ADVERTISEMENT

Trump's help moves steelworker to tears

Sure thing, Mr. LSAT.

Remind me again how many times you've passed a Bar exam?

The answer is probably the same number of English exams that you’ve passed. “Bar” should not be capitalized.

You’re boasting about “passing” a test where, in many cases, you can get about 40% of the questions wrong and still succeed on it?

Is there any wonder how there are so many attorneys out there who lack intelligence, are bad at their job, and make foolish posts on message boards when the toughest requirement in becoming a lawyer is not failing more than 40% of the time on what they are supposed to be experts on?

This is why the earlier argument where Herdman and Murox weighed in was so great. They claimed that since you are an attorney - tier 3 not withstanding - your opinion on a very specific type of legal question must be right over another opinion . . . yet the toughest requirement in becoming an attorney allows them to fail on 40% of questions about law and still pass!

It’s baffling.
 
Yet the Bar, and not the LSAT, is the sole measure by and through which someone is deemed fit to practice law. Weird.

Btw, my favorite Yags law story is the one re: the 2nd Amendment and the Federalist Papers. Priceless.
 
rifle's entire defense of his argument is predicated on the assumption that steel workers have a low IQ. I stand by my statement that there should be an IQ test and one should have to own real property to vote.

Additionally, I've said nothing about this guy's opinion. The only thing I've said is these are the folks who the left calls "uneducated." I'm a huge proponent of skilled vocational labor and believe many pass up good-paying jobs to get a worthless bachelor's degree because that's what society expects of them. Rifle demonstrates his ignorance yet again by not being able to differentiate between IQ and education.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
rifle's entire defense of his argument is predicated on the assumption that steel workers have a low IQ. I stand by my statement that there should be an IQ test and one should have to own real property to vote.

This is the biggest straw man the board has ever seen.

I made no comments about the guy's IQ. I have routinely made comments about how cheeto had the highest percentage of his supporters who were uneducated compared with every other Republican candidate. Even cheeto realized a high percentage of his support came from the uneducated ("We love the uneducated").

Your claim was that I (and the "left") call that guy uneducated. I have no idea what his background is other than being a third-generation steel worker (well, that is when he doesn't have to work 80 hours to put food on the table for his family living in a low-cost area). The fact that YOU claimed I called him "uneducated" (when I didn't) shows that you're the one making assumptions on his education and intelligence.


Rifle demonstrates his ignorance yet again by not being able to differentiate between IQ and education.

No, you've just demonstrated your ignorance yet again by refusing to believe that IQ and education have a strong, direct relationship. This has been shown many times by extensive research starting at young ages (pre-school) all the way through adulthood. In fact, studies have shown the exact points each year of education has on IQ on average.

Face it, your argument was ripe with extreme amounts of hypocrisy considering your previous statements.
 
This situation is clearly different - one with legal ramifications. A month ago, Cohen was "honorable" and "honest." Now, that same person claims that he has always know Cohen was a habitual liar.

That's not talking out of both sides of his mouth (not his "face," like you claimed, which is not the saying). That's simply lying to extremes on both sides in order to avoid legal problems.

Not only is this interesting as a case of bullshit, but I am fairly certain Guliani violated the NY Bar code of ethics. And yes, I took the time to read the relevant sections. Of course, nothing will come of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: countryroads89
Jesus Christ, unionism is based on socialistic theory.

that's why it' such a trick...…..I know numerous union people who support trump and repubicans now and those type of people moved to Trump in the past election. I don't know if it's they'd rather have jobs than representation if lucky enough to get job OR the fact they just are not going in with the far left agenda.

I guess I just assumed we all knew that as they are part of the group like the Reagan Democrats. maybe you aren't as up on political issues as I thought.
 
that's why it' such a trick...…..I know numerous union people who support trump and repubicans now and those type of people moved to Trump in the past election. I don't know if it's they'd rather have jobs than representation if lucky enough to get job OR the fact they just are not going in with the far left agenda.

I guess I just assumed we all knew that as they are part of the group like the Reagan Democrats. maybe you aren't as up on political issues as I thought.

Oh I'm up on it...I know they (and you) are typically dumbasses that vote against their own interests and depend on labels for political understanding...hence why you and "Reagan Democrats" actually think Reagan and Trump share the same economic philosophy or foreign policy.

What exactly is "the far left agenda"? Is it actual Marxism (the Proletariat collectively owning the means of production, and the eventual communism (little "c") of society? Is it this horrible system where we all pay taxes to share in the wealth of society and ensure a minimal level of support for the worst off among us (you know, that socialism we and most of the world already have)? Or is it about fags, Negroes, and furriners? I hear about that last thing more than any thing else. Shit, the Democratic Party can't even agree to officially support single payer health care, so I'm not sure what socialism you guys are bitching about.

I'd throw in something about taxes and debt, but the GOP has officially decided the debt no longer means shit.

It can't be guns, because if Obama didn't take our guns (as you all said he would), then no one will.
 
You are a moron if you think joe smuck union worker public or private in the southeast or mid west is down for all thus leftist crap. Maybe you will figure it out trumps second term idiot
 
The good news is trump is forcing all you lying leftist to show who you really are Mr “I’m to the right if Eisenhower”
 
You are a moron if you think joe smuck union worker public or private in the southeast or mid west is down for all thus leftist crap. Maybe you will figure it out trumps second term idiot

It never fails: you call someone a moron in a post riddled with spelling and grammar errors.

It also never fails that you and other mentally deficient posters resort to "moron" when you realize you are too fvxking stupid to asnwer a simple question. I'll ask again, inbred: What exactly is "the far left agenda"?
 
I’m
It never fails: you call someone a moron in a post riddled with spelling and grammar errors.

It also never fails that you and other mentally deficient posters resort to "moron" when you realize you are too fvxking stupid to asnwer a simple question. I'll ask again, inbred: What exactly is "the far left agenda"?
I’m drinking and flying ....and typing on phone, you still missed it on union workers but nice fall back to rifles playbook

You are just wrong
 
And too answer your question let’s just leave it at open boarders and big gov

Did I really need to tell you?
 
And too answer your question let’s just leave it at open boarders and big gov

Did I really need to tell you?

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
And too answer your question let’s just leave it at open boarders and big gov

Did I really need to tell you?

You mean Reagan and the Bushes closed the border? And they drastically cut spending? You might want to check on that. Hell, the latest Republican budget managed to increase spending.

Don't feel picked on, I ask raging liberals the same question on their "far right agenda" claims....at least they tend to have an answer (even if it too is ridiculous).
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT