ADVERTISEMENT

round her up & throw her out - dont break up the family send hubby & son too

dherd

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 23, 2007
11,203
556
113
Ah, the irony of politics. Bombastic billionaire Donald Trump owes much of his nomination as Republican presidential candidate to his inflammatory rhetoric against illegal immigrants. Yet he may be married to one. Slovenian-born Melania Knavs Trump is a naturalized citizen and former nude model who came to the United States to pose without her clothing. She arrived in New York in the 1990s (the exact date frequently changes), became a “permanent resident” in 2001 and an American citizen in 2006. Her path to citizenship, however, is as muddled as most of everything that surrounds her flamboyant husband, the man of many lies, exaggerations and unproven claims.

In early August, Trump pledged that his wife, Melania, a native of Slovenia, would hold a news conference explaining how she managed to navigate the onerous process of getting a green card. He made the pledge after a number of outlets raised questions about the timeline of her entry into the country.
The promised news conference, though, hasn't yet happened.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...out-melania-trumps-immigration-status-linger/
 
i've go t news for you - without that $20,000 makup job
she looks like a warthog too. her makeup guy could
make you look like a 10.
 
What kind of makeup hides rolls of fat hanging everywhere? That's what these illegals want to be. Come here and get a check for all the burritos they can eat. Sit around and be fat like everybody else in Section 8 housing.
 
original.jpg


Without makeup, she not a lot of special. JMHO
 
Are you blind? If so, who's reading these posts for you?

Seriously now. If you polled most men who like women and asked them if Trump's wife was ugly how many would think she is ugly. Maybe ugggh one. You.

I know you like to argue about everything and maybe even this. Or, you are queer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
X-ter has been around those East Lynn and Stepptown cupcakes to many years, that's chick power of the highest grade.
 
She looks like she's scowling even when she smiles. She's his imported trophy. We've all got our belongings that we spent a bunch of money on. Have to buy something eventually.

Bill Clinton would definitely take it. Then again, he liked them a little fat. She might be too skinny for him. Hillary's not, but Bill thought she was ugly even before she got old.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walter Brennaneer
Seriously now. If you polled most men who like women and asked them if Trump's wife was ugly how many would think she is ugly. Maybe ugggh one. You.

I know you like to argue about everything and maybe even this. Or, you are queer.

You moron, do you not see a difference between "not a lot of special" and ugly? If you polled sane men and asked them if herdman was smart how many would think herdman is smart? None.

I know you like hanging on trumps gonads, but for goodness sakes take a breather.
 
What kind of makeup hides rolls of fat hanging everywhere? That's what these illegals want to be. Come here and get a check for all the burritos they can eat. Sit around and be fat like everybody else in Section 8 housing.

NO - THATS YOUR JOB
 
Let them have fun, guys. Remember when they all called us retarded for saying Obama wasn't American? This is like the libs being up in arms about us questioning Hillary's health even though they beat unmercifully on McCain in 2008 about the same thing. Difference is that it's 8 years later and McCain is still fine. Hillary won't be alive, or will be completely incompetent (mentally, not morally because she already is) in less than 8 years.
 
YOU'VE BEEN HAD AGAIN.
FROM THE CATO INSTITUTE:

CIS found that immigrants use far more welfare than natives do. CIS’ methodology, parts of which are suspect, is what produced this result – as we’ve pointed out to CIS multipletimes. They also omitted a lot of information that would make for a better comparison between immigrants and natives. Simply put, the CIS study does not compare apples to apples but rather apples to elephants.

http://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use

YOU HAVE TO AGREE WITHOUT THAT $20,000 MAKUP JOB SHE LOOKS LIKE A RUSSIAN
CLEANING WOMAN. TRUMP HAS A THING FOR RUSSIA.
 
YOU'VE BEEN HAD AGAIN.
FROM THE CATO INSTITUTE:

CIS found that immigrants use far more welfare than natives do. CIS’ methodology, parts of which are suspect, is what produced this result – as we’ve pointed out to CIS multipletimes. They also omitted a lot of information that would make for a better comparison between immigrants and natives. Simply put, the CIS study does not compare apples to apples but rather apples to elephants.

http://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use

YOU HAVE TO AGREE WITHOUT THAT $20,000 MAKUP JOB SHE LOOKS LIKE A RUSSIAN
CLEANING WOMAN. TRUMP HAS A THING FOR RUSSIA.

For the bajillionth time moron Liberal, there is a difference between illegals and immigrants...

The article I linked even shows the difference in $ for the two. But the point of the article was not about how much they spend. It was to show that ILLEGALS (different than IMMIGRANTS) do in fact have access to and receive welfare benefits.....

Now how find an article about Trump clearing his throat during a speech and demand medical records...
 
From the link YOU provided:

"Illegal immigrants are barred from directly accessing most (though not all) welfare programs, but they can receive welfare through their U.S.-born children."

The figures provided in YOUR link lump legal and illegal immigrants together but attempt to accomplish what they accomplished in you, which is to deceive you.

That is exactly my point. Fever said they CAN NOT get welfare. That is not correct. They can receive certain welfare benefits regardless of children but can get all once they squirt a kid out on US soil...

And the article shows the difference in legal and illegal benefit further down...
 
From the link YOU provided:

The figures provided in YOUR link lump legal and illegal immigrants together but attempt to accomplish what they accomplished in you, which is to deceive you.


— Illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 (driven largely by the presence of U.S.-born children), while legal immigrant households cost $6,378.
 
That is exactly my point. Fever said they CAN NOT get welfare. That is not correct. They can receive certain welfare benefits regardless of children but can get all once they squirt a kid out on US soil...

You just made Fever a happy camper. His wife is on the way to welfare office. She is being driven by a new graduate of Uber.
 
Households, not illegals.

Estimating Illegal Immigrants. There is a significant body of research showing that illegal immigrants respond to Census Bureau surveys. The Department of Homeland Security uses the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) as the basis for estimating the size of the illegal immigrant population. DHS estimates that 90 percent of the illegal immigrant population is included in the ACS.4 The Pew Hispanic Center uses the Current Population Survey and the ACS to estimate the size of the illegal immigrant population based on the same assumption that about 90 percent of illegal immigrants are included in the survey.5 The Center for Immigration Studies has also used these data sources to estimate the illegal immigrant population.6

Researchers also have estimated the legal status of immigrants in the SIPP and found that it produces estimates of the illegal immigrant population similar to estimates based on other data.7 One advantage of the SIPP over other Census Bureau surveys is that it includes two questions on immigration status. First, non-citizens are asked if they came to the United States as lawful permanent residents (LPRs); and second, it asks those who did not come as LPRs if they have changed their status since they arrived.8 The overwhelming majority of these non-LPRs are likely illegal immigrants.9

There were 2.1 million households headed by non-citizen, non-LPRs in the 2012 SIPP. We estimate there should be a total of 3.4 million households headed by illegal immigrants in the 2012 SIPP.10 In a number of cases, respondents did not provide a response to the migration variables and these values were imputed (filled in) by the Census Bureau using a complex algorithm.11 Our analysis focused on these imputed cases when trying to identify the illegal immigrant population that cannot be identified using the migration variables. To identify those illegal immigrants, we use citizenship status, year of arrival in the United States, age, region of origin, educational attainment, sex, receipt of some welfare programs, and marital status. We use these variables to assign probabilities to each respondent. Those individuals who have a cumulative probability that makes them likely to be illegal immigrants are assigned that status, the remaining non-citizen population as well as naturalized citizens are the legal immigrant population.12
 
I don't track what your point is.
"Undocumented immigrants do not qualify for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, and most other public benefits. Most of these programs require proof of legal immigration status and under the 1996 welfare law, even legal immigrants cannot receive these benefits until they have been in the United States for more than five years."
http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/immigration-myths/
 

Do you know what is meant in this case by MOST? Best I can tell it consists of emergency medical care, and then there are exceptions such as help for refugees and asylum seekers. If you have more date regarding this, I'd like to see it from a credible source.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT