ADVERTISEMENT

The best part about GHWB

...and Barbara wanted that Space Mountian ride.

Rick Rubin, President Bush, Bill Simmons, John Stewart, Big Country....just a list of the luminaries that are fans....
 
  • Like
Reactions: big_country90
Imagine if Ross Perot hadn't run. Bush would have most definitely beat Clinton, and we would have never had him nor his cvnt wife Hillary.

Imagine

Imagine if you had any type of intelligence. I wouldn't have to constantly correct your posts.

Exit polls show that those who voted for Perot were almost exactly split between Clinton and Bush of who they would have voted for second.
 
Imagine if you had any type of intelligence. I wouldn't have to constantly correct your posts.

Exit polls show that those who voted for Perot were almost exactly split between Clinton and Bush of who they would have voted for second.
can you provide that evidence? And, the breakdown of the election. I am not going to waste time looking it up considering it was over 25 years ago. I always heard Perot cost him the election.
 
Bcsd7q.gif
 
I said I wasn't going to look it up. I said it was more than 25 years ago. Why do you even care. It was a thread about Ric Flair and Bush.

It is because you and your pal Greed(who is the same way) like to argue about every single thing.

Which one of your articles take into account the electoral college? I am not reading all that crap.

Remember old bag HC got more votes and lost.

Who cares anyway. We could have had a good thread and you two ruin it again.
 
Last edited:
I said I wasn't going to look it up.

You don't have to. Each of the links I provided shows what you asked me: can I provide evidence of my claim that voters for Perot were basically split between Clinton and Bush as their second choice.

Those articles discuss which states had voters lean a certain way as a second pick which may have flopped the electoral vote for that particular state. In no way would there have been enough of a flip to allow Bush to win.

Why ask for evidence, get it, then get mad when it's presented to you?


We could have had a good thread and you two ruin it again.

At which point was the thread trending in a good direction? Was it when grown men were about to start discussing fake wrasslin' or when the last post before mine was a Migos video?
 
You don't have to. Each of the links I provided shows what you asked me: can I provide evidence of my claim that voters for Perot were basically split between Clinton and Bush as their second choice.

Those articles discuss which states had voters lean a certain way as a second pick which may have flopped the electoral vote for that particular state. In no way would there have been enough of a flip to allow Bush to win.

Why ask for evidence, get it, then get mad when it's presented to you?




At which point was the thread trending in a good direction? Was it when grown men were about to start discussing fake wrasslin' or when the last post before mine was a Migos video?
The original post had it trending in the right direction.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT