We Play for Championships. If that isn't the case or possible then
@The Real SamC is correct in saying we only sponsor basketball because we have to.
That is the decision we have to make.
I was slammed for this, but the fact is that in the most recent version of CUSA, the level of ability and commitment to MBB by MOST of the schools is very low. Many simply do not try. Many simply can not. Look at the HS gym type arenas and the handful of randos, girlfriends, and otherwise EMPTY SEATS. No, CUSA was a group of schools together to TRY (ultimately the experiment failed, that is an irrelevancy) to play football at the same level, dragging MBB (and everything else) programs at vastly different levels. Vastly different levels of commitment and just plain old interest in MBB. Many simply had no fans, no interest, and no commitment.
Now, substitute the new SBC for CUSA, and its really not that different. Average 15 seed. This year's champion is brackeetologyied to be a 16. Last. The new schools improve the league, but it is the same thing. These are schools that wish to play FOOTBALL at a certain level. Everything else is brought along.
Now look at MU. Now, the whole nostalgia for this great past that is a big part of the DD act is, of course, false. It never actually happened. But MU has put up representative and competitive MBB for a long time. The old MFH was, what, the 11th largest arena in the Midwest when built? And we sold it out. The HC, for all its Rockefailure caused shortcomings and issues, is a solid just short of 10K arena with multiple fixes and upgrades (and is available full time to the two teams, no PF needed).
Even with our poor team, we draw OK. We sell merch. We have media coverage (Challenge: go on line and look at the local newspapers, radio or TV news from many of our conference mates, old or new, and see if the MBB there is even mentioned). We have fans. We do. We, if we put a proper team on the floor, could easily grab not just local, but statewide attention, and easily draw 8K every time. We have potential. And, bluntly, a lot of our conference mates, old and new, could go 24-4 and still draw randos and girlfriends and what time do the (Tar Heals/Gamecocks/Tide/Longhorns/Rebels/Etc.) play on TV?
So we have a choice. Do we try, given all we have going for us? Or do we admit that we won't spend the resources to win even at the s*** level we are at? Is this a token effort, which we are doing just because we have to, or do we understand that we should WIN the SBC at least every 4th year and that 4th in the league is a bad finish. There to be grabbed by the throat and controlled.
I say have some pride and go for it.
- Fire DD
- Fire his staff
- Paint over all this throwback false nostalgia crap, burn the uniforms
- Run off as many of his players as possible
- Get a hot young coach
- Spend some $$ on travel (which is better in the SBC) and etc.
Win.