The point is pretty simple, the best athletes in the US play 2 sports upon which there is a maximum of 2 medals they can be awarded.
Comparing per capital medal count is absurd unless you control for that.
Norway can earn up to 39 medals in Alpine skiing, the US can earn up to two for basketball.
In that case, your point has absolutely nothing to fvcking do with the topic.
Norway is kicking our ass in the Olympics while having implemented a youth sports philosophy that the Green Berets on this board often vehemently rail against.
There has been no mention of who has the more athletic citizens. Nobody is claiming that Jan Bjorn Johansen is more athletic than Malik Blackman.
Now, your claim about per capita is illogical. Why? Well, the per capita medal count topic only applied to the summer games. No per capita is needed in the winter games, as they - a country with 1/60th of our population - are kicking our ass straight up.
For the per capita argument, you claimed that the U.S. can only win two medals for basketball while Norway can win a lot more for Alpine Skiing. Those events are not in the same games. Those are summer versus winter. There is no per capita needed in the winter games. Now, if you had selected a summer games event which had a widely lopsided medal count, then you'd have a point we could discuss. But you didn't, and as a result, your argument makes no sense.
Norway is kicking our ass straight up in the winter games. Our best athletes have just as much of a chance to win the same medals as their best athletes in these games.
Norway, per capita, did better than us in the summer games.