 2018: "swift and decisive retaliation was an appropriate and proportional response to this horrific crime."
Ted Poe 2013: introduced a bill which would prohibit the use of funds for military action in Syria unless authorized by Congress.

the commonality: short statement in full support in 2018. in 2013, each one of them throws out a diatribe in a feeble attempt to justify their "support" for the pussy footing of your super hero. not like they could come out and call obama out for being a huge cvnt.

 

[extragreen]

the commonality: short statement in full support in 2018. in 2013, each one of them throws out a diatribe in a feeble attempt to justify their "support" for the pussy footing of your super hero. not like they could come out and call obama out for being a huge cvnt.

you guys really do have a mental disorder.

 

[raleighherdfan]

Mitch McConnell 2018: ""This was a clear signal from America that Bashar al Assad can no longer use chemical weapons against his own people with impunity."
Mitch McConnell 2013: "A vital national security risk is clearly not at play, there are just too many unanswered questions about our long-term strategy in Syria, including the fact that this proposal is utterly detached from a wider strategy to end the civil war there, and on the specific question of deterring the use of chemical weapons, the President's proposal appears to be based on a contradiction. Either we will strike targets that threaten the stability of the regime — something the President says he does not intend to do — or we will execute a strike so narrow as to be a mere demonstration."

Paul Ryan 2018: "Tonight the United States responded."This action was appropriate and just."
Paul Ryan 2013: "I believe the President's proposed military strike in Syria cannot achieve its stated objectives. In fact, I fear it will make things worse."

Marco Rubio 2018:"the right move"
Marco Rubio 2013: "While I have long argued forcefully for engagement in empowering the Syrian people, I have never supported the use of U.S. military force in the conflict. And I still don't. I remain unconvinced that the use of force proposed here will work. The only thing that will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons in the future is for the Syrian people to remove him from power. The strike the administration wants us to approve I do not believe furthers that goal. And in fact, I believe U.S. military action of the type contemplated here might prove to be counterproductive."

Orrin Hatch 2018: approvingly tweeted of Trump's decision to attack on Thursday night
Orrin Hatch 2013: "What is clear is that launching a few missiles will do nothing to end Syria's civil war, and is neither a real strategy to stop the deployment of chemical weapons in Syria nor a guarantee that chemical weapons won't be used in the future by the Assad regime. That is not a plan for the region.
"That's why I continue to have strong reservations about authorizing the use of force against Syria."

Jason Chaffetz 2018: "God Bless the USA"
Jason Chaffetz 2013: "no clear and present danger to the USA to justify going to war in Syria."

Ted Poe 2018: "swift and decisive retaliation was an appropriate and proportional response to this horrific crime."
Ted Poe 2013: introduced a bill which would prohibit the use of funds for military action in Syria unless authorized by Congress.

Are you suggesting nothing has changed in 5 years??

Besides, we were told that John Kerry &Obama fixed the chemical weapons issue.

 

[SamSwimmer]