Go ahead and skip to the 2:30 mark so you can avoid the blowhard. Don’t worry, you’ll still get two more “bigly” comments:
She Told Us
- Thread starter C.K. Ocsevol-Evad
- Start date
Impressive. I'm guessing she won by a landslide, right?
Apparently you are as dumb as 1988.
During the presidential debate, Donald Trump used the word “bigly” several times, and many sitting at home took notice.
“Believe me.” “You know it. I know it.”
Somebody doesn’t know the definition of “clearly.” Does he say “big league” in this particular video? Yes. Is it easily distinguishable from “bigly”? No. In no way could a reasonable person say it is “clearly.”
You’re clearly one of the deplorables who cheeto was making fun of when he said you wouldn’t be bothered if he shot somebody on fifth ave.
It is clear. The man says “big league.” It’s obvious every single time. All you have to do is have working ears and an understanding of the English language. You’re simply trying to turn it into something it’s not.
It really doesn't matter what TRUMP says, the far left crowd always hears something completely different.
True - our system discounts votes from certain parts of the country, but everyone accepted the results - Hillary immediately conceded. Transfer of power was as it should be.
However, that still doesn't change the fact more Americans voted against Trump than voted for him - and believe me....they voted against Trump - not for Hillary. But I suppose we can go on about that great electoral college victory.
oh yes transfer of power as it should be...………….FISA abuse, spying and fraudulent investigations. that's how it "should be" jesus Christ some of you are toast.
and you want NY and CA to elect your president? how hard is it to understand the electoral college. leftist are morons.
sure she did....
https://www.investors.com/politics/...n-live-adults-a-red-flag-for-electoral-fraud/
California, for instance, has 11 counties with more registered voters than actual voters. Perhaps not surprisingly — it is deep-Blue State California, after all — 10 of those counties voted heavily for Hillary Clinton.
Los Angeles County, whose more than 10 million people make it the nation's most populous county, had 12% more registered voters than live ones, some 707,475 votes. That's a huge number of possible votes in an election.I am sure that all is well and we shouldn't be concerned ....
Trump's blue ribbon panel on voter fraud came up empty and was disbanded.
Snopes has some comments about the conclusions in the article you linked - some supportive....however, many of the article's conclusions were debunked.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/us-more-registered-voters-than-adult
Snopes has some comments about the conclusions in the article you linked - some supportive....however, many of the article's conclusions were debunked.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/us-more-registered-voters-than-adult
you do realize that Snopes is a joke? Sorry Charlie, Snopes has been debunked- try again.
Here is another:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017...oters-outnumber-eligible-voters-462-counties/
Why did the voter fraud committee headed by pence come up empty handed and fold.
Saw/read the national review article when pulling the snopes data. BTW, they agreed with the numbers cited in the article....but not the conclusions based on the data.
However, the indisputable fact remains Trump appointed a council to look into voter fraud, and it was finally disbanded. They found nothing.
Last edited:
And if it was a straight popular vote then it would discount votes from more of the country. The system in place now is the fairest way to elect a president and have people’s vote mean something outside of nyc la and chicago
This isn't the same country it was back in 1787. Lifestyles and technologies have changed. There's no longer the city worker vs. the farmer like there was when the current system was established.
See value in the system...but believe it needs to be revised.
There is nothing “clear” about it. That’s why so many people from both sides weren’t quite sure what he was saying the first few times he did it live.
Now, after closely listening many times, you can distinguish “big league” in some of the uses. But that is definitely not “clearly” when it takes people numerous listen to hear it. His use of it is also at awkward times where the phrase isn’t normally used which makes it even more confusing.
Looking forward to the preacher once again claiming that he doesn’t always defend cheeto and fault Democrats.
Explain how Snopes is a joke and has been discredited. They do a very, very good job at investigating and finding truthful conclusions.
Is your comment based on the fact that one of their researchers, in her private life, supports Democrats? If so, that’s extrneley illogical.
I get confused because your wife tells me that I have an extremely nice cock, so I mesh “extremely” and “nice” together.
Similar threads
