trump in trouble with white men

[dherd]

Donald J. Trump’s support among white men, the linchpin of his presidential campaign, is showing surprising signs of weakness that could foreclose his only remaining path to victory in November.

Two national polls conducted this month have Mrs. Clinton catching up to Mr. Trump among men over all. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows Mrs. Clinton with 43 percent support among men to his 42 percent. A Bloomberg Politics survey put Mr. Trump with a low-single-digit lead among men, according to the pollster who conducted the survey, Ann Selzer.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/19/us/politics/donald-trump-white-men.html?ref=todayspaper

 

[i am herdman]

That says a lot about the men in our society.

 

[raleighherdfan]

More lazy journalism. NYT using polls immediately following the Dem convention as if this is new polling data.......

 

[dherd]

yep, it shows they are wising up.

 

[andy4theherd]

"Leading up to voting day, the vast majority of polls predicted the remain side would prevail, however the final results gave the leave side a victory margin of more than one million votes."

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/04/why-the-majority-of-brexit-polls-were-wrong.html

 

[andy4theherd]

same type of situation as Brexit. the people supporting it were absolutely pissed off and coming out to vote. the "younger" people against it were like, "what'evs man" and didn't vote.

people supporting Trump are coming out to vote without question. people supporting Hillary are coming out to vote. the people that don't like either are staying home...

now take a look at their rally attendance and you will get an idea about voter turnout.

 

[herdit44]

now take a look at their rally attendance and you will get an idea about voter turnout

 

[HerdFan76]

The second to last pic looks like they're spelling "ILLARY", which is pretty damn accurate.

 

[dherd]

those pictures only demonstrate what we already know - there are a lot
of kooks in texas. who lay around on the sofa all day with time to go to listen to someone lie to them, and dumb enough to believe him.

 

[raleighherdfan]

View embedded media

It didn't lead to Bernie wins because the Dem party's super delegate structure.

 

[herdit44]

It didn't lead to Bernie wins because the Dem party's super delegate structure.

bernie received almost 4m less votes in the primaries.

 

[raleighherdfan]

bernie received almost 4m less votes in the primaries.

Everybody knows Bernie was robbed! ---Dem Socialists everywhere.

 

[Rock98Dog]

bernie received almost 4m less votes in the primaries.

I would suggest you read up on what occurred in the California democratic primary, specifically as it pertains to NPP ballots. As the old PSA used to proclaim "The More You Know...".

 

[Rock98Dog]

herdit44, read this.

http://www.nationofchange.org/2016/06/07/california-stolen-sanders-right-now/

understand this is not a conspiracy theory. The democratic machine controls this and Hillary and Bill control the democratic machine (hence the DNC's already proven bias against Bernie). The DNC, at the state level, trains those poll workers and decide the voting rules. They intentionally structured it so there was no way Bernie could win California, or many other states. The historically low voter turnout in the Dem primaries wasn't because people weren't interested, it was because they worked to suppress the Bernie voting block. These are the people you want running our country?

 

[herdit44]

I would suggest you read up on what occurred in the California democratic primary, specifically as it pertains to NPP ballots. As the old PSA used to proclaim "The More You Know...".

cool story, bro. that said, bernie's events drew 10x (or more) the number that hrc's drew, but yet he didn't get more votes than hillary. see the npr story that specifically mentions three cities (none in cali).

there's little to zero correlation between rally size and votes.

 

[herdit44]

The historically low voter turnout in the Dem primaries wasn't because people weren't interested, it was because they worked to suppress the Bernie voting block. These are the people you want running our country?

"historically low voter turnout" aka second highest since 1988.

btw, i've said on here many times i'm likely voting third party or skipping the top of the ballot.

 

[Rock98Dog]

cool story, bro. that said, bernie's events drew 10x (or more) the number that hrc's drew, but yet he didn't get more votes than hillary. see the npr story that specifically mentions three cities (none in cali).

there's little to zero correlation between rally size and votes.

You're right, when those that attend the rallies are not allowed to vote, there is no correlation. Did you even glance at the link I provided or do you prefer to stay unenlightened on the topic?

 

[raleighherdfan]

You're right, when those that attend the rallies are not allowed to vote, there is no correlation. Did you even glance at the link I provided or do you prefer to stay unenlightened on the topic?

This is Herdit you are conversing with. He will "hit and run" a topic once his assertion's narrative becomes less certain.

 

[herdit44]

You're right, when those that attend the rallies are not allowed to vote, there is no correlation. Did you even glance at the link I provided or do you prefer to stay unenlightened on the topic?

yeah, it's a great story, i followed it previously, but there is still ZERO CORRELATION BETWEEN RALLY SIZE AND VOTER TURNOUT.

not just bernie, but ever. dukakis drew large crowds in 88 and got blown out by bush.

mcgovern was drawing crowds of 20,000+ in new york in 72, but lost the state by 18 points to nixon.

here's a republican strategiest (quayle and gingrich press-secretary) express exactly that http://townhall.com/columnists/richgalen/2016/08/12/rally-size--turnout-n2203850

 

[Rock98Dog]

That post, both in content and use of the caps lock, was very dherdish, wouldn't you agree?

 

[GreenDuke]

If the voting took place tomorrow, Trump would lose in near historic fashion, aka '64 or '84.

Republicans need the October surprise this year or its lights out for DJT.

 

[herdfan429]

If the voting took place tomorrow, Trump would lose in near historic fashion, aka '64 or '84.

Republicans need the October surprise this year or its lights out for DJT.

Doesn't matter. Hillary can eat a baby on live tv and she'd still win in a landslide