Oh yes. We'd love to hear more of your worthless drivel.I know I went over this a couple of years ago with you deplorables. Do you need to read the entire Anthem again to understand why blacks, as well as any non-deplorable, shouldn’t support it?
Go ahead. Are they claiming not to be Americans or what?I know I went over this a couple of years ago with you deplorables. Do you need to read the entire Anthem again to understand why blacks, as well as any non-deplorable, shouldn’t support it?
I must be very white because I do not know what you are talking about.
fighting for their freedom? they were fighting for the king.Read the full Anthem. A verse very specifically celebrates the killing of black slaves who are fighting for their freedom. It was written by a slave owner whose brother-in-law was the DA in DC and was vehement about blacks being subhuman and prosecuting those who believe otherwise.
So let me reiterate: we are faulting blacks for not honoring a song that very specifically celebrates the killing of black slaves who were fighting for their freedom, written by a slave owner whose own family was a huge factor in subhumanizing blacks.
Why the fvck would a bunch of slaves fight for a king they had no allegiance to? They were fighting for their freedom, as that is what they were promised if they were victorious.fighting for their freedom? they were fighting for the king.
Hahaaaa. You guys are really are something else.Why the fvck would a bunch of slaves fight for a king they had no allegiance to? They were fighting for their freedom, as that is what they were promised if they were victorious.
You're an idiot.Hahaaaa. You guys are really are something else.
You live in planet lollapalooza land
Hahaaaa. You guys are really are something else.
You live in planet lollapalooza land
They were fighting for the Crown of England, the enemy.Let’s look at how foolish and hypocritical you are.
Robert E Lee was an enemy of the U.S. government and fought against the U.S. But according to you, he is an American hero and schools are fine to be named after him because he was fighting for his livelihood.
Black slaves who fought for the crown were fighting against the future U.S. government in order to gain freedom. But according to you, they should not only have schools not named after them, but we should a song celebrating their deaths.
How do you support one guy who was fighting against the U.S. because the government may hurt his wallet while faulting a guy for fighting against the future U.S. government in order to gain freedom? Doh!
They were fighting for the Crown of England, the enemy.
That's pretty easy to figure out, rifle. Your argument makes no sense.
Yehhh, no shit and we don't play homage to Robert E Lee before the Cowboys vs Giants game either.In other words, they were fighting for the enemy of the U.S. government.
Likewise, Robert E Lee was fighting for the enemy of the U.S. government.
In that case, then why do you cry when we take down monumnents and rename schools of Stonewall Jackson and Lee? They were fighting against the U.S. government, so how come you cry when we try to stop honoring them?Yehhh, no shit and we don't play homage to Robert E Lee before the Cowboys vs Giants game either.
the anthem mentions some specific blacks in the other verses because they were fighting for the King, the enemy. The mention Red Coats too. Does't mean the country hates blacks
Were you and some these people screaming hoping Great Britain won the war? ahhahaaa
I don't give a shit about them anymore. Do want you want. However, it is just white lib rage and doesn't do a damn thing to help blacks. That shit does nothing but just is lip service to nothing.In that case, then why do you cry when we take down monumnents and rename schools of Stonewall Jackson and Lee? They were fighting against the U.S. government, so how come you cry when we try to stop honoring them?
Hypocrite. That’s all there is to it.
I don't give a shit about them anymore. Do want you want. However, it is just white lib rage and doesn't do a damn thing to help blacks. That shit does nothing but just is lip service to nothing.
That being said, there is ONE national anthem. There is no black nation.
You are saying your were rooting for the British and blacks were rooting for the BritishNo, no, fvcking no. That isn’t how it works.
You can’t cry about one thing, then when the exact same thing happens but it’s against your political stance, you can’t suddenly claim you don’t care about the first issue anymore.
You’re a fvcking hypocrite. Own it.
^^^^trumptard is too stupid to understand he's talking about the conservative's past....and present.The democrats are desperate to tear down these statues to try and erase the dems racist past.
Hiding the history of the Democrat Party. You ever hear of Robert Byrd? Hell, have you heard some of the stuff Biden has said?^^^^trumptard is too stupid to understand he's talking about the conservative's past....and present.
Bingo and they want to continue to divide over race. It is their major platform.The democrats are desperate to tear down these statues to try and erase the dems racist past.
Jefferson Finis Davis (June 3, 1808 – December 6, 1889) was an American politician who served as the president of the Confederate States from 1861 to 1865. As a member of the Democratic Party, he represented Mississippi in the United States Senate and the House of Representatives before the American Civil War.Hiding the history of the Democrat Party. You ever hear of Robert Byrd? Hell, have you heard some of the stuff Biden has said?
You're an idiot^^^^trumptard is too stupid to understand he's talking about the conservative's past....and present.
These Republicans are the guys who are claiming that it is the Dems who are racist?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You're attempting to change history. Won't work with me oath breaker. Conservatives by a different name are still racist conservatives. Idiot.Hiding the history of the Democrat Party. You ever hear of Robert Byrd? Hell, have you heard some of the stuff Biden has said?
Well are you saying all conservatizes are racist? You do know liberals can be racist as well, don't you? You are attempting to hide the history of the Democrat Party. It is their history. Like it or not.You're attempting to change history. Won't work with me oath breaker. Conservatives by a different name are still racist conservatives. Idiot.
I don't have to hide the history of the democrat party, as they used to be the conservative party. Conservatives are known for their racism and bigotry. Oath breaker.Well are you saying all conservatizes are racist? You do know liberals can be racist as well, don't you? You are attempting to hide the history of the Democrat Party. It is their history. Like it or not.
Look at their current history and their past history. Now what are they? Biggest racists on the planet(they don't want blacks or others to do better, they want them to stay down). They continuously tell them how bad they have it and they can't think for themelves and can't make copies of an ID. Don't even know how to vote. They are the party of left wing socialists and Marxist.I don't have to hide the history of the democrat party, as they used to be the conservative party. Conservatives are known for their racism and bigotry. Oath breaker.
You'll have to sell that malarkey to someone that's stupid. I'm not in the market for it. Oath breaker.Look at their current history and their past history. Now what are they? Biggest racists on the planet(they don't want blacks or others to do better, they want them to stay down). They continuously tell them how bad they have it and they can't think for themelves and can't make copies of an ID. Don't even know how to vote. They are the party of left wing socialists and Marxist.
hate to tell you this but the Democrats are the party of elite big tech power brokers and Wall Street.
The Dems have a screwed up history.
Context is not a friend to liberal ideologues.
Glad I was able to give rifle a history lesson. But here it is again.Context is not a friend to liberal ideologues.
Even a habitual liar like you couldn’t read that link and conclude that the guy formed logical and reasonable arguments.Context is not a friend to liberal ideologues.
Uhh, that’s not the argument. Why is critical thinking and reading so difficult for you deplorables?Glad I was able to give rifle a history lesson. But here it is again.
“The Star-Spangled Banner” in no way glorifies or celebrates slavery.
that is what you were arguing.Uhh, that’s not the argument. Why is critical thinking and reading so difficult for you deplorables?