ADVERTISEMENT

Rasmussen polling

extragreen

Platinum Buffalo
Jan 2, 2007
80,714
4,475
113
A poll that historically appears conservatively biased......

Pre-debate poll on Sept. 22
Trump +5

Post debate on Sept 30
Hillary +1

Oct 3
Hillary +3
__________________________________

Couple weeks ago Faux News (liberally biased of course) :rolleyes:
Hillary +1

Sept 29 post debate
Hillary +3
___________________________________

If trump wins a couple more debates like he did the first one, hillary will win in a landslide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NKY_HerdFan
The fact those polls are so close shows what a horrible politician Hillary is and how sick the country is of the establishment politicians and media.
 
The fact is these polls show that trump did not win the debate. Just as I said.
 
Well if you cons don't do your job, then yeah, trump loses.....you need to:

""Go down to certain areas and watch and study make sure other people don't come in and vote five times." because " "I'm afraid the election’s gonna be rigged, I have to be honest." “I’m telling you, November 8th, we’d better be careful, because that election is going to be rigged,” and “I hope the Republicans are watching closely, or it’s going to be taken away from us.”

Don't say I didn't try to help you cons:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/lp/volunteer-to-be-a-trump-election-observer
 
Going with Nate Silver's prediction - the man does well year after year with March Madness.
 
a "random" poll of ~800 people have the election within the margin of error, therefor Hillary won the debate...

/moron

just an FYI, the last 4 losers in presidential elections also "won" the first debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
a "random" poll of ~800 people have the election within the margin of error, therefor Hillary won the debate...

/moron

just an FYI, the last 4 losers in presidential elections also "won" the first debate.

the rasmussen poll has moved from a +5 pre-debate result for trump to +3 for hillary in a post debate result. As I said before, you cons hitch your wagons to those horoscope polls.
 
damn eg cons were praising polls last week
wonder what happened - now the polls are
crooked.

just wait - the news is not getting any better
for the condinistas after the weekend news
they will be looking back at these polls as
the good ol days. but still they lie and deny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: extragreen
link where somebody in this thread said the polls were "crooked"?

i see:

-she must be terrible to be this close this late
-Trump has no chance
-Going with Nate Silver
-the last 4 losers in presidential elections also "won" the first debate
 
link where somebody in this thread said the polls were "crooked"?

I imagine dherd comment has to do with the following rubbish you cons spouted right after the debate while attempting to discredit scientific polls.........


The thing about these polls is they all have several k's voters too (much more than the traditional political polls). Ouch.
______________________________________
over 800,000 for the two big ones. even the smallest sample was over 10,000. compare that to the 800-1,500 poll sample size...
_______________________________________
Oh I did compare Andy. Question is though, did EG and Dtard pick up on that. Me thinks, no.
________________________________________
S'funny. All the media pundits named Hills the winner, yet all the public polls (save CNN) picked trump.
_________________________________________
Greeds response to over a million people saying Trump won... A handful of individual media types and establishment talking heads saying he didn't...
______________________________________________
thats the democrat way. The liberal elitist knows better than us 1000000 hayseeds
__________________________________________________
extragreen said: The big bad bully boy got beat over the head repeatedly by a woman...
30Kelly: What's sad is you actually believe this. LOLZ!
_____________________________________________________
The debate was a little ugly, but like a good football team Trumps basket of deplorables and irredeemables (the teams defense and the majority of people that will be casting a ballot on November 8th) helped him carry the day.
_______________________________________________________
We all knew that the fly by media would predict a Hillary win regardless. 60k attendees in two days and an 18 million dollar single day campaign drive (small donors) after the debate speaks volumes
 
In this election cycle I submit that polls hold little water. The "halo" effect is in full operation. Many people will say one thing in a poll or in a exit poll and vote the exact opposite. Studies have shown when the media hammer a candidate that many people who vote for said candidate will not be forthcoming due to fear of being labeled a racist or bigot. Case in point: I lived in Charlotte back in the day. Incumbent GOP US Senator Jessie Helms lost big in the polls. However on election day he won big over African American liberal Harvey Gant. Reason- The Liberal media pounded away every day that a vote for Helms was a vote for the KKK. Mark it down Trump is ahead. Look at the record crowds. His voting base is energized. Hillary's not so. I live in liberal Athens a bastion of liberalism. I see more Trump signs that Clinton. In the last election it was a sea of Obama signs. I tell ya what matters is getting out the vote. Trump is reaching out to evangelicals many of whom sat out the last election. Numbers I am looking at show an energized voting block. Mark it down Trump is going to win this one.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT