Trump Enjoys Golden Showers and Other Leaked Material
- Thread starter wvkeeper(HN)
- Start date
Buzzfeed? CNN? "made up" intelligence officer issuing "reports" with incorrect information? Russians? Hillary still a loser...
All that really needs to be said???
All that really needs to be said???
I hope this is true, it fits my working theory that the global elite are a bunch of sexual perverts.
Why would Donald Trump do that?
Answer: Because he can.
Nah man. It's Satanic sex and drug orgies, anything goes including pedophilia. Bill Clinton is in on it, too. Illuminati shit. Remember what Nixon said about Bohemian Grove?
Let's have some real fun with the conspiracies.
I have read that this dossier was prepared by an ex-SIS (that's MI6 to you Bond fans) agent first hired by the "Never Trump" Republicans. Now which of that gang has access to such assets? JEB. The Bush family is all spooked-up. If it is true the Bushes were digging up real dirt, that gives this a 50/50 chance of being legit. Shit might be getting deep. Hell, the Bushes and the CIA might shoot Trump, like they did JFK.
I have read that this dossier was prepared by an ex-SIS (that's MI6 to you Bond fans) agent first hired by the "Never Trump" Republicans. Now which of that gang has access to such assets? JEB. The Bush family is all spooked-up. If it is true the Bushes were digging up real dirt, that gives this a 50/50 chance of being legit. Shit might be getting deep. Hell, the Bushes and the CIA might shoot Trump, like they did JFK.
one thing seems odd. it states that "the hotel was known to be under FSB control with microphones and concealed cameras..."
Trump allegedly stayed here because the Obama's stayed here and wanted to blow his load all over the same bed. so the POTUS stayed in a hotel that was known to have microphones, cameras, and be under FSB control?
Trump allegedly stayed here because the Obama's stayed here and wanted to blow his load all over the same bed. so the POTUS stayed in a hotel that was known to have microphones, cameras, and be under FSB control?
Well, if Obama was game it would be good fun to talk all kinds of crazy shit for the spooks lol.
"As we noted in our story, there is a serious reason to doubt the allegations,"
"We have been chasing specific claims in this document for weeks, and will continue to."
Ben Smith, BuzzFeed's editor-in-chief
"We have been chasing specific claims in this document for weeks, and will continue to."
Ben Smith, BuzzFeed's editor-in-chief
Julia Ioffe, a journalist who left Politico after suggesting in a tweet that Trump might be having sex with his own daughter, tweeted Tuesday that she had been approached with the story that BuzzFeed ran with but declined to publish. "Because it was impossible to verify. (I tried.)"
this might be the final nail in the CNN coffin...
"Not how journalism works: Here's a thing that might or might not be true, without supporting evidence; decide for yourself if it's legit."
-Brad Heath USA Today
"Sequence of events: @CNN finds way to talk about report and @buzzfeed uses that as reason to publish. Media critics are gonna be busy."
-Adam Goldman NYT
"Not how journalism works: Here's a thing that might or might not be true, without supporting evidence; decide for yourself if it's legit."
-Brad Heath USA Today
"Sequence of events: @CNN finds way to talk about report and @buzzfeed uses that as reason to publish. Media critics are gonna be busy."
-Adam Goldman NYT
Now there are reports that posters on 4chan made the golden shower story up sent it to Rick Wilson who then sent it to the CIA. You just can't make this shit up
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-invented-the-trump-golden-showers-story.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-invented-the-trump-golden-showers-story.html
Buzzfeed does a "study" about how widespread and terrible fake news is. Buzzfeed then shamelessly publishes blatant fake news. I always knew they were a joke, but this is a new low.
Buzzfeed's editor-in-chief said last night they have been trying for 2 weeks to confirm any of this and can't.
but published the story anyway...
i imagine that White House press pass Obama gave them get's revoked a few minutes after Trump's inauguration.
but published the story anyway...
i imagine that White House press pass Obama gave them get's revoked a few minutes after Trump's inauguration.
If I were BuzzFeed, I'd keep an eye on Gawker...
Lol at any Trumpers bitching about fake news or lies. Trump's been doing that for 8 years. "You won't believe what my investigators are finding in Hawaii!"
In a year when WikiLeaks was used as a news source (they are obviously Russia's bitch) does anyone have room to complain? Perhaps not.
If this is a troll, it is epic. If it is true, it is epic. Everyone wins
In a year when WikiLeaks was used as a news source (they are obviously Russia's bitch) does anyone have room to complain? Perhaps not.
If this is a troll, it is epic. If it is true, it is epic. Everyone wins
If it's a troll it means our intelligence agencies fvcking suck
still waiting for that proof that WikiLeaks published something "fake"...
There is signs some emails were altered by the hackers before turned over to WikiLeaks. Google, it's out there.
bullshit
i would be watching that 24/7 on every news outlet less Fox News if true...
you made the claim, you provide the source
well, it would only be the biggest story of the past 12 months. if even one document could be proven to have been altered it would destroy the integrity of every document released. the MSM would be on it like Trump hands on puzzy...
"I've looked at a lot of document dumps provided by hacker groups over the years, and in almost every case you can find a few altered or entirely falsified documents," said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of cybersecurity firm Taia Global.
Experts pointed to the Democratic National Committee email hack that happened earlier this year. Metadata from the stolen and leaked documents showed the hackers had edited documents. For example, hackers were kicked out of the DNC network June 11, yet among their documents is a file that was created on June 15, found Thomas Rid, a war studies professor at King’s College London."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...inton-wikileaks-emails-doctored-or-are-they-/
Experts pointed to the Democratic National Committee email hack that happened earlier this year. Metadata from the stolen and leaked documents showed the hackers had edited documents. For example, hackers were kicked out of the DNC network June 11, yet among their documents is a file that was created on June 15, found Thomas Rid, a war studies professor at King’s College London."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...inton-wikileaks-emails-doctored-or-are-they-/
" I don’t know whether it was doctored or whether the person sending it didn’t know what they were talking about."
-Tim Kaine
you are combining different releases. the article even spells out Guccifer 2.0 as the person that doctored metadata. it goes on to say,
"It is possible the WikiLeaks dump of Podesta’s emails includes forged or altered documents," Hennessey said. "With any large leak, it is wise to proceed with caution and skepticism and verify the authenticity of documents before reporting."
The Clinton campaign, however, has yet to produce any evidence that any specific emails in the latest leak were fraudulent.
"It is possible the WikiLeaks dump of Podesta’s emails includes forged or altered documents," Hennessey said. "With any large leak, it is wise to proceed with caution and skepticism and verify the authenticity of documents before reporting."
The Clinton campaign, however, has yet to produce any evidence that any specific emails in the latest leak were fraudulent.
"Experts pointed to the Democratic National Committee email hack that happened earlier this year. Metadata from the stolen and leaked documents showed the hackers had edited documents."
yes, and those documents were published by Guccifer2.0 NOT WikiLeaks...
On June 15 a Wordpress blog popped up out of nowhere. And, soon, a Twitter account, @GUCCIFER_2. The first post and tweet were clumsily titled: “DNC’s servers hacked by a lone hacker.” The message: that it was not hacked by Russian intelligence. The mysterious online persona claimed to have given “thousands of files and mails” to Wikileaks, while mocking the firm investigating the case: “I guess CrowdStrike customers should think twice about company’s competence,” the post said, adding “**** CrowdStrike!!!!!!!!!”
Along with the abuse, the Guccifer 2.0 account started publishing stolen DNC documents on the Wordpress blog, on file sharing sites, and by giving “a few docs from many thousands” to at least two US publications, The Smoking Gun and Gawker.
https://motherboard.vice.com/read/all-signs-point-to-russia-being-behind-the-dnc-hack
it was later confirmed that he had edited the metadata as the article you posted confirms. and the exact "edited" data was changing a date on one of the documents
The evidence linking the Guccifer 2.0 account to the same Russian operators is not as solid, yet a deception operation—a GRU false flag, in technical jargon—is still highly likely.
https://motherboard.vice.com/read/all-signs-point-to-russia-being-behind-the-dnc-hack
https://motherboard.vice.com/read/all-signs-point-to-russia-being-behind-the-dnc-hack
@andy4theherd why do you even bother? No amount of beatings will ever get him to admit he's wrong.
I should tell you the same thing I tell Greed: Google it yourself, lazy ass. But Greed is already Googling like crazy, so let's let him do it.
I am certain I read that in some tech article. I think it is obvious I don't make up shit here. I know I have read numerous articles that Russian hacks alter shit, Foreign Policy had a good piece on that a few months ago.
And anyway, why is it that so-called Americans like yourself are eager to lap up everything that comes out of the Russian stooge Assange?
