russian propoganda
- Thread starter Chevy1
- Start date
Hopefully, we can all become Americans again. I don't believe anyone wants this thing to fail.
"The Worldwide War on Truth" is worth a watch. If you don't believe that Trump and the republicans fall into the "useful idiots" category for Putin, then it's time to check yourself into drug rehabilitation. As mentioned above, Reagan was the initial warrior.....a truly great president. Interesting stuff.
Racist hasn't been working so back to muh Russia, huh?
What truly sad is u guys don't see how pathetic you are.
What truly sad is u guys don't see how pathetic you are.
It's not about racism...Or any other Woke era BS. But it is a pretty good look at where we've been since the 50s in this information war.
Are you the person who still believes the Russians didn't play a role in the last election? Talk about pathetic.
(sprays with water spritzer) GET DOWN! BAD DOG! BAAAAD DOG! YOU GO SIT ON THE RUG!
No, the issue is we DON'T CARE. Hillary is a cvunt and will always be a cvnt. Do you think the Russians steered me away from her? She was a despicable cvnt before she was ever a presidential candidate.
Any Russian involvement is simply irrelevant to those of us on here, because we never would have even considered her to start with. Why would I care the bitch got told on and light was shed on her awful character? All I ever saw was WikiLeaks, and it wasn't as if the shit wasn't true. Is that what you find so unethical? That her deviant acts were exposed?
@Chevy1 pretty much this. this, and the fact that like you said, it's been going on for years. funny how you mentally deranged cocksuckers all the sudden actually give a shit about it . . . after she lost and you didn't get your way. pathetic.
And there it is. That's a deal killer for me. It's not about Hillary for me.
Having served at a time when we were at war (the cold war) with Russia, there's no splainin' away someone getting election assistance from Russians - or soliciting assistance (be it a joke or otherwise). Can't justify that in my mind. It's not rocket science, anyone who would seek and/or accept assistance from a hostile foreign power puts this country at risk.
And I agree with Trump's longtime supporter and former communications director, Anthony Scaramucci: "Eventually he turns on everyone and soon it will be you and then the entire country,"
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-...scaramucci-says-trump-will-turn-on-americans/
I understand your hatred of Hillary, but you've channeled your support to a man who has zero honor and integrity. If he were a dem, you would think he's more vile than the hated Hillary. BTW, he's never hit 50% job approval rating and lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million. America can't support this guy even during a time of sub 4% unemployment with an economy that's clicking pretty strong.
from RACIST to RUSSIA to POPULAR VOTE! all of your claims are horseshit. well, the popular vote is technically correct, but damn, i'm sure glad we don't have a total of a 3 or 4 counties in the states of cali and NY combined that make the decision for the rest of the nation. this election is a prime example of why our forefathers set up the electoral college. it worked. and you continue to cry about it.
Did Russia interfere in the last presidential election? Yep. Did it have any appreciable impact on the results? Nope. Disagree? Prove (hint: that means true, verifiable evidence, not speculation and political rhetoric) me wrong.
Last edited:
Well.... Don't recall stating there shouldn't be an electoral college.....for the record, I'm for it.
My point being, the majority of Americans aren't too happy with this guy. That's not an opinion.
Below is the latest data:
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/trumps-state-by-state-approval-ratings-should-scare-him.html
Should our President have meetings with, share info with and gladly accept that assistance?
I don't believe this is an issue of proving the significance of Russian involvement. The issue is - why go there?
yore for the EC, but going to use 3 million votes from a few counties to hang yore hat on re: pop vote. hmm, yeah, okay, makes total cents.
It was one piece in info used combination with approval ratings with a recent poll.
My problem with these polls is the fact that they are just a popularity poll on Trump. They do not take into consideration the Democratic candidate. If the Democrats run a moderate to light liberal candidate I think they will win by the landslide in this poll.
But if they pick a far left candidate like a Bernie or honestly the majority of the candidates that are in the Democratic primary I can’t see states like the southern states or rust belt states voting for someone like that. They would carry your deep blue states like Cali, NU, Oregon Washington Massachusetts etc., but I don’t see gun control and free healthcare for illegals etc. being strong running points in the southern and rust belt states.
So I can definitely see this poll being right depending on the candidate the Democrats run.
Last edited:
finally looked at the poll. el. oh. el. texas blue......yeah, that's all i needed to see to realize how much bullshit that's spewing.
texas blue . . . .wish in one hand, shit in the other. voting isn't like this board where someone gets multiple handles, rifle only gets one vote. not saying texas may not eventually go blue, but not at this point in time, not really even close.
The article cited another poll with similar but not identical results. Obviously, a long way to go to the election. However, at this time, both Biden and Sanders would defeat trump in TX per the below:
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2019/08/07/biden-and-sanders-are-beating-trump-in-texas/
As you mentioned, there's lots of speculation about how strong Texas will be for republicans in the future:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/12/texas-republicans-2020-elections-1456161
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/05/mar...t-texas-in-focus-in-2020-house-elections.html
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/13/politics/texas-democrats-districts-gains/index.html
Scaramucci - Republicans might want to consider another candidate.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...2af7d2-bcf4-11e9-b873-63ace636af08_story.html
you libs and yore precious polls. you should all cling to each others poles and rub, maybe they'll get one right.
seriously, my issue with all these polls is where they poll. they tend to poll urban areas and leave out the more rural areas, which is what bit them in the ass in 2016, imo. we may not be as concentrated but we're just as many, albeit spread out, and, apparently, have a louder voice in the polls that matter . . . from an ec standpoint, obvious lee.
edit: and, that's what i see going on with texas. maybe i'm wrong, but makes sense.
Our PresidentI shouldn't. But a candidate for public office? Sure. If a candidate for public office can get dirt on the other guy, you best damn believe they're going to take it, regardless of party. Get off your moral high-horse and take the dossier out of your ass.
Cmon man. Always the fn shot. Guess I could respond with, "I'll get that dossier out of my ass when you retrieve your head out of yours." Thankfully I'm above that nonsense.
No dossier here..... there are plenty of facts and testimony confirming what happened - but you're informed - so I'm sure you know this.
However, it's sad what's happened to the moral high ground. Now someone taking exception with a presidential candidate receiving assistance from hostile foreign power is accused as being some sort of prude. I think that accusation would be more appropriate for those questioning a presidential candidate's use of hush money to cover up sexual liaisons with porn stars or something.
Anyway, if my revulsion of a candidate accepting assistance from a foreign power - especially one at odds with this country makes - me a "prude", then I'll gladly accept that tag.
I suppose that war ended in the mid-80s with the downfall of the Soviet Union. So shit.....you're right. I'm f'n old! Hell, I don't feel that old! Oh well, screw it.....where's the Maker's.
That’s because most people grow out of libiot ideas. Most figure it out after they begin working in real world. Maybe he’s a college professor??
Anyway, if you are not liberal when you are young, you don’t have a heart. If you are liberal when you are old then you don’t have a brain. I believe we have validated that the latter is the case with Chevy
Similar threads
