There have already been some massive Trump like temper trantrums. And as you would expect an FBI agent to be he is as cool as a cucumber.
Strzok is making congress look like a bunch of goofs.
- Thread starter HerdBuckeye
- Start date
Congress, what a bunch of embeciles. That was embarrassing. They couldn’t have made themselves look more like idiots if they tried.
“I’m a dentist and I know how to read body language.”
Then he went on to try to explain a Constitutional Republic and tripped over himself, forgot what he was saying and couldn’t remember words and talked about the Electoral College.
LMAO!
“I’m a dentist and I know how to read body language.”
Then he went on to try to explain a Constitutional Republic and tripped over himself, forgot what he was saying and couldn’t remember words and talked about the Electoral College.
LMAO!
Yeah, questions concerning an ongoing investigation. Jesus Christ, they know he can't answer shit like that, but they also know imbeciles like you will fall for their act and go all derp for it.
Good Lord, you know he's a lying POS, but yet you're defending him?
The proof is in the pudding. No matter who says what about this guy - and what he did was bonehead stupid - the fact remains the Russia investigation didn't see the light of day until AFTER the election. Unlike the emails on Weiner's computer
Last edited:
Congress wanted me to tell you not to insult their intelligence if you can't correctly spell the insult.
That was the funniest thing I have seen. I am a dentist.... jesus what an idiot. Then he couldn’t remember what the electoral college was called. A true embarrassment.
I'm defending an employee of the FBI refusing to answer questions about an ongoing federal criminal and counter-intelligence investigation, yes. How the fvck you think that works that is different from reality?
Yep. As he said, if he wanted to hurt Trump he could have leaked details of the investigation. Which, you know, Republicans demanded he do yesterday.
You're defending the POS because you're a NEVER TRUMPER. Face it, it's a witch hunt, and was investigated by an extremely biased, adultery committing liar. In other words, a made-up investigation. What about the Clinton investigation? Dude was working both sides of the fence. What a douche bag tool.
No, I'd defend any law enforcement officer not commenting on an ongoing investigation. I'd also defend any intelligence officer if they told you you are too stupid to handle the truth about much of anything.
Tell me, if the FBI was playing both sides, why was details of the Clinton investigation leaked and not details of the Trump investigation? Seriously. Explain it, and bother to try to make sense.
There's been an awful lot of indictments for a made-up investigation.
It's a hoot reading any Trump supporter talk adultery.
And let's be real about being a Trump supporter: it's kind of like being proud that you fvcked your own sister. You know it's crazy and fvcked up, but you let your inner Neanderthal win and you don't care.
Clinton didn't nothing wrong---I read it here several times.
Strzok is a liar plain and simple. Liberals known as being fact checkers---only when those facts fit their narrative. If they rolled around in cow shit and went in a room and someone called them on smelling like cow mature. They would deny it, even if on a video and everyone in the room said they smelled cow turdish. Similar to when they denied never voting for Sanders or Clinton after election results came in. I know which clowns on this board pretend. Same few who push their intellect and use name calling as their defense of their lies.
Clinton is a cvnt. I'm pretty sure I've said that here a million times.
But I would think if she did something criminal, your best and brightest Senators would have figured it out over how many years of hearings?
Strzok was the one involved simultaneously with both investigations. Wish I could answer your question, but unfortunately, Strzok wouldn't answer it himself yesterday. Strzok and bucky (his lover) were both trying their darndest to derail TRUMP. That much is widely known, despite him being a liar and not being man enough to admit it. I bet the lovers were butt hurt over that defeat though, so in a way, justice was served.
Law enforcement officers are not required to have no bias. I'm pretty sure Eliot Ness thought Al Capone was a real cocksucker.
If it is a fact he was "going to do" something, why didn't he do it? Same challenge I gave our Michigan white trasher* : explain why Hillary stuff was leaked and then acknowledged, but nothing on Trump was leaked, and actually try to make sense about it.
*after Ted Nugent, Kid Rock, Eminem, and ICP, I assume all white people from Michigan are white trash.
You can't answer it because what you believe makes zero sense.
I clearly remember thinking, "Damn, the FBI is fvcking Hillary".
No, you're unable to put 2 & 2 together, due to your NEVER TRUMPER agenda.
The rogue FBI agent sat on this shit, and did nothing with it, claiming he was too busy or some sort of bullshit. Comey found out about it, and that's when he went back to the podium to announce that additional things have come to light.
He’s certainly allowed to have his own personal opinions, but he should never allow that to play over into his professional role, which his texts indicate that he was doing. He was over the Hillary investigation and Trump’s, so how do you know that he didn’t have a part in creating the collusion myth in the first place? His own words are sinking him. “We’ll stop it.” How? By creating a fake Russia investigation and claiming Trump did things that he clearly didn’t do? Who knows?
How can anybody claim this is made up considering the number of those accused who have agreed to cooperate against others and/or the number of indictments already handed down?
Are all of those things fabricated, also?
Are all of those things fabricated, also?
Do you realize that what you're intending to say and what you're actually saying are completely opposite?
In the first one, you're using a double-negative which makes your attempt opposite of your intention. In the second one, it should be "denied ever." If "denied never," it means the opposite.
Nobody is pushing their intellect, but it just seems that way because everyone is far more advanced than you.
The IG's report says you are full of shit. And again, it makes zero sense. Your camp claims Comey is crooked, was for Hillary, and out to get Trump...then why did he announce the Hillary stuff? Make up your mind: is Comey a crook, or is he now the knight in shining armor outing this dirty Polock?
I don't have an agenda. I mean, I would like to see dumb people sterilized, so you might have to lose your nutsack if I become king, but I have no agenda I can implement.
I would think the same way all of you said you would personally stop Obama. By simply voting and running your mouths. Didn't work, did it? Sounds a lot like this FBI guy.
You pack so much dumb shit in each post, I sometimes overlook things. Do you mean the thing so mythical that Trump himself had to draft a statement for his son to use to deny it?
For reference, I consider myself a fiscal conservative and mostly a social libertarian.
Well even if he did not have bias against President Trump, and I am unsure of that, sending those texts that certainly showed a potential of bias was not very smart. Especially since they were on a government phone.
One other point, how could he remember the context of an email that he did not even remember sending. That, to me, is not very believable.
Also, do I think these hearings and interviews are politically motivated - YES. Almost all of these type of hearings have been politically motivated for decades regardless of whether they are run by the Dems or Reps. Anyone who believes different is an idiot.
Well even if he did not have bias against President Trump, and I am unsure of that, sending those texts that certainly showed a potential of bias was not very smart. Especially since they were on a government phone.
One other point, how could he remember the context of an email that he did not even remember sending. That, to me, is not very believable.
Also, do I think these hearings and interviews are politically motivated - YES. Almost all of these type of hearings have been politically motivated for decades regardless of whether they are run by the Dems or Reps. Anyone who believes different is an idiot.
The thing so mythical that almost 2 years worth of an investigation has turned up jack.
32 people indicted and 5 convictions....so far.
WTF is wrong with you? It’s as if you are cheering for Russia.
An investigation that took two years and turned up jack?
I feel like I'm having déjà vu.
