Was that he was a Ric Flair mark.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...cretly-a-pro-wrestling-fan-va-secretary-says/
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...cretly-a-pro-wrestling-fan-va-secretary-says/
The best part about Bush was that he didn't get reelected.
Imagine if Ross Perot hadn't run. Bush would have most definitely beat Clinton, and we would have never had him nor his cvnt wife Hillary.
Imagine
can you provide that evidence? And, the breakdown of the election. I am not going to waste time looking it up considering it was over 25 years ago. I always heard Perot cost him the election.Imagine if you had any type of intelligence. I wouldn't have to constantly correct your posts.
Exit polls show that those who voted for Perot were almost exactly split between Clinton and Bush of who they would have voted for second.
can you provide that evidence? And, the breakdown of the election. I am not going to waste time looking it up considering it was over 25 years ago. I always heard Perot cost him the election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...f4f-8e7f-f3ee9f2325d1/?utm_term=.21e996de72df
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ross-perot-myth-reborn-amid-rumors-third-party-trump-candidacy
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/05/...sis-eccentric-but-no-joke-perot-s-strong.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...licans_shouldnt_fear_a_third-party_trump.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-ross-perot-myth/
When are you going to stop doubting me? It's been 17 years. You should have learned by now.
I said I wasn't going to look it up. I said it was more than 25 years ago. Why do you even care. It was a thread about Ric Flair and Bush.https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...f4f-8e7f-f3ee9f2325d1/?utm_term=.21e996de72df
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ross-perot-myth-reborn-amid-rumors-third-party-trump-candidacy
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/05/...sis-eccentric-but-no-joke-perot-s-strong.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...licans_shouldnt_fear_a_third-party_trump.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-ross-perot-myth/
When are you going to stop doubting me? It's been 17 years. You should have learned by now.
I said I wasn't going to look it up.
We could have had a good thread and you two ruin it again.
The original post had it trending in the right direction.You don't have to. Each of the links I provided shows what you asked me: can I provide evidence of my claim that voters for Perot were basically split between Clinton and Bush as their second choice.
Those articles discuss which states had voters lean a certain way as a second pick which may have flopped the electoral vote for that particular state. In no way would there have been enough of a flip to allow Bush to win.
Why ask for evidence, get it, then get mad when it's presented to you?
At which point was the thread trending in a good direction? Was it when grown men were about to start discussing fake wrasslin' or when the last post before mine was a Migos video?
Who cares anyway. We could have had a good thread and you two ruin it again.