ADVERTISEMENT

TRUMP CAN SHUT DOWN OUT OF CONTROL MUELLER AND SHOULD

SamSwimmer

Platinum Buffalo
Aug 16, 2015
6,064
4,687
113
And not a single sane person in this country would blame him. The insane folks would, but they're clearly insane anyways.
 
I would love it. Just to see Chucky and the Media (sounds like a boy band) go bat shit crazy in front of the camera!
 
Shut him down, why he hired him???
THEN IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP SANITY IN GOVERNMENT. YOU'RE WELCOME THAT SOME OF US STILL WANT TO UPHOLD THE INTERGRITY OF THE FBI, EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT'S IN YOUR OWN BEST INTEREST. FIRE MUELLER NOW.
 
THEN IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP SANITY IN GOVERNMENT. YOU'RE WELCOME THAT SOME OF US STILL WANT TO UPHOLD THE INTERGRITY OF THE FBI, EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT'S IN YOUR OWN BEST INTEREST. FIRE MUELLER NOW.
Good story. You realize that Mueller is not FBI right??
 
THEN IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP SANITY IN GOVERNMENT. YOU'RE WELCOME THAT SOME OF US STILL WANT TO UPHOLD THE INTERGRITY OF THE FBI, EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT'S IN YOUR OWN BEST INTEREST. FIRE MUELLER NOW.

3b75813af2350e14a3403e46e8539c3cb2f8d44e36b0a0ff450203ef80b42b2c.jpg
 
why would trump want to fire Mueller?
trump has said a thousand times there was no collusion with Russia.
so I am certain he welcomes Mueller's exoneration.
what are you all so worried about - from what you all say
there is nothing to worry about.
 
Was he hired to find decade old crimes that are unrelated to Trump candidacy/presidency?
Yep and if Hillary is found guilty of colluding or another crime that hits the radar she will be indicted too. You should be very happy since the libtards have everything to worry about and Donald is clean as a whistle.
 
the Clintons have been investigated by republicans literally for 25 yrs.
not even a hint of anything wrong.
 
It’s hard for them to imagine there are multiple people that think trump is an incompetent POS.[/QUOTE said:
they live in a tiny little echo chamber that is impervious to truth. they are bombarded
all day long with faux news Limbaugh Hannity breitbart infowars etc who tell them
anything not heard from one of them is bogus.
but this is an apple not a banana
 
Isn't a special prosecutor required to charge with any crime they uncover?

It is my understanding that most special prosecutors historically have been given very focused parameters for investigating a specific case. This is the problem I have with this specific situation overall, regardless if it ensnares Democrats (from a decade ago occurrence).

It's why I've said Dems better be careful what they were championing here. Their own desire for a Trump political witch hunt could end up snagging them. I find the whole "special prosecutor" designation and power granted to be troubling.

Scalia's dissent regarding special prosecutors said it best:

“Nothing is so politically effective as the ability to charge that one’s opponent and his associates are not merely wrongheaded, naive, ineffective, but, in all probability, ‘crooks,’” Scalia warned. “And nothing so effectively gives an appearance of validity to such charges as a Justice Department investigation and, even better, prosecution. The present statute provides ample means for that sort of attack, assuring that massive and lengthy investigations will occur, not merely when the Justice Department in the application of its usual standards believes they are called for, but whenever it cannot be said that there are ‘no reasonable grounds to believe’ they are called for.”
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT