Do you think you could do any better? I could fix the crime issue there in a month, but my methods would not be acceptable to either party. Mass graves and burning entire blocks of the city to the ground tend to have poor optics.
It's not like all of Chicago is some dystopian nightmare. It's a few neighborhoods...can we name which ones and not be playing a race card?
So cute a compassionate trumptard.I never said that I could fix the problems. Besides it is not my job. The person in charge is one who needs to fix it, or move aside.
I don't care if it is only one section of town, or a few, the shootings need to stop.
He is over his head. JMO
The person in charge is one who needs to fix it, or move aside.
I don't care if it is only one section of town, or a few, the shootings need to stop.
He is over his head. JMO
The narrative about Chicago is entirely inaccurate.
Chicago’s murder rate is far, far below Cleveland’s (and even lower than many other cities), yet nobody talks about the issue in Cleveland. Hell, Chicago’s murder rate is the same as Cincinnati’s.
Simply because of tighter gun control regulations and Democratic leadership, morons like dogboy want to talk about Chicago.
Perhaps that’s because the people you vote for say that stricter gun control will prevent situations like this, when nothing could be further from the truth. They know it, and you know it.
But hey...NRA...right?
which cities are?Simple fact of the matter is Chicago is no where close to the top of murder rates per capita in the US.
If done across the board, it would.
Would you like to see studies showing how and where the weapons came from that are used in many of these Chicago murders? A high percentage of them were illegally obtained from states with far lower gun regulations. If done across the board (meaning all states), they wouldn't be nearly as easy to obtain for these Chicago culprits.
If you drain the Great Lakes that provide water to Niagara Falls, the Falls won't immediately stop. However, over time, the water will alleviate down to a trickle. Likewise, tighter gun regulations across the board won't immediately stop the violence in Chicago since there is a plethora of weapons. But, like the water in Niagara Falls, it will eventually reduce down to a trickle.
This isn't rocket science, though my analogy was pretty fvcking good.
which cities are?
Here's an idea: 20 years for straw purchases. 20 years for illegal possession of a firearm. Mandatory and no parole.
Memphis mayor is a democratOff the top of my head, in terms of major cities: New Orleans, Cleveland, St. Louis, Memphis, Baltimore, Kansas City, Detroit, and maybe Cincinnati.
Why do you think "The First 48" is always in Memphis, Kansas City, and St. Louis? Easy pickins' down in this Republican areas.
oh come on yaggs you know good well those cities and the areas in question are anything but GOP areas. St Louis is run by a demorat. The city has not had a Republican since 1949. Kansas City has an Indy. They have only had one Republican in charge since 1930. Memphis has a Democrat as Mayor. Try again that was really bad.Off the top of my head, in terms of major cities: New Orleans, Cleveland, St. Louis, Memphis, Baltimore, Kansas City, Detroit, and maybe Cincinnati.
Why do you think "The First 48" is always in Memphis, Kansas City, and St. Louis? Easy pickins' down in this Republican areas.
Congratulations! You have just supported gun reform!
As I have said on here for years, gun reform doesn't equate to taking away your 2nd Amendment "rights." It simply means common sense gun regulations that don't allow the access of guns to be far easier than the ability to legally drive a car.
what laws are we going to repeal in order to free up room in the prisons? don't get me wrong, i like the idea.Sorry, us law-abiding Hoosiers are not giving up our 2nd Amendment rights just because certain Chicago neighborhoods are shitholes.
Indiana guns stores follow all federal firearms laws....criminals do not.
Here's an idea: 20 years for straw purchases. 20 years for illegal possession of a firearm. Mandatory and no parole.
Memphis mayor is a democrat
Kansas City mayor is a democrat and is his name is Sly
St Louis mayor is a democrat
oh come on yaggs you know good well those cities and the areas in question are anything but GOP areas. St Louis is run by a demorat. The city has not had a Republican since 1949. Kansas City has an Indy. They have only had one Republican in charge since 1930. Memphis has a Democrat as Mayor. Try again that was really bad.
Let's get to the point.Those three cities are full of black young men who are killing each other.Those things would be relevant if the mayors were setting their state's gun laws, but that's not the case.
All three of those are solid red states, where Republicans set the gun laws.
If done across the board, it would.
Would you like to see studies showing how and where the weapons came from that are used in many of these Chicago murders? A high percentage of them were illegally obtained from states with far lower gun regulations. If done across the board (meaning all states), they wouldn't be nearly as easy to obtain for these Chicago culprits.
If you drain the Great Lakes that provide water to Niagara Falls, the Falls won't immediately stop. However, over time, the water will alleviate down to a trickle. Likewise, tighter gun regulations across the board won't immediately stop the violence in Chicago since there is a plethora of weapons. But, like the water in Niagara Falls, it will eventually reduce down to a trickle.
This isn't rocket science, though my analogy was pretty fvcking good.
Your post was pretty specific about purchasing regulations, as in Chicago vs surrounding states.
.
Let's get to the point.Those three cities are full of black young men who are killing each other.
what laws are we going to repeal in order to free up room in the prisons?
LOL...Ok. Criminals commit crimes. They don’t care about laws. Make it as difficult as you want to obtain a gun, and there will always be a black market waiting. The whole premise of the gun control debate is stupid.
If we can make people take multiple tests, wait a certain time, pay fees, have a database, prove their identity, have a background check, etc. to simply be able to drive a car, then we can do the same thing for those wanting to have a gun.
They are 90% white too. If our racial make up was the same what would our numbers be?Yes, there will always be a black market. Just ask Australia. After they basically banned guns (not entirely, but mostly), a small black market appeared. With increased penalties for those breaking gun laws, the black market is very, very small.
Really, take this suggestion and look at some facts- take a look at the murder rate of countries who have extremely tight gun laws with similar cultures to the U.S.
Look at those countries most similar to the U.S. in terms of culture, economics, etc . . . just brainstorm them: Canada, England, France, Spain, Germany, Australia, Netherlands, Sweden, Ireland, Italy, Switzerland, Norway, Poland, Denmark, Finland, Belgium . . . I am sure there are a few more that I have skipped.
Look at how many of those have gun regulations far tighter than the U.S. (that is pretty quick to answer). Look at how drastic the gun regulations are between those countries and the U.S. Then, look at the murder rate with all of those countries compared to the U.S.
I'm serious - put your political ideology aside and look at how drastic the numbers are between all of our fellow countries and us. Even though our economy is better than most of those countries, why is our murder rate so far higher? There is only one major relevant difference between those countries and the U.S. - it is the ease of access and amount of guns the U.S. allows.
Great show.Kelsey Grammar did a good job as mayor of Chicago.
The narrative about Chicago is entirely inaccurate.
Chicago’s murder rate is far, far below Cleveland’s (and even lower than many other cities), yet nobody talks about the issue in Cleveland. Hell, Chicago’s murder rate is the same as Cincinnati’s.
Simply because of tighter gun control regulations and Democratic leadership, morons like dogboy want to talk about Chicago.
He is so full of it. You have not figured that out?oh come on yaggs you know good well those cities and the areas in question are anything but GOP areas. St Louis is run by a demorat. The city has not had a Republican since 1949. Kansas City has an Indy. They have only had one Republican in charge since 1930. Memphis has a Democrat as Mayor. Try again that was really bad.