ADVERTISEMENT

SIAP; Ohio Train Derailment

Jbabbington

Gold Buffalo
Gold Member
Jan 4, 2018
4,998
6,409
113
Not sure if many have been following this, but I thought I would bring it over for discussion.

Not much reporting being done on it, when there definitely should be.

The Vinvyl Chloride has already gotten into the Ohio River up in Weirton and we're downstream of it.

The Ohio River feeds 5 million people.

WV American Water stated that as of today there have been no changes in the raw water, but a second intake is currently being installed in the Guyandotte for us to switch over to if need be.
b537b818-2e7e-49a9-9787-acae53e0ff51-jumbo16x9_smoke.JPG
 
Not sure if many have been following this, but I thought I would bring it over for discussion.

Not much reporting being done on it, when there definitely should be.

The Vinvyl Chloride has already gotten into the Ohio River up in Weirton and we're downstream of it.

The Ohio River feeds 5 million people.

WV American Water stated that as of today there have been no changes in the raw water, but a second intake is currently being installed in the Guyandotte for us to switch over to if need be.
b537b818-2e7e-49a9-9787-acae53e0ff51-jumbo16x9_smoke.JPG
How did it get into the Ohio River?
 
VC is extremely challenging to remediate once it’s in the ground/groundwater. If they could have dug it up right away it would have helped but obviously with a raging fire that was basically impossible. Probably so Bio Amendment injections, groundwater monitoring wells with long term monitoring along with seep sampling at the Ohio will be warranted for quite a few years. @Jbabbington would you think that seems reasonable as well?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jbabbington
VC is extremely challenging to remediate once it’s in the ground/groundwater. If they could have dug it up right away it would have helped but obviously with a raging fire that was basically impossible. Probably so Bio Amendment injections, groundwater monitoring wells with long term monitoring along with seep sampling at the Ohio will be warranted for quite a few years. @Jbabbington would you think that seems reasonable as well?
Agreed. I'm not a chemist so correct me if I'm wrong, but it having entered the watershed and it's ability to bond with water, it's going to be one hell of a remediation process.

This is going to have some pretty big ramifications, unfortunately we won't truly know what those are for probably another decade. This could go down as one of the biggest environmental catastrophes in our history if they don't get a grip on this fast, and barely anyone is talking about it.

I believe that they have already started temp. Damming parts of the Ohio River way upstream of us to better get an understanding of the contamination.

The sad thing is it was 100% preventable in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GeauxHerd
Agreed. I'm not a chemist so correct me if I'm wrong, but it having entered the watershed and it's ability to bond with water, it's going to be one hell of a remediation process.

This is going to have some pretty big ramifications, unfortunately we won't truly know what those are for probably another decade. This could go down as one of the biggest environmental catastrophes in our history if they don't get a grip on this fast, and barely anyone is talking about it.

I believe that they have already started temp. Damming parts of the Ohio River way upstream of us to better get an understanding of the contamination.

The sad thing is it was 100% preventable in my opinion.
It’s also a NAPL so it will just keep going into the water column so yes, spot on. The other bad thing is even if towns arent directly using the Ohio, they use the aquifer adjacent and VC can impact that and it has a very low risk value in the PPBs so very easy to exceed. Probably a high likelihood those municipalities will have to add air strippers to their water treatment regimen as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jbabbington
It’s also a NAPL so it will just keep going into the water column so yes, spot on. The other bad thing is even if towns arent directly using the Ohio, they use the aquifer adjacent and VC can impact that and it has a very low risk value in the PPBs so very easy to exceed. Probably a high likelihood those municipalities will have to add air strippers to their water treatment regimen as well.
Just read that along with VC, Isobutylene, Ethylhexyl Acrylate, and Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether were also burned off in that plume.

The Ohio is bad enough, but if this hits the Mississippi - oh boy. Get ready for a spike in cancer among the water basins in 20 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeauxHerd
Just read that along with VC, Isobutylene, Ethylhexyl Acrylate, and Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether were also burned off in that plume.

The Ohio is bad enough, but if this hits the Mississippi - oh boy. Get ready for a spike in cancer among the water basins in 20 years.
It should be diluted out before that. Burning it off is the best thing they could do and move people out of the area while it was burning
as long as my spring in BFEWV isn't affected, ZFG.
You already live in BFEWV….. YOLO Periodt.
 
It should be diluted out before that. Burning it off is the best thing they could do and move people out of the area while it was burning

You already live in BFEWV….. YOLO Periodt.
The VC or the other three?

Edit: Just realized you're talking about it reaching the Mississippi, yeah I would agree - that's a long shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeauxHerd
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT